483 results found. results are sorted by relevance
  76-100
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/15/pub/2002/Nov02/02392r11P802-15_TG3-LB19-running-comment-resolutions.pdf
02392r11P802-15_TG3-LB19-running-comment-resolutions.fm October, 2002 IEEE P802.15-02/392r11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 t in.
https://grouper.ieee.org/rac/private/email/pdfplE6fsJYDb.pdf
Microsoft Word - EPSG WDP 304 V-1-1-4 openSAFETY Safety Profile Specification EPSG Working Draft Proposal 304 V1.1.4 EPSG WDP 304 V-1-1-4 1/184 EPSG Working Draft Proposal 304 1 openSAFETY 2 Safety Profile Specification 3 Version 1.1.4 4 © EPSG 5 (Ethernet POWERLINK Standardisation Group) 6 2011 7 8 openSAFETY Safety Profile Specification EPSG Working Draft Proposal 304 V1.1.4 EPSG WDP 304 V-1-1-4 2/184 9 10 11 12 13 14 EPSG (Ethernet POWERLINK Standardisation Group) 15 16 17 POWERLINK-Office of the EPSG 18 Kurfuerstenstrasse 112 19 D-10787 Berlin 20 Germany 21 22 23 Phone +49.30.850885-29 24 Fax +49.30.850885-86 25 info@ethernet-powerlink.org 26 www.ethernet-powerlink.org 27 openSAFETY Safety Profile Specification EPSG Working Draft Proposal 304 V1.1.4 EPSG WDP 304 V-1-1-4 3/184 Disclaimer 28 Use of this EPSG Standard is wholly voluntary.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bt/comments/802d3bt_D3p1_TFTDs_DraftOrder.pdf
IEEE P802.3bt D3.1 4-Pair PoE 1st Sponsor recirculation ballot comments r01-60Cl 1 SC 1.4.338 P 24 L 40 Comment Type ER We pulled in the definition of PSE as modified by 802.3bu.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bj/comments/P8023bj-D1p3-Comments_Final_byID.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.3 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 4th Task Force review comments Response # 1Cl 91 SC 91.5.4.2.1 P 145 L 49 Comment Type E Missing word?
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bj/comments/P8023bj-D1p3-Comments_Received_byID.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.3 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 4th Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 91 SC 91.5.4.2.1 P 145 L 49 Comment Type E Missing word?
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bj/comments/P8023bj-D1p3-Comments_Proposed_byID.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.3 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 4th Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 91 SC 91.5.4.2.1 P 145 L 49 Comment Type E Missing word?
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bj/comments/P8023bj-D1p3-Comments_Final_byCls.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.3 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 4th Task Force review comments # 50Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type E The Working Group maintains a list of preferred spellings on its web pages.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bj/comments/P8023bj-D1p3-Comments_Proposed_byCls.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.3 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 4th Task Force review comments # 50Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type E The Working Group maintains a list of preferred spellings on its web pages.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bj/comments/P8023bj-D1p3-Comments_Received_byCls.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.3 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 4th Task Force review comments # 67Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type E Some hyperlinks to Figures and Tables within the document do not work.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/efm/public/comments/d2_0/D2_0_comments_final.pdf
MainTable P802.3ah Draft 2.0 Comments # 952Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type TR What is being proposed in many places throughout this draft is not a peer network.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/15/pub/2002/Nov02/02392r16P802-15_TG3-LB19-running-comment-resolutions.pdf
Untitled Document October, 2002 IEEE P802.15-02/392r16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 ct in.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/15/pub/2002/Nov02/02392r15P802-15_TG3-LB19-running-comment-resolutions.pdf
Untitled Document October, 2002 IEEE P802.15-02/392r15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 ct in.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cg/comments/802.3cg_draft3p0_Received_By%20Comment%20ID.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cg D3.0 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 10 Mb/s Operation and Associated Power Delivery over a Single Balanced Pair of Conductors Initial Sponsor ballot comments Proposed Response # i-1Cl 147 SC 147.9.2 P 203 L 32 Comment Type E Format of the "NOTE-" paragraph is incorrect SuggestedRemedy Use the appropriate paragraph style for "NOTE-" paragraphs.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cg/comments/802.3cg_draft3p0_Received_By%20Page%20Line.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cg D3.0 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 10 Mb/s Operation and Associated Power Delivery over a Single Balanced Pair of Conductors Initial Sponsor ballot comments i-287Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type G It will be a good standard, but at the moment there are missing so many instances, even if they can be considert editorial, that the commenter this time has to cast a negative vote .
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cg/comments/802.3cg_draft3p0_Received_By%20Clause%20Subclause.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cg D3.0 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 10 Mb/s Operation and Associated Power Delivery over a Single Balanced Pair of Conductors Initial Sponsor ballot comments # i-9Cl 00 SC FM P 12 L 28 Comment Type E The Editor's note: "New front matter text needs review." should be removed.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/re_study/material/DVJ%20whitepapers/dvjRePaper2005May03.pdf
StdBook.book Contribution from: dvj@alum.mit.edu.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/z/public/comments/d4/020898Detail.PDF
MainTable P802.3z Draft 4 Comments # 210Cl 00 SC 00.iv P iv L 24 Comment Type E Symbol for Boolean XOR is listed as ( )̂.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/minutes/nov2003/Minutes%20-%20Friday,%20November%2014,%202003.pdf
LMSC SEC minutes AGENDA & MINUTES (Unconfirmed) - IEEE 802 LMSC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING Friday, November 14, 2003 – 1:00 p.m.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/Minutes/Cons_Minutes_May-2003.pdf
doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/319r0 May 2003 doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/319r1 IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs Approved Minutes of the IEEE P802.11 Full Working Group May 12 - 16, 2003 Hyatt DFW, Dallas - Fort Worth, Texas, USA Joint 802.11 / 802.15 Opening Plenary: Monday, May 12, 2003 1.1.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/ba/public/jan10/P8023ba-D30-Comments_Received_byIDa.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3ba D3.0 40Gb/s and 100Gb/s Ethernet comments Draft 3.0 Comments Sponsor ballot Proposed Response # 1Cl 80 SC 80.1.2 P 125 L 30 Comment Type E It seems as one of points 5) and 6) is incorrect (if same fiber, SMF, then either 40 km or 10 km, not both).
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/15/pub/2002/Nov02/02391r17P802-15_TG3-LB19-comment-database.mdb
Also note thatit is virtually impossible to avoid repeatition of information in textual description due to the very nature of such description.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/Minutes/Cons_Minutes_Jan-2004.pdf
doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/035r0 January 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/035r1 IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs Approved Minutes of the IEEE P802.11 Full Working Group January 12-16, 2004 Hyatt Regency Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada Joint 802.11 / 802.15 Opening Plenary: Monday, January 12, 2004 1.1.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/efm/public/comments/d1_3/D1_3_comments_022503.pdf
P802.3ah Draft 1.3 Comments # 726Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type TR In case one of ONU is not working properly and start to send an an abnormally long output data stream, all other ONU will loss the opportunity of transmitting any packet in the upstream direction.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/efm/public/comments/d1_3/D1_3_comments_responses_030503.pdf
MainTable P802.3ah Draft 1.3 Comments # 491Cl 00 SC 0 P 0 L 0 Comment Type E All instances of "10PASS-TS" have been replaced by "10PASS-T".
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/ba/public/jan10/P8023ba-D30-Final_Responses_byID.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3ba D3.0 40Gb/s and 100Gb/s Ethernet comments Draft 3.0 Comments Sponsor ballot Response # 1Cl 80 SC 80.1.2 P 125 L 30 Comment Type E It seems as one of points 5) and 6) is incorrect (if same fiber, SMF, then either 40 km or 10 km, not both).