14705 results found. results are sorted by relevance
  276-300
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/21/email21/msg02902.html
Did MRPM and Security have work and meetings ?
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/21/email21/msg02888.html
: > > https://mentor.ieee.org/802.21/file/08/21-08-0301-00-0sec-security-sg-nov-meeting-minutes.doc > > Best Regards, > Yoshihiro Ohba > Follow-Ups : Re: [802.21] Revised Security SG CR documents From: Yoshihiro Ohba References : Revised Security SG CR documents From: Yoshihiro Ohba Prev by Date: Re: [802.21] Revised Security SG CR documents Next by Date: Revised Security SG CR documents Previous by thread: Revised Security SG CR documents Next by thread: Re: [802.21] Revised Security SG CR documents Index(es): Date Thread
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/21/email21/msg02892.html
: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.21/file/08/21-08-0301-00-0sec-security-sg-nov-meeting-minutes.doc Best Regards, Yoshihiro Ohba Follow-Ups : Re: [802.21] Revised Security SG CR documents From: Yoshihiro Ohba References : Revised Security SG CR documents From: Yoshihiro Ohba Prev by Date: 回复: [802.21] Revised Security SG CR documents Next by Date: MRPM PAR/5C Previous by thread: Re: [802.21] Revised Security SG CR documents Next by thread: Re: [802.21] Revised Security SG CR documents Index(es): Date Thread
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/21/email21/msg02285.html
All, It appears from the discussion in the last couple of months on this topic that the following two problems should be studied: (i) security signaling optimization during handovers and (ii) MIH-level security mechanism.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/21/email21/msg02459.html
IMO, security signaling > > optimization for Mobile IP or IPsec gateways should be out of scope > > (if needed, it should be done in IETF). > > > > Regards, > > Yoshihiro Ohba > > Follow-Ups : RE: [802.21] Security SG: Scope issues From: Ron Pon References : RE: [802.21] Security SG: Scope issues From: Ron Pon RE: [802.21] Security SG: Scope issues From: Ron Pon Prev by Date: Updated Draft D8.0 Next by Date: RE: [802.21] Security SG: Scope issues Previous by thread: RE: [802.21] Security SG: Scope issues Next by thread: RE: [802.21] Security SG: Scope issues Index(es): Date Thread
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/21/email21/msg02696.html
Updated Security SG meeting agenda: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.21/file/08/21-08-0125-02-0sec-security-sg-aganda.ppt Security TR Issue List: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.21/file/08/21-08-0145-01-0sec-security-tr-issue-list.doc Regards, Yoshihiro Ohba Prev by Date: HBBS study group session time changed Next by Date: RE: [802.21] MRPM Discussions Previous by thread: MRPM Discussions Next by thread: HBBS study group session time changed Index(es): Date Thread
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/secmail/msg03254.html
[802SEC] Whither Goest The Link Security SG Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index [802SEC] Whither Goest The Link Security SG To : stds-802-sec@ieee.org Subject : [802SEC] Whither Goest The Link Security SG From : Howard Frazier < millardo@dominetsystems.com > Date : Thu, 20 Feb 2003 17:00:21 -0800 Sender : owner-stds-802-sec@majordomo.ieee.org User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020508 Netscape6/6.2.3 Dear Members of the IEEE 802 LMSC SEC, I have observed the discussion about the email motion to move the Link Security ECSG under the auspices of the 802.1 WG.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/21/email21/msg02484.html
Re: [802.21] Security SG: Reminder for TR contribution Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: [802.21] Security SG: Reminder for TR contribution To : STDS-802-21@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject : Re: [802.21] Security SG: Reminder for TR contribution From : Yoshihiro Ohba < yohba@tari.toshiba.com > Date : Sat, 5 Jan 2008 18:43:39 -0500 In-Reply-To : < 20080104144542.GA20330@steelhead.localdomain > List-Help : < http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/21/email21/msg02465.html
Will the MIH level security be discussed during the SG conference call today?
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/21/email21/msg02456.html
This hierarchy does   not imply administrative containment, nor does it imply a strict   tree topology. " Best Regards, Yoshihiro Ohba References : Security SG: Scope issues From: Yoshihiro Ohba RE: [802.21] Security SG: Scope issues From: Meylemans, Marc Prev by Date: RE: [802.21] Security SG: Scope issues Next by Date: Security SG conference call on Dec 18 Previous by thread: RE: [802.21] Security SG: Scope issues Next by thread: RE: [802.21] Security SG: Scope issues Index(es): Date Thread
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/21/email21/msg02899.html
: >> >> https://mentor.ieee.org/802.21/file/08/21-08-0301-00-0sec-security-sg-nov-meeting-minutes.doc >> >> Best Regards, >> Yoshihiro Ohba > > Follow-Ups : Re: [802.21] Revised Security SG CR documents From: Shubhranshu RE: [802.21] Revised Security SG CR documents From: Michael.G.Williams References : Revised Security SG CR documents From: Yoshihiro Ohba Re: [802.21] Revised Security SG CR documents From: Shubhranshu Prev by Date: MRPM SG Dallas meeting minutes Next by Date: new MRPM PAR/5C Previous by thread: Re: [802.21] Revised Security SG CR documents Next by thread: RE: [802.21] Revised Security SG CR documents Index(es): Date Thread
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/21/email21/msg02289.html
This is highly encouraged ;^) > > > >Best Regards, > >Michael > > > > Follow-Ups : Re: [802.21] Security related study group in 802.21 From: komarova References : Security related study group in 802.21 From: Michael.G.Williams Re: [802.21] Security related study group in 802.21 From: komarova Prev by Date: Re: [802.21] Security related study group in 802.21 Next by Date: Re: [802.21] Security related study group in 802.21 Previous by thread: Re: [802.21] Security related study group in 802.21 Next by thread: Re: [802.21] Security related study group in 802.21 Index(es): Date Thread
https://grouper.ieee.org/rac/private/email/msg01961.html
The operator is concerned that this would pose a security problem, since MAC address could be used in WiFi security solutions.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/21/email21/msg02889.html
: > > > > https://mentor.ieee.org/802.21/file/08/21-08-0301-00-0sec-security-sg-nov-meeting-minutes.doc > > > > Best Regards, > > Yoshihiro Ohba > > > > References : Revised Security SG CR documents From: Yoshihiro Ohba Re: [802.21] Revised Security SG CR documents From: Subir Das Prev by Date: FW: IEEE 802.3 comments on P802.21b proposed PAR Next by Date: Re: [802.21] Revised Security SG CR documents Previous by thread: Re: [802.21] Revised Security SG CR documents Next by thread: Re: [802.21] Revised Security SG CR documents Index(es): Date Thread
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/21/email21/msg02291.html
Regards, Yoshihiro Ohba References : Security related study group in 802.21 From: Michael.G.Williams Re: [802.21] Security related study group in 802.21 From: komarova Re: [802.21] Security related study group in 802.21 From: Yoshihiro Ohba Re: [802.21] Security related study group in 802.21 From: komarova Prev by Date: Teleconference July 03 Next by Date: Re: [802.21] Security related study group in 802.21 Previous by thread: Re: [802.21] Security related study group in 802.21 Next by thread: Lettbet Ballot Recirculation #1e Announcement Index(es): Date Thread
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/21/email21/msg02445.html
> > > > Yoshihiro Ohba > > > > > > > > Follow-Ups : Re: [802.21] Security SG: Definition of Administrative Domain From: Yoshihiro Ohba References : RE: [802.21] Security SG: Definition of Administrative Domain From: Gabor.Bajko Re: [802.21] Security SG: Definition of Administrative Domain From: Yoshihiro Ohba RE: [802.21] Security SG: Definition of Administrative Domain From: Gabor.Bajko Re: [802.21] Security SG: Definition of Administrative Domain From: Yoshihiro Ohba Prev by Date: Re: [802.21] Security SG: Definition of Administrative Domain Next by Date: Re: [802.21] Security SG: Definition of Administrative Domain Previous by thread: Re: [802.21] Security SG: Definition of Administrative Domain Next by thread: Re: [802.21] Security SG: Definition of Administrative Domain Index(es): Date Thread
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/21/email21/msg02463.html
Will the MIH level security be discussed during the SG conference call today?
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/21/email21/msg02453.html
This hierarchy does not imply administrative containment, nor does it imply a strict tree topology. " Best Regards, Yoshihiro Ohba References : Security SG: Scope issues From: Yoshihiro Ohba Prev by Date: Minutes of Dec. 13 MRPM Call Next by Date: Re: [802.21] Security SG: Scope issues Previous by thread: RE: [802.21] Security SG: Scope issues Next by thread: Re: [802.21] Security SG: Scope issues Index(es): Date Thread
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/21/email21/msg02458.html
This hierarchy does > not imply administrative containment, nor does it imply a strict > tree topology. > " > > Best Regards, > Yoshihiro Ohba References : Security SG: Scope issues From: Yoshihiro Ohba Prev by Date: Re: [802.21] Security SG: Scope issues Next by Date: RE: [802.21] Security SG: Scope issues Previous by thread: Re: [802.21] Security SG: Scope issues Next by thread: Re: [802.21] Security SG: Scope issues Index(es): Date Thread
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/17/email/msg01648.html
General framework - Security architecture proposals - Evaluation studies of existing security architectures - Layer model Proposals - Proposals of MAC independent functionality 4.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/21/email21/msg02789.html
Re: [802.21] Security SG Meeting Agenda Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: [802.21] Security SG Meeting Agenda To : STDS-802-21@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject : Re: [802.21] Security SG Meeting Agenda From : Yoshihiro Ohba < yohba@tari.toshiba.com > Date : Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:50:25 -0400 Delivered-to : mhonarc@GROUPER.IEEE.ORG In-reply-to : < 20080711223357.GL26659@steelhead.localdomain > List-help : < http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/16/arc/802-16list2/msg03301.html
Re: [STDS-802-16] Question on security sublayer Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: [STDS-802-16] Question on security sublayer To : STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org Subject : Re: [STDS-802-16] Question on security sublayer From : "Johnston, Dj" < dj.johnston@INTEL.COM > Date : Sun, 30 Apr 2006 16:39:17 -0700 List-Help : < http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/secmail/msg15332.html
References : [802SEC] Updated IEEE Statement on Security Incident From: Paul Nikolich Prev by Date: Re: [802SEC] +++10-Day-Letter Ballot+++Sponsor Invitation Letter Approval Next by Date: [802SEC] Updated IEEE Statement on Security Incident Previous by thread: [802SEC] Updated IEEE Statement on Security Incident Index(es): Date Thread
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/email/stds-802-11/msg02855.html
I have set up a security expert ad-hoc to advise me on how to respond to this attack.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/17/email/msg01782.html
Re: Link Security presentation From : "Robert D.