119304 results found. results are sorted by relevance
  26-50
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/at/comments/D4.0/P802d3at_D4p0_premtg_by_clause.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3at D4.0 PoEplus comments # 24Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type G For readers' comprehension, please add informative annex which describes relationship between exsiting 802.3af devices a
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bj/comments/P8023bj-D2p0-Comments_Final_byCls.pdf
IEEE P802.3bj D2.0 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable Initial Working Group ballot comments # 12Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E Use of acronyms not in 1.5. FW is broadly used in this document, though pri
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/at/comments/D4.0/P802d3at_D4p0_premtg_by_ID.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3at D4.0 PoEplus comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 25 SC 25.4.4a.1 P 19 L 51 Comment Type G Draft D4 Figure 25-1 title: The title use "test fixture" and the text in Note 1 use "test
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/at/comments/D0.9/P802d3at_D0p9_postmtg_by_clause.pdf
MainTable comments # 280Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E SuggestedRemedy Comment Status X Response Status O NoName Proposed Response # 205Cl 00 SC P 2 L 1 Comment Type E Add note to balloters to indicate t
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/br/Comments%20received%20on%20IEEE%20P802.3br%20drafts/P8023br_D2_1_comment_response_by_clause.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3br (D2.0) Interspersing Express Traffic Initial Working Group ballot comments # 292Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E The attribute aMACMergeStatusTx contains the direction "Tx". Should
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/av/public/2008_03/3av_0803_comments_d1_1_accepted.pdf
MainTable IEEE 802.3av D1.1 10G EPON comments IEEE 802.3av Draft 1.1 Initial Comments Input # 825Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type TR There should be test vectors for the RS(255, 223) code SuggestedRemedy I
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bj/comments/P8023bj-D2p0-Comments_Final_byID.pdf
IEEE P802.3bj D2.0 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable Initial Working Group ballot comments Response # 1Cl 45 SC 45.2.1.92b P 37 L 48 Comment Type T There is a need for an align status bit in the Tx
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bt/comments/802d3bt_D3p1_TFTDs_DraftOrder.pdf
IEEE P802.3bt D3.1 4-Pair PoE 1st Sponsor recirculation ballot comments r01-60Cl 1 SC 1.4.338 P 24 L 40 Comment Type ER We pulled in the definition of PSE as modified by 802.3bu. The term "DTE powerin
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cd/public/Mar17/8023cd_d12_comment_proposed_responses_and_resolved_in_tracks.pdf
IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, 200 Gb/s Ethernet 3rd Task Force review comments # 10Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 31 Comment Type E IEEE Std 802.3bu-2016 and IEEE Std 802.3bv-201x are missing from the list of a
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bj/comments/P8023bj-D2p0-Comments_Received_byCls.pdf
IEEE P802.3bj D2.0 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable Initial Working Group ballot comments # 12Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E Use of acronyms not in 1.5. FW is broadly used in this document, though pri
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/ck/comments/draft2p0/8023ck_D2p0_comments_proposedResponses.pdf
IEEE P802.3ck D2.0 100/200/400 Gb/s Electrical Interfaces Task Force Initial Working Group ballot comments # 229Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 10 Comment Type E From the amendment list starting at line 28, it appe
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/ck/comments/draft2p0/8023ck_D2p0_comments_proposedResponses_sortedByNumber.pdf
IEEE P802.3ck D2.0 100/200/400 Gb/s Electrical Interfaces Task Force Initial Working Group ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 45 SC 45.2.1.115a P 46 L 13 Comment Type E When a new subclause is in
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bj/comments/P8023bj-D2p0-Comments_Received_byID.pdf
IEEE P802.3bj D2.0 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable Initial Working Group ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 45 SC 45.2.1.92b P 37 L 48 Comment Type T There is a need for an align status bit i
IEEE 802.16.1: Action Report on Comment Resolution at Session #11
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/16/tg1/docs/802161-01_07.pdf
IEEE 802.16.1: Action Report on Comment Resolution at Session #11 IEEE 802.16.1: Action Report on Comment Resolution at Session #11: 2001/02/18 2001/02/18 IEEE 802.16.1-01/07 Stanley Wang Neither Edit
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cw/comments/D2p0/8023cw_D2p0_comments_final_so_far_Sept_13_by_clause.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.0 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems Initial Working Group ballot comments # 151Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 2 Comment Type E IEEE Std 802.3-2022 is both approved and published. SuggestedRemed
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/at/comments/D3.0/P802d3at_D3p0_postmtg3_by_clause.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3at D3.0 PoEplus comments # 467Cl 00 SC 00 P L Comment Type ER The current ballot claims that it is referenced against P802.3ay Draft 2.1. As of the date of the close of this ballo
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cw/comments/D2p0/8023cw_D2p0_comments_final_so_far_Sept_12_by_ID.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.0 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems Initial Working Group ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 25 Comment Type E "IEEE Std 802.3-202x" is no lomnger correct - we
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/at/comments/D3.0/P802d3at_D3p0_postmtg3_by_ID.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3at D3.0 PoEplus comments Response # 1Cl 33E SC 33E P 151 L 10 Comment Type E Include a reference to channel DC resistance unbalance specifications defined by TIA. SuggestedRemedy
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/efm/public/comments/d1_7/D1_732_comments_responses_062003.pdf
MainTable P802.3ah Draft 1.732 Comments # 348Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E typo: 025 should be 0.25 SuggestedRemedy Proposed Response PROPOSED ACCEPT IN PRINCIPLE. The commenter is asked to indicate the
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cw/comments/D2p0/8023cw_D2p0_comments_proposed_by_ID.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.0 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems Initial Working Group ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 25 Comment Type E "IEEE Std 802.3-202x" is no lomnger correct - we
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cw/comments/D2p0/8023cw_D2p0_comments_proposed_by_clause.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.0 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems Initial Working Group ballot comments # 151Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 2 Comment Type E IEEE Std 802.3-2022 is both approved and published. SuggestedRemed
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cw/comments/D2p0/8023cw_D2p0_comments_final_so_far_Sept_12_by_clause.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.0 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems Initial Working Group ballot comments # 151Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 2 Comment Type E IEEE Std 802.3-2022 is both approved and published. SuggestedRemed
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cw/comments/D2p0/8023cw_D2p0_comments_final_so_far_Sept_13_by_ID.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.0 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems Initial Working Group ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 25 Comment Type E "IEEE Std 802.3-202x" is no lomnger correct - we
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bj/comments/P8023bj-D2p0-Comments_Proposed_byCls_r1.pdf
IEEE P802.3bj D2.0 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable Initial Working Group ballot comments # 12Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E Use of acronyms not in 1.5. FW is broadly used in this document, though pri
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bj/comments/P8023bj-D2p0-Comments_Proposed_byID_r1.pdf
IEEE P802.3bj D2.0 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable Initial Working Group ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 45 SC 45.2.1.92b P 37 L 48 Comment Type T There is a need for an align status bit i