MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.0 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 1st Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 93 SC 93.8.1 Table 93-4 P 131 L 11 Comment Type T Common mode DC output voltage
Comments on Draft 2.0 - Final report IEEE P802.3aq Comments 25/ # 1Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type T As drafted, the standard allows the existance of a ""compliant"" equalizer with adaptation times too slow
Recirculation Ballot #3a Resolution Report 2001/07/13 IEEE 802.16-01/30r1 Roger Marks Member EditorialType This change was accepted in Comment 821 of Letter Ballot #3, but change was not implemented a
MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.0 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 1st Task Force review comments # 286Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type ER For channel parameters, "differential insertion loss" and "insertion
IEEE P802.3bt D2.2 4-Pair PoE 2nd Working Group recirculation ballot comments # 429Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 25 Comment Type ER "This draft is an amendment of IEEE Std 802.3-2015. The purpose of the amendment
IEEE P802.3bt D2.2 4-Pair PoE 2nd Working Group recirculation ballot comments Response # 1Cl 33 SC 33.2.8.5 P 122 L 25 Comment Type TR Section 33.2.8.5 can be reordered to be much more clear. Suggeste
MainTable IEEE P802.3cb 2.5 Gb/s and 5 Gb/s Backplane Initial Working Group ballot comments D2p0 Proposed Response # 1Cl 128 SC 7.1.6 P 109 L 41 Comment Type ER The cluase deals with common mode outpu
MainTable IEEE P802.3cb 2.5 Gb/s and 5 Gb/s Backplane Initial Working Group ballot comments D2p0 # 120Cl FM SC P 1 L 18 Comment Type E Extraneous "." at the end of the amendment title SuggestedRemedy
IEEE 802.3 comment tool IEEE P802.3bp D1.4 1000BASE-T1 PHY 5th Task Force review commentsProposed Responses # 504Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type E Is there supposed to be a period after heach item in a De
IEEE P802.3ch D2.0 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for Greater Than 1 Gb/s Automotive Ethernet Initial Working Group ballot comments P802.3ch D2.0 # 96Cl FM SC P 1 L13 Comment
IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, 200 Gb/s Ethernet 1st Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 091 SC 91.6.2a P 86 L 11 Comment Type E It should be bit 1.200.3 rather than 1.200.2 Suggested
IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, 200 Gb/s Ethernet 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments # 2Cl 030 SC 30.5.1.1.2 P 43 L 16 Comment Type E Comment #20 against D2.0 changed all instances of "2
IEEE P802.3df D2.0 Initial Working Group ballot comments IEEE P802.3df D2.0 Initial Working Group ballot comments # 50Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 29 Comment Type E Both cx and cz were approved during the March
IEEE P802.11 – TASK GROUP AJ - MEETING UPDATE Status of Project IEEE 802.11aj - China Milli-Meter Wave (CMMW) Task Groups Position Chair – Jiamin CHEN (Huawei) Vice Chair – Haiming WANG (SEU) Techni
IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, 200 Gb/s Ethernet 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments # 2Cl 030 SC 30.5.1.1.2 P 43 L 16 Comment Type E Comment #20 against D2.0 changed all instances of "2
Unconfirmed Minutes - IEEE 802.3 CSMA/CD Plenary Vancouver, BC July 8-11, 2002 Unconfirmed Minutes IEEE 802.3 CSMA/CD PLENARY Vancouver, BC July 8-11, 2002 MONDAY, 8 JULY ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS Mr. Ro
IEEE P802.3cx D2.0 ITSA Task Force Initial Working Group ballot commentsApproved Responses # 151Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 1 Comment Type E Date in header doesn't have day "September 2021" SuggestedRemedy Add
IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, 200 Gb/s Ethernet 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 045 SC 45.2.1 P 47 L 25 Comment Type T The choice of registers 284 through 28
IEEE P802.3cx D2.0 ITSA Task Force Initial Working Group ballot commentsApproved Responses # 151Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 1 Comment Type E Date in header doesn't have day "September 2021" SuggestedRemedy Add
IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, 200 Gb/s Ethernet 1st Task Force review comments # 69Cl FM SC FM P 15 L 2 Comment Type E In the table of contents, there is no space between clause number and clause t