IEEE P802.3df D1.1 2nd Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 124 SC 124.8.5 P 107 L 1 Comment Type TR The text in the last bullet under 124.8.5 "The 400GBASE-DR4-2 or 800GBASE-DR8-2 trans
IEEE P802.3df D1.1 2nd Task Force review comments # 47Cl FM SC FM P 1 L31 Comment Type E "adds MAC parameters, Physical Layers, and management parameters" but we talk about "the Physical Layer" like "
MainTable D2.1 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 2.5 Gb/s, 5 Gb/s, and 10 Gb/s Autom P802.3ch D2.1 # 40Cl FM SC P 2 L 5 Comment Type E "This amendment to IEEE Std 802.3-2018
IEEE P802.3cy D3.0 10G+ Auto Task Force Initial Sponsor ballot commentsProposed Responses I-1Cl 0 SC 0 P 1 L 0 Comment Type G It seems unlikely that .3cw (Amendment #8) is approved before .3cy (Amendm
IEEE 802.3by D1.0 25 Gb/s Ethernet 2nd Task Force review comments # 192Cl 000 SC 0 P L Comment Type E Presumably this is an amendment to what is presently 802.3bx, which is further towards ratificatio
MainTable IEEE P802.3cb D3.0 2.5 Gb/s and 5 Gb/s Operation over Backplane Initial Sponsor ballot comments # i-96Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 3 Comment Type E Now that the likely approval order has become clearer
IEEE P802.3df D1.1 2nd Task Force review comments Response # 1Cl 124 SC 124.8.5 P 107 L1 Comment Type TR The text in the last bullet under 124.8.5 "The 400GBASE-DR4-2 or 800GBASE-DR8-2 transmitter is
IEEE P802.3cg D3.0 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 10 Mb/s Operation and Associated Power Delivery over a Single Balanced Pair of Conductors Initial Sponsor ballot comments
MainTable IEEE P802.3 (IEEE 802.3dc) D3.0 Maintenance #16 (Revision) Initial Sponsor ballot comments Proposed Response # I-1Cl 69 SC 69.1.1 P 3018 L13 Comment Type T It is not necessary to specify the
PHY layer proposal for BWA 2000-02-25 IEEE 802.16.1pc-00/14 Project IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group Title PHY layer proposal for BWA Date Submitted 2000-02-25 Source Jay Klein Ense
IEEE P802.3bz D1.0 2.5/5GBASE-T 1st Task Force review comments # 211Cl 00 SC 0 P 1 L 28 Comment Type E Both "twisted-pair" and "twisted pair" appear to be used interchangeably throughout the document.
IEEE P802.3ap/D2.3 Backplane Ethernet Comments: Proposed Responses Sorted by Clause, Page, Line IEEE P802.3ap/D2.3 Backplane Ethernet CommentsProposed Responses # 18Cl 00 SC P 11 L 7 Comment Type E Pa
IEEE 802.3by D1.0 25 Gb/s Ethernet 2nd Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 045 SC 45.2.1.102.1 P 43 L 16 Comment Type E "alignment markers lock" should be "alignment marker lock" Sugges
Physical Layer Proposal for the 802.16.1 Air Interface Specification 2000-04-27 IEEE 802.16.1pc-00/27 1-1 Project IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group Title Phys
IEEE P802.3bz D1.0 2.5/5GBASE-T 1st Task Force review comments # 120Cl 126 SC 126.7.4 P 169 L 8 Comment Type E This subclause lacks a clear and logical narrative. Suggest to reorganize the existing in
January 1993 IEEE P802.11-93/1 Application of Mathematica Based Simulation Template to Demand Assigned MAC Described in IEEE P802.11-92/39 (liThe IBM MAC Proposal") Submitted By: Larry Van Der Jagt Kn
IEEE P802.3bz D1.0 2.5/5GBASE-T 1st Task Force review comments 237Cl 126 SC 126.1.1 P 69 L 35 Comment Type T Late comment on behalf of Brett McClellan, Marvell There is no PMD in clause 126. Reference
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D3.0 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems Initial Sponsor ballot comments # I-145Cl FM SC FM P1 L29 Comment Type T This PHY does not operate over DWDM systems as Pete Anslow defined them
IEEE P802.3df D1.1 2nd Task Force review comments # 47Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 31 Comment Type E "adds MAC parameters, Physical Layers, and management parameters" but we talk about "the Physical Layer" like
MainTable D2.1 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 2.5 Gb/s, 5 Gb/s, and 10 Gb/s Autom P802.3ch D2.1 124Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type T the changes to allow the user to set preco
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D3.0 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems Initial Sponsor ballot comments Proposed Response # I-1Cl 1 SC 1.3 P21 L8 Comment Type TR Please reconcile if ITU-T G709.1 or ITU-T G709 is the