Overview of IEEE P802.16m Technology and Candidate RIT for IMT-Advanced 1 OVERVIEW OF IEEE P802.16m TECHNOLOGY AND CANDIDATE RIT FOR IMT-ADVANCED IEEE 802.16 IMT-Advanced Evaluation Group Coordination
IEEE 802.3by D3.1 25 Gb/s Ethernet 1st Sponsor recirculation ballot comments Proposed Response # r01-1Cl 045 SC 45.2.1.97 P 42 L 3 Comment Type E Remove editors note as it says it is to be removed in
Unapproved Minutes - July 2022 IEEE P802.3df 200 Gb/s, 400 Gb/s, 800 Gb/s, and 1.6 Tb/s Ethernet Task Force Unapproved Meeting Minutes, prepared by John D’Ambrosia, Mark Nowell, and Kent Lusted 1
Approved Minutes - July 2022 IEEE P802.3df 200 Gb/s, 400 Gb/s, 800 Gb/s, and 1.6 Tb/s Ethernet Task Force Approved Meeting Minutes, prepared by John D’Ambrosia, Mark Nowell, and Kent Lusted 12 Ju
MainTable IEEE P802.3cu D3.0 100 Gb/s per wavelength on SMF Initial Sponsor ballot comments # I-7Cl FM SC FM P1 L10 Comment Type E I think Mr. Law has assigned this project an amendment number. Sugges
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.1 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 00 SC 0 P12 L47 Comment Type E If you look at the 802.3cy project, it st
IEEE P802.3br (D2.0) Interspersing Express Traffic Initial Working Group ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 00 SC 0 P 1 L 24 Comment Type E This will be an amendment to IEEE Std 802.3-201x (the o
MainTable IEEE P802.3cb 2.5 Gb/s and 5 Gb/s Backplane Initial Working Group ballot comments D2p0 Response # 1Cl 128 SC 7.1.6 P 109 L 41 Comment Type ER The cluase deals with common mode output return
MainTable IEEE P802.3cb 2.5 Gb/s and 5 Gb/s Backplane Initial Working Group ballot comments D2p0 # 2Cl SC 1 P 30 L 38 Comment Type E Editing instruction: suggest changing "in after" to "after". Same f
MainTable IEEE P802.3cb 2.5 Gb/s and 5 Gb/s Backplane Initial Working Group ballot comments D2p0 # 2Cl SC 1 P 30 L 38 Comment Type E Editing instruction: suggest changing "in after" to "after". Same f
MainTable IEEE P802.3cb 2.5 Gb/s and 5 Gb/s Backplane Initial Working Group ballot comments D2p0 Response # 1Cl 128 SC 7.1.6 P 109 L 41 Comment Type ER The cluase deals with common mode output return
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.1 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments # 231Cl FM SC FM P10 L16 Comment Type E "physical layer" should be capitalized SuggestedRemedy C
MainTable IEEE P802.3at D3.0 PoEplus comments Response # 1Cl 33E SC 33E P 151 L 10 Comment Type E Include a reference to channel DC resistance unbalance specifications defined by TIA. SuggestedRemedy
MainTable IEEE P802.3at D3.0 PoEplus comments # 467Cl 00 SC 00 P L Comment Type ER The current ballot claims that it is referenced against P802.3ay Draft 2.1. As of the date of the close of this ballo
MainTable IEEE P802.3at D4.0 PoEplus comments # 24Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type G For readers' comprehension, please add informative annex which describes relationship between exsiting 802.3af devices a
IEEE P802.3bj D2.0 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable Initial Working Group ballot comments # 12Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E Use of acronyms not in 1.5. FW is broadly used in this document, though pri
MainTable IEEE P802.3at D4.0 PoEplus comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 25 SC 25.4.4a.1 P 19 L 51 Comment Type G Draft D4 Figure 25-1 title: The title use "test fixture" and the text in Note 1 use "test
MainTable comments # 280Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E SuggestedRemedy Comment Status X Response Status O NoName Proposed Response # 205Cl 00 SC P 2 L 1 Comment Type E Add note to balloters to indicate t
MainTable IEEE P802.3br (D2.0) Interspersing Express Traffic Initial Working Group ballot comments # 292Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E The attribute aMACMergeStatusTx contains the direction "Tx". Should
MainTable IEEE 802.3av D1.1 10G EPON comments IEEE 802.3av Draft 1.1 Initial Comments Input # 825Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type TR There should be test vectors for the RS(255, 223) code SuggestedRemedy I
IEEE P802.3bj D2.0 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable Initial Working Group ballot comments Response # 1Cl 45 SC 45.2.1.92b P 37 L 48 Comment Type T There is a need for an align status bit in the Tx