Here is a list of some of my relevant qualifications: Performance modeling activities: Founded and run AmerNet which specializes in architecture analysis and performance modeling for networking and communication products and have many clients in various committees of the IEEE 802 and elsewhere Recognized expert in the field of network/communication performance analysis and modeling and author of many publications, articles and papers on various aspects of LAN/Networking performance analysis Worked in the LAN performance analysis group at IBM since 1988 Activities in RPR: Have been participating in the RPRSG since the first meeting in May 2000 Volunteered to chair the adhoc committee on performance modeling for the RPRSG Successfully led the performance adhoc committee to reach agreement on a lot of open issues related to the performance modeling efforts Drafted and posted a draft charter for the RPR performance committee as well as the list of its accomplishments Activities in the IEEE 802 standards and other standard bodies: An active participant in the IEEE 802 since 1992 Have been a voting member of 802.3, 802.5, 802.15 and 802.17 Represented IBM's position in various IEEE 802 committees Provided a tutorial on QoS and priorities in Token Ring LANs based on extensive simulations and performance analysis The main IEEE 802 representative for Rockwell Semiconductor Systems Chaired the QoS study group from July 1998 till March 1999 An active participant in the IETF, NP Forum and IEEE 1394 Educational background: MS degree in Electrical Engineering (Caltech - 1986) Professional background: Specialized in the area of LAN performance analysis for my entire career Responsible for the performance analysis of many system architectures and networking chips at IBM Responsible for joint research work between IBM and NC-State University in the area of multimedia performance in LAN environments Founded AmerNet in May 1998 which specializes in performance modeling and architectural analysis In response to a request from our chair to clarify why I am active in IEEE 802.17: AmerNet provides services related to IEEE activities.
From IEEE Std 1394 Serial Bus experiences, as well as the telecom industry as a whole, the value of synchronous transfers is greatly increased if time-of-day clocks can also be synchronized.
From IEEE Std 1394 Serial Bus experiences, as well as the telecom industry as a whole, the value of synchronous transfers is greatly increased if time-of-day clocks can also be synchronized.
. > > From IEEE Std 1394 Serial Bus experiences, as well as > the telecom industry as a whole, the value of synchronous > transfers is greatly increased if time-of-day clocks > can also be synchronized. > > DVJ > > > David V.
From IEEE Std 1394 Serial Bus experiences, as well as the telecom industry as a whole, the value of synchronous transfers is greatly increased if time-of-day clocks can also be synchronized.
This is one place where the SG received conflicting information, so the more restrictive number was used ... since existence proofs (IEEE 1588 and IEEE 1394) shows that this kind of synchronization can easily be done with very low complexity.
I’ve uploaded the received comments to mentor: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/23/11-23-1394-00-00bf-lb276-comments-and-approved-resolutions.xlsx A few action items: - PoCs : Please review the comments that I have tentatively assigned to your area, and let me know if you any changes are needed. - PoCs : Once you’ve reviewed the comments assigned to your area, please send a request for volunteers to your TTT.
Best Regards, Adrian P STEPHENS Tel: +44 (1793) 404 825 Tel: +44 (7920) 084 900 Tel: +1 (408) 239 7485 ---------------------------------------------- Intel Corporation (UK) Limited Registered No. 1134945 (England) Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ VAT No: 860 2173 47 From: ***** IEEE stds-802-11-tgm List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jon Rosdahl Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 2:25 PM To: STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGM] [Gen AdHoc] Update to comment spreadsheet through Dec 7th Telecon --- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector --- I have uploaded doc 11-12/1394r3 which contains the updated status for the Gen AdHoc Comments through the Dec 7th Telecon. https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/12/11-12-1394-03-000m-gen-adhoc-preballot-comment-collection-resolutions.xlsx Note that there are still a lot of comments that could use some assistance in resolving.
Best Regards, Adrian P STEPHENS Tel: +44 (1793) 404 825 Tel: +44 (7920) 084 900 Tel: +1 (408) 239 7485 ---------------------------------------------- Intel Corporation (UK) Limited Registered No. 1134945 (England) Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ VAT No: 860 2173 47 From: ***** IEEE stds-802-11-tgm List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jon Rosdahl Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 2:25 PM To: STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGM] [Gen AdHoc] Update to comment spreadsheet through Dec 7th Telecon --- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector --- I have uploaded doc 11-12/1394r3 which contains the updated status for the Gen AdHoc Comments through the Dec 7th Telecon. https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/12/11-12-1394-03-000m-gen-adhoc-preballot-comment-collection-resolutions.xlsx Note that there are still a lot of comments that could use some assistance in resolving.
I could imagine one that is used to tag all IEC 61883-type packets (the normal tagging and formatting system for consumer-electronics type streams in 1394). -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Michael D.
Probably useful to the customers, >although accurate network timing and good QOS are >likely to be perceived as threats by IEEE 1394 zealots. > >DVJ > > >David V.
>Although I have chaired four different IEEE WGs, and two SGs (1196 Nubus 2, >1394, 1394b, and 1394c), those were all MSC-sponsored, and I was certainly >inexperienced with 802 procedures, much less 802.3 procedures.
Kind regards Stephen On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 at 14:47, Hanxiao (Tony, WT Lab) < 0000177ab8f731c4-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote: --- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Chairs' Advisory Committee Reflector --- Hi Stephen, TGbf would like to request one more motion (Now totally 3 motions): Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from LB276 on P802.11bf D2.0 as contained in document 11-23/1394r12, https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/23/11-23-1394-12-00bf-lb276-comments-and-approved-resolutions.xlsx Instruct the editor to prepare P802.11bf D3.0 incorporating these resolutions and, Approve a 30 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should P802.11bf D3.0 be forwarded to SA Ballot?”
. > > From IEEE Std 1394 Serial Bus experiences, as well as > the telecom industry as a whole, the value of synchronous > transfers is greatly increased if time-of-day clocks > can also be synchronized. > > DVJ > > > David V.
The following presentations were made: #1 Geoff Thompson, Nortel – Spyder-LAN (see Spider-LAN.ppt) Discussion: 1394 compatibility 100Mbps compatibility Can spyder mode be originated and best-effort data be later sent from the same DTE Can spider elements be cascaded?
IEEE 1394 and 1588. • The reliability of Ethernet components and systems can be extrapolated in the target environments with a high degree of confidence. 15 November 2005 IEEE 802.1./802.3 Residential Ethernet 6 Economic Feasibility Cost factors known, reliable data Reasonable cost for performance expected Total installation costs considered • The cost factors for Ethernet components and systems are well known.
Cell: +1 (819) 609-1394 E-Mail: francois.menard@xxxxxxxxxxx Follow-Ups : Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Glen Kramer Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Duane Remein Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Marek Hajduczenia References : Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Shawn Esser Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Marek Hajduczenia Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Barry Colella Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Marek Hajduczenia Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Barry Colella Prev by Date: Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans Next by Date: Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans Previous by thread: Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans Next by thread: Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans Index(es): Date Thread
This is one place where the SG received conflicting >> information, so the more restrictive number was used ... since existence >> proofs (IEEE 1588 and IEEE 1394) shows that this kind of >> synchronization can >> easily be done with very low complexity. >> >> The numbers I quote here are open for discussion.