118132 results found. results are sorted by relevance
  376-400
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bq/comments/8023bq_d3p0_Topic_proposed.pdf
IEEE P802.3bq D3.0 25G/40GBASE-T Ethernet Initial Sponsor ballot comments i-97Cl 113 SC 113.11 P 196 L 27 Comment Type TR Equation 44-1 and Table 44-3 are specific to 10 Gb/s. For higher bit rates, th
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/by/public/comments/8023by_D10_comment_final_responses_by_clause.pdf
IEEE 802.3by D1.0 25 Gb/s Ethernet 2nd Task Force review comments # 66Cl 000 SC 0 P L Comment Type E The PDF Document Properties are not filled in completely: Title: IEEE P802.3xx name of Task Force S
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/ch/comments/P8023ch_D2p1_comments_by_Comment_ID_proposed_responses.pdf
MainTable D2.1 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 2.5 Gb/s, 5 Gb/s, and 10 Gb/s Autom P802.3ch D2.1 Proposed Response # 1Cl 45 SC 45.2.1 P 32 L 31 Comment Type T The definitio
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/minutes/2015_03/2015_0309_Open_Minutes_R1.pdf
1 | P a g e MINUTES (Unconfirmed) IEEE 802 LMSC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING, Revision 1 Prepared by John D’Ambrosia, Recording Secretary Monday, March 9, 2015 – 8:00 a.m. All times CET Estrel Berlin B
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cw/comments/D2p1/8023cw_D2p1_comments_bucket1_by_clause.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.1 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments # 231Cl FM SC FM P 10 L 16 Comment Type E "physical layer" should be capitalized SuggestedRemedy
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/17/projects/P802_17b/P802_17b_MIB.txt
IEEE-802DOT17-RPR-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN IMPORTS MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, Integer32, Counter32, Counter64, Unsigned32 FROM SNMPv2-SMI MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP FROM SNMPv2-CONF MacAddres
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/by/public/comments/8023by_D10_comment_final_responses_by_ID.pdf
IEEE 802.3by D1.0 25 Gb/s Ethernet 2nd Task Force review comments Response # 1Cl 045 SC 45.2.1.102.1 P 43 L 16 Comment Type E "alignment markers lock" should be "alignment marker lock" SuggestedRemedy
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bq/comments/8023bq_d3p0_Clause_proposed.pdf
IEEE P802.3bq D3.0 25G/40GBASE-T Ethernet Initial Sponsor ballot comments # i-89Cl 0 SC 0 P L Comment Type TR The style manual says "...the use of the word must is deprecated and shall not be used whe
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/by/public/comments/8023by_D10_comment_proposed_responses_by_clause.pdf
IEEE 802.3by D1.0 25 Gb/s Ethernet 2nd Task Force review comments # 66Cl 000 SC 0 P L Comment Type E The PDF Document Properties are not filled in completely: Title: IEEE P802.3xx name of Task Force S
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/minutes/2016_07/2016_0729_Close_Minutes_R0.pdf
1 | P a g e MINUTES (Unconfirmed) IEEE 802 LMSC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING, Revision 0 Prepared by John D’Ambrosia, Recording Secretary Friday, Jul 29, 2016 – 1p.m. All times PDT Grand Hyatt San Dieg
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/at/comments/D3.0/P802d3at_D3p0_midmtg2_by_ID.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3at D3.0 PoEplus comments Response # 1Cl 33E SC 33E P 151 L 10 Comment Type E Include a reference to channel DC resistance unbalance specifications defined by TIA. SuggestedRemedy
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/at/comments/D3.0/P802d3at_D3p0_midmtg2_by_clause.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3at D3.0 PoEplus comments # 467Cl 00 SC 00 P L Comment Type ER The current ballot claims that it is referenced against P802.3ay Draft 2.1. As of the date of the close of this ballo
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/at/comments/D4.0/P802d3at_D4p0_postmtg_by_clause.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3at D4.0 PoEplus comments # 178Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type GR The impulse value of 1.5 kV 10/700 is too low for the above reasons. Compliance only to the lower 1.5 kV 10/700 condit
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cw/comments/D2p0/8023cw_D2p0_comments_final_rewrite_bucket_by_clause.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.0 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems Initial Working Group ballot comments # 581Cl 120A SC 120A.6 P 103 L 43 Comment Type E two 400GMII and 400GAUI-8 interfaces SuggestedRemedy Only
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/at/comments/D4.0/P802d3at_D4p0_postmtg_by_ID.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3at D4.0 PoEplus comments Response # 1Cl 25 SC 25.4.4a.1 P 19 L 51 Comment Type G Draft D4 Figure 25-1 title: The title use "test fixture" and the text in Note 1 use "test circuit"
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bj/comments/P8023bj-D1p3-Comments_Received_byID.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.3 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 4th Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 91 SC 91.5.4.2.1 P 145 L 49 Comment Type E Missing word? "received on at 2 PCS l
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cw/comments/D2p1/8023cw_D2p1_comments_final_by_ID_230619.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.1 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments Response # 1Cl 00 SC 0 P 12 L 47 Comment Type E If you look at the 802.3cy project, it states th
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cw/comments/D2p1/8023cw_D2p1_comments_final_so_far_June_1_by_ID.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.1 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments Response # 1Cl 00 SC 0 P 12 L 47 Comment Type E If you look at the 802.3cy project, it states th
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cw/comments/D2p1/8023cw_D2p1_comments_final_so_far_June_1_by_clause.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.1 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments # 231Cl FM SC FM P 10 L 16 Comment Type E "physical layer" should be capitalized SuggestedRemedy
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cw/comments/D2p1/8023cw_D2p1_comments_final_by_ID.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.1 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments Response # 1Cl 00 SC 0 P 12 L 47 Comment Type E If you look at the 802.3cy project, it states th
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/z/public/comments/d4/012798Detail.pdf
MainTable P802.3z Draft 4 Comments # 210Cl 00 SC 00.iv P iv L 24 Comment Type E Symbol for Boolean XOR is listed as ( )̂. This conflicts with the symbol given in 802.3x/802.3y documents, which is a pl
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cw/comments/D2p1/8023cw_D2p1_comments_final_by_clause_230619.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.1 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments # 231Cl FM SC FM P 10 L 16 Comment Type E "physical layer" should be capitalized SuggestedRemedy
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cw/comments/D2p1/8023cw_D2p1_comments_final_by_clause.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.1 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments # 231Cl FM SC FM P 10 L 16 Comment Type E "physical layer" should be capitalized SuggestedRemedy
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bj/comments/P8023bj-D1p3-Comments_Received_byCls.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.3 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 4th Task Force review comments # 67Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type E Some hyperlinks to Figures and Tables within the document do not work.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cd/comments/8023cd_D10_comment_proposed_responses_by_clause.pdf
IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, 200 Gb/s Ethernet 1st Task Force review comments # 69Cl FM SC FM P 15 L 2 Comment Type E In the table of contents, there is no space between clause number and clause t