MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D3.0 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems Initial Sponsor ballot comments # I-145Cl FM SC FM P1 L29 Comment Type T This PHY does not operate over DWDM systems as Pete Anslow defined them
IEEE P802.3df D1.1 2nd Task Force review comments # 47Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 31 Comment Type E "adds MAC parameters, Physical Layers, and management parameters" but we talk about "the Physical Layer" like
MainTable D2.1 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 2.5 Gb/s, 5 Gb/s, and 10 Gb/s Autom P802.3ch D2.1 124Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type T the changes to allow the user to set preco
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D3.0 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems Initial Sponsor ballot comments Proposed Response # I-1Cl 1 SC 1.3 P21 L8 Comment Type TR Please reconcile if ITU-T G709.1 or ITU-T G709 is the
IEEE P802.3bq D2.1 Physical Layer and Management Parameters for 40Gb/s Operation, Type 40GBASE-T 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments 103Cl 55 SC 55.3.5.3 P 54 L 45 Comment Type ER Strikeou
IEEE P802.3bt D2.1 4-Pair PoE 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments 162Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type TR TDL D2.0 #513 - System Unbalance Requirements SuggestedRemedy See paul_01_1116.pdf WFP T
MainTable D2.1 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 2.5 Gb/s, 5 Gb/s, and 10 Gb/s Autom P802.3ch D2.1 Proposed Response # 1Cl 45 SC 45.2.1 P 32 L 31 Comment Type T The definitio
IEEE P802.3df D1.1 2nd Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 124 SC 124.8.5 P 107 L 1 Comment Type TR The text in the last bullet under 124.8.5 "The 400GBASE-DR4-2 or 800GBASE-DR8-2 trans
MainTable IEEE P802.3cb D3.0 2.5 Gb/s and 5 Gb/s Operation over Backplane Initial Sponsor ballot comments Response # i-1Cl 127 SC 127.2.6.2.1 P 85 L 8 Comment Type TR *** Comment submitted with the fi
IEEE 802.3by D2.1 25 Gb/s Ethernet 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 108 SC 108.5.2.4 P 106 L 15 Comment Type T CL 108.5.2.4 In 802.3bj, CL 91.5.3.7 (AM mapping a
IEEE P802.3cy D3.0 10G+ Auto Task Force Initial Sponsor ballot commentsProposed Responses I-1Cl 0 SC 0 P 1 L 0 Comment Type G It seems unlikely that .3cw (Amendment #8) is approved before .3cy (Amendm
Comment ID Date Comment . Name Email Phone Style Index . Classification Vote Category Page Subclause Line Comment File Must Be Satisfied Proposed Change Resolution Status Resolution Detail Other1 Othe
IEEE 802.21 Project IEEE 802.21 Media Independent Handover Services < http://www.ieee802.org/21/ > Title MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER Date Submitted May, 2005 Source(s) Joint Harmonized Contribution Re:
MainTable comments # 280Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E SuggestedRemedy Comment Status X Response Status C NoName Proposed Response # 205Cl 00 SC P 2 L 1 Comment Type E Add note to balloters to indicate t
MainTable P802.3ah Draft 1.732 Comments # 56001Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E To accept the editorial recommendations from the IEEE Staff Editor on Clauses 00, 01, 56 & 66 SuggestedRemedy Proposed Respon
March, 2005 doc.: IEEE 802.11-05/0286r0 IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs Approved Minutes of the IEEE P802.11 Full Working Group Date: 2005-03-14 Author(s): Name Company Address Phone email Tim Godfrey Cone
IEEE P802.3bt D2.0 4-Pair PoE Initial Working Group ballot comments 172Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type ER There are a large number of broken cross references in the draft. These should either be made into
IEEE P802.3bt D2.0 4-Pair PoE Initial Working Group ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 33 SC 5.1.2 P 175 L 51 Comment Type TR The editor's note refers to TABLE 33-22. This appears to be the wrong
MainTable P802.3ah Draft 1.732 Comments # 56001Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E To accept the editorial recommendations from the IEEE Staff Editor on Clauses 00, 01, 56 & 66 SuggestedRemedy Proposed Respon
MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.0 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 1st Task Force review comments Response # 1Cl 93 SC 93.8.1 Table 93-4 P 131 L 11 Comment Type T Common mode DC output voltage is specif
MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.0 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 1st Task Force review comments # 286Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type ER For channel parameters, "differential insertion loss" and "insertion
Comments on Draft 2.1 as of 8th August 2005 IEEE P802.3aq Draft 2.1 Comments # 1001Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type TR See John George's Comment #6 in recirculation package. SuggestedRemedy Per suggested rem
MainTable IEEE P802.3br D3.0 Interspersing Express Traffic (IET) Initial Sponsor ballot comments March 2016 # i-1Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 1 Comment Type E Based on IEEE P802.3by entering sponsor ballot in No
802.3cb 2.5GBASE-X PCS/PMA proposed text for draft 0.1 802.3cb 2.5GBASE-X PCS/PMA proposed text for draft 0.1 William Lo (Marvell) 1 29 February 2016 To make editing instructions easier to understand
IEEE P802.3bz D3.0 2.5G/5GBASE-T Initial Sponsor ballot comments # i-60Cl 0 SC 0 P 67 L 1 Comment Type E Inconsistent spelling of signaling (42 instances) vs. signalling (8 instances). I think the for