IEEE P802.3df D1.1 2nd Task Force review comments # 47Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 31 Comment Type E "adds MAC parameters, Physical Layers, and management parameters" but we talk about "the Physical Layer" like
MainTable IEEE P802.3cg D3.0 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 10 Mb/s Operation and Associated Power Delivery over a Single Balanced Pair of Conductors Initial Sponsor ballo
MainTable IEEE 802.3av d2.2 10G-EPON comments IEEE 802.3av Draft 2.2 Final Responses # 2868Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type E Confusing for abreviation: RS=Reconciliation Sublayer vs. RS=Reed-Solomon Sugge
IEEE P802.3bt D3.3 4-Pair Power over Ethernet 3rd Sponsor recirculation ballot comments Proposed Response # r03-1Cl 0 SC 0 P L Comment Type E The base_year variable appears to be set correctly as 201x
IEEE P802.3bz D1.1 2.5G/5GBASE-T 2nd Task Force review comments # 100Cl 00 SC 0 P 1 L 1 Comment Type E Please provide the option of using the new comment spreadsheet at the URL
IEEE 802.3by D2.1 25 Gb/s Ethernet 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 108 SC 5.2.4 P 106 L 15 Comment Type T CL 108.5.2.4 In 802.3bj, CL 91.5.3.7 (AM mapping and i
IEEE P802.3bt D3.3 4-Pair Power over Ethernet 3rd Sponsor recirculation ballot comments r03-1Cl 0 SC 0 P L Comment Type E The base_year variable appears to be set correctly as 201x in the front matter
IEEE P802.3df D1.1 2nd Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 124 SC 124.8.5 P 107 L 1 Comment Type TR The text in the last bullet under 124.8.5 "The 400GBASE-DR4-2 or 800GBASE-DR8-2 trans
IEEE 802.3by D2.1 25 Gb/s Ethernet 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments # 88Cl FM SC FM P 11 L 17 Comment Type E One would reasonably assume that "the existing base standard and its amendme
IEEE P802.3bz D1.1 2.5G/5GBASE-T 2nd Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 126 SC 126.7.2 P 167 L 25 Comment Type T There are factors of 4 in equations 126-10, 126-11, 126-21, 126-22, 126
MainTable IEEE P802.3cb 2.5 Gb/s and 5 Gb/s Backplane Initial Working Group ballot comments D2p0 # 120Cl FM SC P 1 L 18 Comment Type E Extraneous "." at the end of the amendment title SuggestedRemedy
MainTable IEEE P802.3aq Comments 18/ # 4Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E Readability and comprehension are challenged by the tight formatting. Currently, the reader is required to scan and jump several pag
MainTable IEEE P802.3cb 2.5 Gb/s and 5 Gb/s Backplane Initial Working Group ballot comments D2p0 Proposed Response # 1Cl 128 SC 7.1.6 P 109 L 41 Comment Type ER The cluase deals with common mode outpu
January 1992 Doc: IEEE P802.1l/92-xx IEEE 802.11 Wireless Access Method and Physical Layer Specifications Wireless Local Area Network Requirements IEEE Project 802.11 K. Biba (ed.) Abstract An effecti
MainTable comments # 280Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E SuggestedRemedy Comment Status X Response Status O NoName Proposed Response # 169Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type TR The objectives state that we will su
MainTable IEEE P802.3az D1.0 Energy Efficient Ethernet comments IEEE P802.3az D1.0 Nov 2008 # 243Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type E at the risk of getting the 8-ball, I think we should be consistent about
IEEE 802.3 comment tool IEEE P802.3bp D1.4 1000BASE-T1 PHY 5th Task Force review commentsApproved Responses # 504Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type E Is there supposed to be a period after heach item in a De
MainTable IEEE P802.3az D1.0 Energy Efficient Ethernet comments IEEE P802.3az D1.0 Nov 2008 Proposed Response # 1Cl 24 SC 24.4.1 P 49 L 53 Comment Type T Saying '100BASE-X supports Low Power Idle mode
MainTable IEEE P802.3az D3.0 Energy Efficient Ethernet comments Comments received Proposed Response # 1Cl 55 SC 55.4.6.5 P 217 L 34 Comment Type E Comment 9 against D 2.3 was not fully implemented Sug
IEEE P802.3cy D2.0 10G+ Auto Task Force Initial Working Group ballot commentsApproved Responses # 447Cl FM SC FM P 1 L Comment Type E The FrameMaker template has been updated to Version 5.1 by Pete An