Technologies such as IEEE 1394, Bluetooth and USB exist today but each has their own encapsulation, protocols, timing control, etc. such that building interworking functions is difficult.

The relevant standards include: >> >> CSMA/CD (IEEE 802.3, ISO 8802-3) >> Token Bus (IEEE 802.4, ISO 8802-4) >> >> Token Ring (IEEE 802.5, ISO/IEC 8802-5) >> >> IEEE 802.6 (ISO/IEC DIS 8802-6) FDDI (ISO 9314-2) >> >> WLAN (IEEE 802.11, ISO/IEC 8802-11) >> B) >> The 'company_id' relevant standards include: defined >> in IEEE Std >> 1212-1991 Control and Status Register (CSR) Architecture referenced >> by IEEE Std 896.2-1991 Futurebus+Physical Layers and Profiles >> IEEE Std 1596-1992 Scalable Coherent Interface >> IEEE Std 1394-1995 Serial Bus document.

The IEEE/RAC has (in my experience) attempted to avoid identifying specific instances of "things", such as I/O drivers on IEEE Std 1394.

Examples of devices which can be connected include computers, computer peripherals (similar to USB 2.0's 480 Mbps capability), PDA/HPCs, printers, set top boxes, information kiosks, image displays, virtual reality games, DVD players, and camcorders (similar to IEEE 1394's 400 Mbps capability).

Its good for 802 and its good for 1394.

Examples of devices which can be connected include computers, computer peripherals (similar to USB 2.0's 480 Mbps capability), PDA/HPCs, printers, set top boxes, information kiosks, image displays, virtual reality games, DVD players, and camcorders (similar to IEEE 1394's 400 Mbps capability).

Examples of devices which can be connected include computers, computer peripherals (similar to USB 2.0's 480 Mbps capability), PDA/HPCs, printers, set top boxes, information kiosks, image displays, virtual reality games, DVD players, and camcorders (similar to IEEE 1394's 400 Mbps capability).

The distinction between standards is getting fuzzy: 1394 over CAT-5, security over multiple transports, multiple transports over the same PHYs.

. >> This identifier uniquely identifies a device, such as a >> current IEEE 1394 node or a future memory, refrigerator, >> video controller, power supply, etc. >> >> Note that the same identifier must not be used for more than >> one purpose.

- 649 15 Wireless Gigabit Ethernet applications - · LOS · Data Rate:1.25 Gbps duplex · Range: ~ 6 m 653 16 · Replacement for 1394 FireWire · Replacement for USB · Military – future combat systems, secure communication - · LOS and NLOS (people) · 100 to 500 Mbps link, 1 Gbps in 2007 · Short range 665 Submission Page D.

I ’ ve uploaded the received comments to mentor:  https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/23/11-23-1394-00-00bf-lb276-comments-and-approved-resolutions.xlsx A few action items: PoCs : Please review the comments that I have tentatively assigned to your area, and let me know if you any changes are needed.

Your may also want to read IEEE 1394, which (some of us feel) should be useful for background and is also highly desirable to support in a reasonably transparent-to-traffic fashion.

. > > > > >From IEEE Std 1394 Serial Bus experiences, as well as > > the telecom industry as a whole, the value of synchronous > > transfers is greatly increased if time-of-day clocks > > can also be synchronized. > > > > DVJ > > > > > > David V.

Part 15: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for Low Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPAN) ( http://grouper.ieee.org/board/nescom/802-15-4.pdf ) P802.16.1b (C/LM) Telecommunications and Information Exchange Between Systems -LAN/MAN Specific Requirements - Air Interface for Fixed Broadband Wireless Access Systems including License-Exempt Frequencies ( http://grouper.ieee.org/board/nescom/802-16-1b.pdf ) P802.17 (C/LM) Information Technology - Telecommunications and information exchange between systems - Local and metropolitan area networks -Specific requirements -Resilient Packet Ring Access Method & Physical Layer Specifications ( http://grouper.ieee.org/board/nescom/802-17.pdf ) P1355.2 (C/MM) Standard for SpaceWire - Links, Nodes, Routers and Networks ( http://grouper.ieee.org/board/nescom/1355-2.pdf ) P1363.1 (C/MM) Standard Specification for Public-Key Cryptographic Techniques Based on Hard Problems over Lattices ( http://grouper.ieee.org/board/nescom/1363-1.pdf ) P1363.2 (C/MM) Standard Specification for Password-Based Public-Key Cryptographic Techniques ( http://grouper.ieee.org/board/nescom/1363-2.pdf ) P1577 (C/DA) Standard for Object-Oriented Extensions to IEEE Standard VHDL ( http://grouper.ieee.org/board/nescom/1577.pdf ) P1579 (C/MM) Standard for Parallel 10 Gb/s Signaling (LiteLink) ( http://grouper.ieee.org/board/nescom/1579.pdf ) P1600.1 (C/SCC) Standard Upper Ontology ( http://grouper.ieee.org/board/nescom/1600-1.pdf ) REVISED PARS P1394.3 (C/MM) Standard for High Performance Serial Bus Peer to Peer Data Transport Protocol ( http://grouper.ieee.org/board/nescom/1394-3.pdf ) P1484.12.1 (C/LTSC) Standard for Learning Object Metadata ( http://grouper.ieee.org/board/nescom/1484-12-1.pdf ) P1484.12.2 (C/LTSC) Standard for ISO/IEC 11404 binding for Learning Object Metadata P1484.12.1 data model ( http://grouper.ieee.org/board/nescom/1484-12-2.pdf ) P1484.12.3 (C/LTSC) Standard for XML binding for Learning Object Metadata P1484.12.1 data model ( http://grouper.ieee.org/board/nescom/1484-12-3.pdf ) PAR FOR THE REVISION OF A STANDARD P1164 (C/DA) Standard Multivalue Logic System for VHDL Model Interoperability (Std_logic_1164) ( http://grouper.ieee.org/board/nescom/1164.pdf ) __________________________________ Jodi Haasz Administrator, Standards Board Standards Activities 445 Hoes Lane PO Box 1331 Piscataway, NJ 08855-1331, USA Phone +1 732 562 6367 FAX +1 732 562 1571 Email: j.haasz@ieee.org Prev by Date: Call For Interest: Ethernet in the Last Mile Next by Date: FW: RevCom list of old standards Prev by thread: We now have the FINAL-Final Agenda for your viewing enjoyment !!!

Cell: +1 (819) 609-1394 E-Mail:  francois.menard@xxxxxxxxxxx       References : Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Shawn Esser Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Marek Hajduczenia Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Barry Colella Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Marek Hajduczenia Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Barry Colella Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Francois Menard Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Glen Kramer Prev by Date: [802.3_NGEPON] Macau material is uploaded Next by Date: Re: [802.3_NGEPON] 25G ONU Options to increase Network Capacity Previous by thread: Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans Next by thread: [802.3_NGEPON] IEEE 802.3ca Task Force :: Macau deadline approaching Index(es): Date Thread

Simple light weight encoders that > compress 9 or > 10 to one have been suggested to allow this content to then > be sent to a > remote device over 1394 or other networks.

Simple light weight encoders that compress 9 or 10 to one have been suggested to allow this content to then be sent to a remote device over 1394 or other networks.

Cell: +1 (819) 609-1394 E-Mail:  francois.menard@xxxxxxxxxxx       References : Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Shawn Esser Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Marek Hajduczenia Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Barry Colella Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Marek Hajduczenia Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Barry Colella Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Francois Menard Prev by Date: Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans Next by Date: Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans Previous by thread: Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans Next by thread: Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans Index(es): Date Thread

Cell: +1 (819) 609-1394 E-Mail:  francois.menard@xxxxxxxxxxx       Follow-Ups : Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Francois Menard Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Barry Colella References : Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Shawn Esser Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Marek Hajduczenia Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Barry Colella Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Marek Hajduczenia Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Barry Colella Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Francois Menard Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans From: Glen Kramer Prev by Date: Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans Next by Date: Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans Previous by thread: Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans Next by thread: Re: [802.3_NGEPON] ONU ASIC and wavelength plans Index(es): Date Thread

body=INFO%20STDS-802-SEC > List-owner : < mailto:STDS-802-SEC-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG > List-subscribe : < mailto:STDS-802-SEC-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG > List-unsubscribe : < mailto:STDS-802-SEC-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG > References : < 5.2.1.1.2.20110415090030.05f776c8@plus.pop.mail.yahoo.com > < A467684E7C9E412F8274733E636D2748@Puff2007 > Reply-to : "Grow, Bob" < bob.grow@INTEL.COM > Sender : ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** < STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org > Thread-index : Acv7b/9gNYt6K7AiQ2+szW1DCOtm9QAMvpHQ Thread-topic : [802SEC] New IEEE Standards Store Since WG Chairs are looking at their standards, I thought I'd try a few other searches: 2030 -- turned up a draft, but no way to tell what draft number Smart Grid -- produced P2030 and 1175-2010, the second makes no sense Floating point -- produced mostly good hits Environmental -- produced a long and seemingly good list (mostly Stds with "environmental" in the title, but some red herrings Backplane -- some good, some questionable (NuBus, FutureBus, were there, but I don't think of 1394 as a backplane standard).

It was noted that meshing also needs “hand over”. 11:42 Peter Johansson presented new MAC primitives for Synchronization support for 1394 or any time sync’ed protocol adaptation (document 03-0444-00-0030).

All options on the table Hybrid E/O Module 1550 nm E/O Module Single Mode Fiber 1-30+ Residences 100 Base FX GBE Idealized Port cost At Market Port Cost Easily Upgraded to 10 GE or WDM for higher rates Ethernet in the Last Mile - 14 Active MDUActive MDU MDU oriented media Hybrid E/O Module 1550 nm E/O Module Single Mode Fiber 1-30+ Apartments Also suitable for urban hybrid deployment (business & residential users) 100 Base FX GBE Similar to curb criteria Ethernet in the Last Mile - 15 Digital Access GatewayDigital Access Gateway (CPE)(CPE) 100 Base FX Potentially hybrid media Hybrid E/O Module IEEE 1394 100 BaseT CATV POTS Remote Power over Copper Loop Services platform

I ’ ve uploaded the received comments to mentor:  https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/23/11-23-1394-00-00bf-lb276-comments-and-approved-resolutions.xlsx A few action items: PoCs : Please review the comments that I have tentatively assigned to your area, and let me know if you any changes are needed.

RBR includes features appropriate for the >> > low-latency >> > backplane environment: destination-based flow control, low-power >> > short-haul >> > PHY, backplane-to-backplane links, transport of IEEE-1394 >> > isochronous >> > data, >> > and support of IEEE-1596 memory-update operations." >> > >> > Background material includes: >> > http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/msc/MSC200404/RbrSlides2004Mar31.pdf >> > http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/msc/MSC200401/RprBackplane.pdf >> > >> > Items on the agenda include: >> > 1) Formulation of email reflector lists. >> > 2) Review of approved PAR. >> > 3) Sollicitation of technical inputs and strawman proposals. >> > 4) Discussion of related activities. >> > 5) Future meeting schedule. >> > 6) Other items as requested. >> > >> > In particular, this is an opportunity to suggest directions, revisions >> > of the slides and objectives, and/or strawman proposals.

There is an additional standard, Wireless 1394, in development with expected completion in September 2001. 13.