It has been noted by the WG that "there may be editorial changes as a result of late-arriving 1609 WG review, but these docs are stable technically."

I’ll note that we have several topics that are related to other work, however, that may need to stay coordinated, so if anyone has any thoughts on the following, where we should discuss the topic in ARC to allow other parallel work to continue and still stay coordinated, please let me know: -         TGbd’s activities in support of IEEE 1609 -         Nendica and TGbe’s discussion on 802.11 Deterministic Network/Time-Sensitive Networking -         802.1’s work on clarifying EPD/LPD. -         Architecture concepts in TGbc -         Architecture concepts in TGbd -         Is TGbe’s multi-link concept ready for Architecture concepts discussion/review?

Cover Page Using a Light Image IEEE Registration Authority OUI Registry Tiers proposal Glenn Parsons, RAC Chair July 2011 RAC Members  Glenn Parsons, Chair  Geoff Thompson, (LMSC prime) IEEE 802  Clint Chaplin, (LMSC alternate) IEEE 802  Bob Davis, (MSC prime)  Leonard Tsai, (MSC alternate)  Tom Kurihara, (VTS / ITS prime) IEEE 1609  Geoffrey Garner , (I&M prime) IEEE 1588  Gary Robinson, ex-officio (CS SAB) Staff – Angela Thomas, RAC Secretary – Carmen Hernandez, Registrar 2 Current OUI based identifiers • Company_id is a 24-bit OUI value assigned by the IEEE-RA • CDI-32™ is a concatenation of a 24-bit OUI value assigned by the IEEE-RA and an 8-bit extension identifier assigned by the organization with that OUI assignment. • TCDI-40™ is a concatenation of a 24-bit OUI value assigned by the IEEE-RA and a16-bit extension identifier assigned by the organization with that OUI assignment. • MAC-48 (obsolete label) / EUI-48™ is a concatenation of a 24-bit OUI value assigned by the IEEE-RA and a 24-bit extension identifier assigned by the organization with that OUI assignment. • EUI-60 (deprecated) is a concatenation of a 24-bit OUI assigned by the IEEE-RA and a 36-bit extension identifier assigned by the organization with that OUI assignment. • EUI-64™ is a concatenation of the 24-bit or 36-bit OUI value assigned by the IEEE-RA and a 40-bit or 28-bit extension identifier assigned by the organization with that OUI assignment. • IPv6 is a concatenation of a 64-bit EUI-64™ (derived from a MAC-48/EUI-48™) and a 64-bit extension identifier assigned by the device with the MAC-48/EUI-48 ™ assignment.

Thomas Manager Registry Programs IEEE - Standards Activities 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA Phone:   +1 732-562-3813 Fax:   +1 732-562-1571 E-mail:   a.n.thomas@xxxxxxxx ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ Visit our web site at:   http://standards.ieee.org/ IEEE – Advancing Technology for Humanity Follow-Ups : Re: REMINDER: MANDATORY RAC COORDINATION: IEEE P802.15.10/D06™ From: Angela Thomas References : REMINDER: MANDATORY RAC COORDINATION: IEEE P802.15.10/D06™ From: Angela Thomas Re: REMINDER: MANDATORY RAC COORDINATION: IEEE P802.15.10/D06™ From: ROBERT GROW Prev by Date: Ethertype Request - RA1471291961997 Next by Date: Fwd: Revised Agenda for 1609 WG Meeting Previous by thread: Re: REMINDER: MANDATORY RAC COORDINATION: IEEE P802.15.10/D06™ Next by thread: Re: REMINDER: MANDATORY RAC COORDINATION: IEEE P802.15.10/D06™ Index(es): Date Thread

Valery Timofeev Director, Radiocommunication Bureau Annex: 1 Distribution: – Administrations of Member States and Radiocommunication Sector Members – ITU-R Associates participating in the work of Radiocommunication Study Group 9 – Chairmen and Vice-Chairmen of Radiocommunication Study Groups and the Special Committee on Regulatory/Procedural Matters – Chairman and Vice-Chairmen of the Conference Preparatory Meeting – Members of the Radio Regulations Board – Secretary-General of the ITU, Director of the Telecommunication Standardization Bureau, Director of the Telecommunication Development Bureau INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION IEEE L802.16-06/011 - 2 - LITTLE AL:USERS:ROGER:DOCUMENTS:802:802.16:SOURCE FOLDER:SOURCE_LIAISON:L80216-06_011.DOC Annex 1 Titles of the Recommendations approved Recommendation ITU-R F.1330-2 Doc. 9/BL/13 Performance limits for bringing into service of the parts of international plesiochronous digital hierarchy and synchronous digital hierarchy paths and sections implemented by digital fixed wireless systems Recommendation ITU-R F.1093-2 Doc. 9/BL/14 Effects of multipath propagation on the design and operation of line-of-sight digital fixed wireless systems Recommendation ITU-R F.1609-1 Doc. 9/BL/15 Interference evaluation from fixed service systems using high altitude platform stations to conventional fixed service systems in the bands 27.5-28.35 GHz and 31-31.3 GHz Recommendation ITU-R F.382-8 Doc. 9/BL/16 Radio-frequency channel arrangements for fixed wireless systems operating in the 2 and 4 GHz bands Recommendation ITU-R F.384-9 Doc. 9/BL/17 Radio-frequency channel arrangements for medium and high capacity digital fixed wireless systems operating in the upper 6 GHz band Recommendation ITU-R F.699-7 Doc. 9/BL/18 Reference radiation patterns for fixed wireless system antennas for use in coordination studies and interference assessment in the frequency range from 100 MHz to about 70 GHz - 3 - LITTLE AL:USERS:ROGER:DOCUMENTS:802:802.16:SOURCE FOLDER:SOURCE_LIAISON:L80216-06_011.DOC Recommendation ITU-R F.1763 Doc. 9/BL/19 Radio interface standards for broadband wireless access systems in the fixed service operating below 66 GHz Recommendation ITU-R F.1764 Doc. 9/BL/20 Methodology to evaluate interference from fixed service systems using high altitude platform stations (HAPS) to fixed wireless systems in the bands above 3 GHz Recommendation ITU-R F.1765 Doc. 9/BL/21 Methodology for determining the aggregate equivalent isotropically radiated power from point-to-point high-density applications in the fixed service operating in bands above 30 GHz Recommendation ITU-R F.1766 Doc. 9/BL/22 Methodology to determine the probability of a radio astronomy observatory receiving interference based on calculated exclusion zones to protect against interference from point-to-multipoint high-density applications in the fixed service operating in bands around 43 GHz _____________

Liaison Statement from IEEE 802.11 Working Group to ETSI TC ITS Source: IEEE 802.11 Working Group1 November 2018 Date: November 2018 To: Niels Peter Skov Andersen npa@anemonetechnology.com CC: Konstantinos Karachalios Secretary, IEEE-SA Standards Board, Secretary, IEEE-SA Board of Governors sasecretary@ieee.org Paul Nikolich Chair, IEEE 802 LMSC p.nikolich@ieee.org Jon Rosdahl Vice-chair, IEEE 802.11 WLAN Working Group jrosdahl@ieee.org Robert Stacey Vice-chair, IEEE 802.11 WLAN Working Group robert.stacey@intel.com Hans Johansson Chairman, ETSI ERM TG37 hans.johansson@kapsch.net Edgar Figueroa CEO, Wi-Fi Alliance efigueroa@wi-fi.org Andrea Lorelli ETSI Technical officer TC ITS andrea.lorelli@etsi.org Niels Peter Skov Andersen CAR 2 CAR Communication Consortium npa@car-2-car.org Thomas Kurihara Chair, IEEE 1609 tkstds@mindspring.com From: Dorothy Stanley Chair, IEEE 802.11 WLAN Working Group dstanley@ieee.org Subject: Reply Liaison Statement on Next Generation V2X (NGV) Use Cases and Requirements Dear Niels Peter, The IEEE 802.11 Working Group (WG) thanks the ETSI TC ITS for sharing its views on the development of the 802.11 NGV amendment, as described in the 2018 October liaison communication.2 The IEEE 802.11 WG will take into account the views conveyed by ETSI TC ITS regarding the new amendment.

Note (b) - TC on Jun 25 is specifically for joint discussion with IEEE 1609 experts.

It has been noted by the WG that "there may be editorial changes as a result of late-arriving 1609 WG review, but these docs are stable technically."

The files that are located at https://ieee.app.box.com/folder/166341576611 were approved by the 1609 WG today.  

Box 1609,=0D=0A6th Floor, Two Blue Plaza,;Pearl River;New York;10965;USA end:vcard Follow-Ups : Re: [RPRWG] More comments on preemption From: Pankaj K Jha References : RE: [RPRWG] More comments on preemption From: Devendra Tripathi Re: [RPRWG] More comments on preemption From: Denton Gentry Prev by Date: Re: [RPRWG] Uploads & Next Meeting Agenda Next by Date: Re: [RPRWG] More comments on preemption Prev by thread: Re: [RPRWG] More comments on preemption Next by thread: Re: [RPRWG] More comments on preemption Index(es): Date Thread

It has been noted by the WG that "there may be editorial changes as a result of late-arriving 1609 WG review, but these docs are stable technically."

Roger On May 8, 2019 at 8:21:26 AM, Angela Thomas ( a.n.thomas@xxxxxxxx ) wrote: Hello all, This e-mail is to advise you of the opening of IEEE Standards Sponsor Revision Ballot Recirculation - 1 for: Title: Standard for Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE)-Identifiers Scope: This standard defines identifiers for use with the IEEE 1609(TM) series of standards.   

Thomas Manager Registry Programs IEEE - Standards Activities 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA Phone:  +1 732-562-3813 Fax:  +1 732-562-1571 E-mail:   a.n.thomas@xxxxxxxx ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Visit our web site at:   http://standards.ieee.org/ IEEE – Advancing Technology for Humanity ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Angela Thomas < a.n.thomas@xxxxxxxx > Date: Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 8:21 AM Subject: MANDATORY RAC COORDINATION: P1609.12™/D6 To: stds-rac < stds-rac@xxxxxxxx > Hello all, This e-mail is to advise you of the opening of the IEEE Standards Sponsor Ballot for: P1609.12 Title: Standard for Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE)-Identifiers Scope: This standard defines identifiers for use with the IEEE 1609(TM) series of standards. ***** IMPORTANT ***** This is a Revision Ballot.

An outcome from our recent 1609 WG meetings (which included discussions regarding recent PSID allocation requests), was that we realized the form had some significant shortcomings.

Best regards, GeoffG On Jun 5, 2019, at 9:00 AM, Angela Thomas < a.n.thomas@xxxxxxxx > wrote: Hello all, This e-mail is to advise you of the opening of IEEE Standards Sponsor Revision Ballot Recirculation - 2 for: Title: Standard for Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE)-Identifiers Scope: This standard defines identifiers for use with the IEEE 1609(TM) series of standards.   

Section/Clause 4.2 Object Identifier (OID)  references: iso(1) iso-identified-organization(3) ieee(111) standards-association-numbered-series-standards(2) wave-stds(1609)  IE 1.3.111.2.1609   There was a proposal to subdivide the 1.3.111 OID submitted by Tony several years ago. 

Cover Page Using a Light Image IEEE Registration Authority OUI Registry Tiers proposal Glenn Parsons, RAC Chair July 2011 RAC Members  Glenn Parsons, Chair  Geoff Thompson, (LMSC prime) IEEE 802  Clint Chaplin, (LMSC alternate) IEEE 802  Bob Davis, (MSC prime)  Leonard Tsai, (MSC alternate)  Tom Kurihara, (VTS / ITS prime) IEEE 1609  Geoffrey Garner , (I&M prime) IEEE 1588  Gary Robinson, ex-officio (CS SAB) Staff – Angela Thomas, RAC Secretary – Carmen Hernandez, Registrar 2 Current OUI based identifiers • Company_id is a 24-bit OUI value assigned by the IEEE-RA • CDI-32™ is a concatenation of a 24-bit OUI value assigned by the IEEE-RA and an 8-bit extension identifier assigned by the organization with that OUI assignment. • TCDI-40™ is a concatenation of a 24-bit OUI value assigned by the IEEE-RA and a16-bit extension identifier assigned by the organization with that OUI assignment. • MAC-48 (obsolete label) / EUI-48™ is a concatenation of a 24-bit OUI value assigned by the IEEE-RA and a 24-bit extension identifier assigned by the organization with that OUI assignment. • EUI-60 (deprecated) is a concatenation of a 24-bit OUI assigned by the IEEE-RA and a 36-bit extension identifier assigned by the organization with that OUI assignment. • EUI-64™ is a concatenation of the 24-bit or 36-bit OUI value assigned by the IEEE-RA and a 40-bit or 28-bit extension identifier assigned by the organization with that OUI assignment. • IPv6 is a concatenation of a 64-bit EUI-64™ (derived from a MAC-48/EUI-48™) and a 64-bit extension identifier assigned by the device with the MAC-48/EUI-48 ™ assignment.

An outcome from our recent 1609 WG meetings (which included discussions regarding recent PSID allocation requests), was that we realized the form had some significant shortcomings.

Celebrating 125 Years of Engineering the Future:   www.ieee125.org From: Tom Kurihara To: bob@xxxxxxxx, j.t.walker@xxxxxxxx Cc: stds-rac@xxxxxxxx Date: 10/22/2009 04:00 PM Subject: Re: Fw: RAC and Revision of 1609.3 Registration is still needed but changed from 1609.3 to 1609.0, I said non-normative document, but that may change as we develop 1609.0 following the approval of the other 1609 documents.

I will be returning from the San Diego 1609 WG meeting on the 11th to Orlando and will be in Orlando for the remainder of the week.

Box 1609,=0D=0A6th Floor, Two Blue Plaza,;Pearl River;New York;10965;USA end:vcard References : RE: [RPRWG] MAC Question From: Sanjay Agrawal Prev by Date: RE: [RPRWG] MAC Question Next by Date: [RPRWG] temporal ordering requirement Prev by thread: RE: [RPRWG] MAC Question Next by thread: Re: [RPRWG] MAC Question Index(es): Date Thread

I’ll note that we have several topics that are related to other work, however, that may need to stay coordinated, so if anyone has any thoughts on the following, where we should discuss the topic in ARC to allow other parallel work to continue and still stay coordinated, please let me know: TGbd’s activities in support of IEEE 1609 Nendica and TGbe’s discussion on 802.11 Deterministic Network/Time-Sensitive Networking 802.1’s work on clarifying EPD/LPD.

Cover Page Using a Light Image IEEE Registration Authority OUI Registry Tiers proposal Glenn Parsons, RAC Chair July 2011 RAC Members  Glenn Parsons, Chair  Geoff Thompson, (LMSC prime) IEEE 802  Clint Chaplin, (LMSC alternate) IEEE 802  Bob Davis, (MSC prime)  Leonard Tsai, (MSC alternate)  Tom Kurihara, (VTS / ITS prime) IEEE 1609  Geoffrey Garner , (I&M prime) IEEE 1588  Gary Robinson, ex-officio (CS SAB) Staff – Angela Thomas, RAC Secretary – Carmen Hernandez, Registrar 2 Current OUI based identifiers • Company_id is a 24-bit OUI value assigned by the IEEE-RA • CDI-32™ is a concatenation of a 24-bit OUI value assigned by the IEEE-RA and an 8-bit extension identifier assigned by the organization with that OUI assignment. • TCDI-40™ is a concatenation of a 24-bit OUI value assigned by the IEEE-RA and a16-bit extension identifier assigned by the organization with that OUI assignment. • MAC-48 (obsolete label) / EUI-48™ is a concatenation of a 24-bit OUI value assigned by the IEEE-RA and a 24-bit extension identifier assigned by the organization with that OUI assignment. • EUI-60 (deprecated) is a concatenation of a 24-bit OUI assigned by the IEEE-RA and a 36-bit extension identifier assigned by the organization with that OUI assignment. • EUI-64™ is a concatenation of the 24-bit or 36-bit OUI value assigned by the IEEE-RA and a 40-bit or 28-bit extension identifier assigned by the organization with that OUI assignment. • IPv6 is a concatenation of a 64-bit EUI-64™ (derived from a MAC-48/EUI-48™) and a 64-bit extension identifier assigned by the device with the MAC-48/EUI-48 ™ assignment.

Liaison Statement from IEEE 802.11 Working Group to the CAR 2 CAR Communication Consortium Source: IEEE 802.11 Working Group1 Date: November 2018 To: Niels Peter Skov Andersen npa@car-2-car.org CC: Konstantinos Karachalios Secretary, IEEE-SA Standards Board, Secretary, IEEE-SA Board of Governors sasecretary@ieee.org Paul Nikolich Chair, IEEE 802 LMSC p.nikolich@ieee.org Jon Rosdahl Vice-chair, IEEE 802.11 WLAN Working Group jrosdahl@ieee.org Robert Stacey Vice-chair, IEEE 802.11 WLAN Working Group robert.stacey@intel.com Martin Böhm Secretary General, C-Roads Platform Martin.Boehm@austriatech.at Sue Bai SAE DSRC Technical Committee sbai@hra.com Edgar Figueroa CEO, Wi-Fi Alliance efigueroa@wi-fi.org Jason Conley Executive Director, OmniAir Consortium jconley@omniair.org Niels Peter Skov Andersen Chairman, ETSI TC ITS npa@anemonetechnology.com Thomas Kurihara Chair, IEEE 1609 tkstds@mindspring.com From: Dorothy Stanley Chair, IEEE 802.11 WLAN Working Group dstanley@ieee.org Subject: Reply Liaison Statement on Next Generation V2X (NGV) Use Cases and Requirements Dear Niels Peter, The IEEE 802.11 Working Group (WG) thanks the CAR 2 CAR Communication Consortium for sharing its views on the development of the 802.11 NGV amendment, as described in the 2018 October liaison communication.2 The IEEE 802.11 WG will take into account the views conveyed by the CAR 2 CAR Communication Consortium regarding the new amendment.

Follow-Ups : Re: Open Ethertype Issues - Response and/or feedback requested by January 27th From: Karen Lambert References : Re: Open Ethertype Issues - Response and/or feedback requested by January 27th From: ROBERT GROW Re: Open Ethertype Issues - Response and/or feedback requested by January 27th From: Pat Thaler Prev by Date: Fwd: PSID allocation process and criteria (from 1609 WG) Next by Date: Re: Open Ethertype Issues - Response and/or feedback requested by January 27th Previous by thread: Re: Open Ethertype Issues - Response and/or feedback requested by January 27th Next by thread: Re: Open Ethertype Issues - Response and/or feedback requested by January 27th Index(es): Date Thread