IEEE 802 Wireless Interim Meeting - January 2005 February 2007(For May 2007) doc: HRMMtgAnnMay07V1 IEEE 802 Wireless Interim Session May 13-18, 2007 Venue and Hotel Information for the May 2007 IEEE 8
Re: comments needed on withdrawal plans for 8802 Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: comments needed on withdrawal plans for 8802 To : Bob D
doc.: IEEE 802.22-06/0078r0 May 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.22-06/0078r0 IEEE P802.22 Wireless RANs 5 Criteria for Proposed P802.22.2 PAR for the creation of a Recommended Practice for the Installation and De
Re: [802SEC] Resetting the March 2022 registration fee Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: [802SEC] Resetting the March 2022 registration fe
Proposed 802.16e PAR Revision 2004-07-14 IEEE 802.16-04/33r3 1. ASSIGNED PROJECT NUMBER: 802.16e 2. SPONSOR DATE OF REQUEST: 2004-06-29 3. TYPE OF DOCUMENT: Standard 4. TITLE OF DOCUMENT: Amendment to
Re: [802SEC] myballot status for the 802 EC Interim Teleconference -- Ju Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: [802SEC] myballot status for th
[802.3_100GNGOPTX] MMF ad hoc, meeting details Thursday 14 August, 2014, Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index [802.3_100GNGOPTX] MMF ad hoc, meet
Re: [802SEC] LMSC deadbeats Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: [802SEC] LMSC deadbeats To : Bill Quackenbush < billq@attglobal.net > Subjec
RE: Why not have both? Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index RE: Why not have both? To : stds-802-3-hssg@xxxxxxxx Subject : RE: Why not have both?
IEEE 802.3cd report – Sept 2018 Interim Working Group meeting Page 1Version 1.0 IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, and 200 Gb/s Ethernet Report to 802.3 Working Group Spokane, WA Sept 13th, 2018 IEEE 80
Re: [802SEC] +++10-day EC Motion+++ Approval of submission for France AR Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: [802SEC] +++10-day EC Motion+++
Re: PLEASE REVIEW: P1588 sdoId registry files Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: PLEASE REVIEW: P1588 sdoId registry files To : Geoffrey Ga
Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] draft text for "Subcarriers and Resource Allocati Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] draft text f
Re: [802SEC] July waiver for industry connection attendees Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: [802SEC] July waiver for industry connection
Re: [802SEC] Preamble update for 802 LMSC response to adminstrations Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: [802SEC] Preamble update for 802 LM
Motion 10v2.1: Elementary Functions J. Wolff v. Gudenberg November 23, 2009 1 Motion This motion provides a list of elementary functions that should be required for P1788. 1.1 Related Motions We assum
Re: [802SEC] Motion to approve the attached EC position statement regard Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: [802SEC] Motion to approve the
[RPRWG] 802.17 Interim Session May 17,18,19 in Piscataway Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index [RPRWG] 802.17 Interim Session May 17,18,19 in Pis
pimpinella_NGMMF_01_0318 1 In support of 400GBASE-SR8 Broad Market Potential Rick Pimpinella and Brett Lane Panduit Labs, Panduit Corp. Next-gen 200 & 400 Gb/s PHYs over Fewer MMF Pairs Rosemont, Marc
Page 1 of 8 11-November-1996 g IEEE P802.3z Gigabit Task Force Howard M. Frazier, Jr. Impact of Packet Burstin on GMII and PCS Howard M. Frazier, Jr. Sun Microsystems Computer Company Internet and Net
Re: Why not have both? Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: Why not have both? To : HSSG < stds-802-3-hssg@xxxxxxxx > Subject : Re: Why not h
Re: [STDS-802-11-CAC] Motion for Sponsor Ballot Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: [STDS-802-11-CAC] Motion for Sponsor Ballot To : STDS-80
Re: [STDS-802-11-CAC] Joint Session with ARC? Re: [STDS-802-11-CAC] Plea Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: [STDS-802-11-CAC] Joint Session
RE: IAB issue; (not) representing the LMSC Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index RE: IAB issue; (not) representing the LMSC To : "Floyd Backes" <