doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/1055r0 Sept 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/1055r0 IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs Tentative Minutes of the IEEE P802.11 Full Working Group Sept 13 - 17, 2004 Estrel Hotel, Berlin, Germany 9th Joint 802 Wireless Opening Plenary: Monday, Sept 13, 2004 1.1.

Project 802.16m Evaluation Methodology Document (EMD) 2008-03-04 IEEE 802.16m-08/004 1 Project IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group Title Project 802.16m Evaluation Methodology Document (EMD) Date Submitted 2008-03-04 Source(s) Editor: Roshni Srinivasan, Intel Corporation Jeff Zhuang, Motorola (Section 3) Louay Jalloul, Beceem Communications (Section 4) Robert Novak, Nortel Networks (Section 5,6,7,8) Jeongho Park, Samsung Electronics (Section 10) roshni.m.srinivasan@intel.com jeff.zhuang@motorola.com jalloul@beceem.com rnovak@nortel.com jeongho.jh.park@samsung.com Re: Evaluation Methodology for P802.16m-Advanced Air Interface Abstract This document is the approved baseline 802.16m Evaluation Methodology.

IEEE 802.16m Evaluation Methodology Document (EMD) 2008-07-03 IEEE 802.16m-08/004r2 1 Project IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group Title IEEE 802.16m Evaluation Methodology Document (EMD) Date Submitted 2008-07-03 Source(s) Editor: Roshni Srinivasan, Intel Corporation Jeff Zhuang, Motorola (Section 3) Louay Jalloul, Beceem Communications (Section 4) Robert Novak, Nortel Networks (Section 5,6,7,8) Jeongho Park, Samsung Electronics (Section 10) roshni.m.srinivasan@intel.com jeff.zhuang@motorola.com jalloul@beceem.com rnovak@nortel.com jeongho.jh.park@samsung.com Re: Evaluation Methodology for P802.16m-Advanced Air Interface Abstract This document is the approved baseline 802.16m Evaluation Methodology.

Project 802.16m Evaluation Methodology Document (EMD) 2008-03-17 IEEE 802.16m-08/004r1 1 Project IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group Title IEEE 802.16m Evaluation Methodology Document (EMD) Date Submitted 2008-03-17 Source(s) Editor: Roshni Srinivasan, Intel Corporation Jeff Zhuang, Motorola (Section 3) Louay Jalloul, Beceem Communications (Section 4) Robert Novak, Nortel Networks (Section 5,6,7,8) Jeongho Park, Samsung Electronics (Section 10) roshni.m.srinivasan@intel.com jeff.zhuang@motorola.com jalloul@beceem.com rnovak@nortel.com jeongho.jh.park@samsung.com Re: Evaluation Methodology for P802.16m-Advanced Air Interface Abstract This document is the approved baseline 802.16m Evaluation Methodology.

Microsoft Word - EPSG WDP 304 V-1-1-4 openSAFETY Safety Profile Specification EPSG Working Draft Proposal 304 V1.1.4 EPSG WDP 304 V-1-1-4 1/184 EPSG Working Draft Proposal 304 1 openSAFETY 2 Safety Profile Specification 3 Version 1.1.4 4 © EPSG 5 (Ethernet POWERLINK Standardisation Group) 6 2011 7 8 openSAFETY Safety Profile Specification EPSG Working Draft Proposal 304 V1.1.4 EPSG WDP 304 V-1-1-4 2/184 9 10 11 12 13 14 EPSG (Ethernet POWERLINK Standardisation Group) 15 16 17 POWERLINK-Office of the EPSG 18 Kurfuerstenstrasse 112 19 D-10787 Berlin 20 Germany 21 22 23 Phone +49.30.850885-29 24 Fax +49.30.850885-86 25 info@ethernet-powerlink.org 26 www.ethernet-powerlink.org 27 openSAFETY Safety Profile Specification EPSG Working Draft Proposal 304 V1.1.4 EPSG WDP 304 V-1-1-4 3/184 Disclaimer 28 Use of this EPSG Standard is wholly voluntary.

02392r11P802-15_TG3-LB19-running-comment-resolutions.fm October, 2002 IEEE P802.15-02/392r11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 t in.

MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.3 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 4th Task Force review comments Response # 1Cl 91 SC 91.5.4.2.1 P 145 L 49 Comment Type E Missing word?

MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.3 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 4th Task Force review comments # 50Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type E The Working Group maintains a list of preferred spellings on its web pages.

MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.3 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 4th Task Force review comments # 67Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type E Some hyperlinks to Figures and Tables within the document do not work.

MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.3 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 4th Task Force review comments # 50Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type E The Working Group maintains a list of preferred spellings on its web pages.

MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.3 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 4th Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 91 SC 91.5.4.2.1 P 145 L 49 Comment Type E Missing word?

IEEE P802.3bt D3.1 4-Pair PoE 1st Sponsor recirculation ballot comments r01-60Cl 1 SC 1.4.338 P 24 L 40 Comment Type ER We pulled in the definition of PSE as modified by 802.3bu.

MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.3 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 4th Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 91 SC 91.5.4.2.1 P 145 L 49 Comment Type E Missing word?

MainTable P802.3ah Draft 2.0 Comments # 952Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type TR What is being proposed in many places throughout this draft is not a peer network.

Untitled Document October, 2002 IEEE P802.15-02/392r15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 ct in.

Untitled Document October, 2002 IEEE P802.15-02/392r16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 ct in.

LMSC SEC minutes AGENDA & MINUTES (Unconfirmed) - IEEE 802 LMSC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING Friday, November 14, 2003 – 1:00 p.m.

MainTable IEEE P802.3cg D3.0 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 10 Mb/s Operation and Associated Power Delivery over a Single Balanced Pair of Conductors Initial Sponsor ballot comments Proposed Response # i-1Cl 147 SC 147.9.2 P 203 L 32 Comment Type E Format of the "NOTE-" paragraph is incorrect SuggestedRemedy Use the appropriate paragraph style for "NOTE-" paragraphs.

MainTable IEEE P802.3cg D3.0 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 10 Mb/s Operation and Associated Power Delivery over a Single Balanced Pair of Conductors Initial Sponsor ballot comments # i-9Cl 00 SC FM P 12 L 28 Comment Type E The Editor's note: "New front matter text needs review." should be removed.

MainTable P802.3z Draft 4 Comments # 210Cl 00 SC 00.iv P iv L 24 Comment Type E Symbol for Boolean XOR is listed as ( )̂.

MainTable IEEE P802.3cg D3.0 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 10 Mb/s Operation and Associated Power Delivery over a Single Balanced Pair of Conductors Initial Sponsor ballot comments i-287Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type G It will be a good standard, but at the moment there are missing so many instances, even if they can be considert editorial, that the commenter this time has to cast a negative vote .

StdBook.book Contribution from: dvj@alum.mit.edu.

MainTable IEEE P802.3ba D3.0 40Gb/s and 100Gb/s Ethernet comments Draft 3.0 Comments Sponsor ballot Proposed Response # 1Cl 80 SC 80.1.2 P 125 L 30 Comment Type E It seems as one of points 5) and 6) is incorrect (if same fiber, SMF, then either 40 km or 10 km, not both).

P802.3ah Draft 1.3 Comments # 726Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type TR In case one of ONU is not working properly and start to send an an abnormally long output data stream, all other ONU will loss the opportunity of transmitting any packet in the upstream direction.

doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/035r0 January 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/035r1 IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs Approved Minutes of the IEEE P802.11 Full Working Group January 12-16, 2004 Hyatt Regency Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada Joint 802.11 / 802.15 Opening Plenary: Monday, January 12, 2004 1.1.