Untitled Document October, 2002 IEEE P802.15-02/392r13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 ct in.

The PNC then set the bit for the DEV in the SPS IE that corresponds to a virtual SPS set 0 (0 means HIBER mode).

MainTable P802.3ah Draft 2.0 Comments # 952Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type TR What is being proposed in many places throughout this draft is not a peer network.

doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/0686r0 May, 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/0686r0 IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs Approved Minutes of the IEEE P802.11 Full Working Group Date: 2006-05-15 Author(s): Name Company Address Phone email Tim Godfrey Freescale Semiconductor +1-913-664-2544 Abstract Minutes of the 802.11 full working group.

MainTable P802.3ah Draft 2.0 Comments # 951Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type TR I have a problem with the use of the term "loopback" for the diagnostic return path being proposed for the OAM sublayer.

The RX-to-TX time virtually eliminates the possibility of software playing a significant role.

802.15.2/D5 ClauseList Editor Email Owner Chief NoWritten NoAction NoSig TRproblem Done "00","01","02","03","04","05","06","07" David Cypher david.cypher@nist.gov true true 0 0 0 0 0 "08","09","10","11","12" David Cypher david.cypher@nist.gov true true 0 0 0 0 0 "A","B" David Cypher david.cypher@nist.gov true true 0 0 0 0 0 ALL false false 0 0 0 0 0 CHECK false false Email MessageSubject MsgBody Full NextCommentID OldCommentID 1 0 CommenterName CommenterEmail CommenterPhone CommenterFax CommenterCo Clause Subclause Page Line CommentType Comment SuggestedRemedy CommentStatus ResponseStatus Response Topic CreateDate LastModDate DispatchDate WrittenDate Accept_RejectDate Closed_UnsatisfDate VoterStatus CommentID Seals, Michael mseals@intersil.com 321-724-7172 Intersil 00 00 I 43 E ""Committee of the IEEE Society"", and ""Abstract"" are in incorrect position.

IEEE Draft P802.17/D0.3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 Residential Ethernet (RE) (a working paper) The following paper represents an initial attempt to codify the content of multiple IEEE 802.3 Residential Ethernet (RE) Study Group slide presenta- tions.

The RX-to-TX time virtually eliminates the possibility of software playing a significant role.

doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/1055r0 Sept 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/1055r0 IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs Tentative Minutes of the IEEE P802.11 Full Working Group Sept 13 - 17, 2004 Estrel Hotel, Berlin, Germany 9th Joint 802 Wireless Opening Plenary: Monday, Sept 13, 2004 1.1.

IEEE 802.16m Evaluation Methodology Document (EMD) 2008-07-03 IEEE 802.16m-08/004r2 1 Project IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group Title IEEE 802.16m Evaluation Methodology Document (EMD) Date Submitted 2008-07-03 Source(s) Editor: Roshni Srinivasan, Intel Corporation Jeff Zhuang, Motorola (Section 3) Louay Jalloul, Beceem Communications (Section 4) Robert Novak, Nortel Networks (Section 5,6,7,8) Jeongho Park, Samsung Electronics (Section 10) roshni.m.srinivasan@intel.com jeff.zhuang@motorola.com jalloul@beceem.com rnovak@nortel.com jeongho.jh.park@samsung.com Re: Evaluation Methodology for P802.16m-Advanced Air Interface Abstract This document is the approved baseline 802.16m Evaluation Methodology.

Project 802.16m Evaluation Methodology Document (EMD) 2008-03-04 IEEE 802.16m-08/004 1 Project IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group Title Project 802.16m Evaluation Methodology Document (EMD) Date Submitted 2008-03-04 Source(s) Editor: Roshni Srinivasan, Intel Corporation Jeff Zhuang, Motorola (Section 3) Louay Jalloul, Beceem Communications (Section 4) Robert Novak, Nortel Networks (Section 5,6,7,8) Jeongho Park, Samsung Electronics (Section 10) roshni.m.srinivasan@intel.com jeff.zhuang@motorola.com jalloul@beceem.com rnovak@nortel.com jeongho.jh.park@samsung.com Re: Evaluation Methodology for P802.16m-Advanced Air Interface Abstract This document is the approved baseline 802.16m Evaluation Methodology.

Project 802.16m Evaluation Methodology Document (EMD) 2008-03-17 IEEE 802.16m-08/004r1 1 Project IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group Title IEEE 802.16m Evaluation Methodology Document (EMD) Date Submitted 2008-03-17 Source(s) Editor: Roshni Srinivasan, Intel Corporation Jeff Zhuang, Motorola (Section 3) Louay Jalloul, Beceem Communications (Section 4) Robert Novak, Nortel Networks (Section 5,6,7,8) Jeongho Park, Samsung Electronics (Section 10) roshni.m.srinivasan@intel.com jeff.zhuang@motorola.com jalloul@beceem.com rnovak@nortel.com jeongho.jh.park@samsung.com Re: Evaluation Methodology for P802.16m-Advanced Air Interface Abstract This document is the approved baseline 802.16m Evaluation Methodology.

02392r11P802-15_TG3-LB19-running-comment-resolutions.fm October, 2002 IEEE P802.15-02/392r11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 t in.

Microsoft Word - EPSG WDP 304 V-1-1-4 openSAFETY Safety Profile Specification EPSG Working Draft Proposal 304 V1.1.4 EPSG WDP 304 V-1-1-4 1/184 EPSG Working Draft Proposal 304 1 openSAFETY 2 Safety Profile Specification 3 Version 1.1.4 4 © EPSG 5 (Ethernet POWERLINK Standardisation Group) 6 2011 7 8 openSAFETY Safety Profile Specification EPSG Working Draft Proposal 304 V1.1.4 EPSG WDP 304 V-1-1-4 2/184 9 10 11 12 13 14 EPSG (Ethernet POWERLINK Standardisation Group) 15 16 17 POWERLINK-Office of the EPSG 18 Kurfuerstenstrasse 112 19 D-10787 Berlin 20 Germany 21 22 23 Phone +49.30.850885-29 24 Fax +49.30.850885-86 25 info@ethernet-powerlink.org 26 www.ethernet-powerlink.org 27 openSAFETY Safety Profile Specification EPSG Working Draft Proposal 304 V1.1.4 EPSG WDP 304 V-1-1-4 3/184 Disclaimer 28 Use of this EPSG Standard is wholly voluntary.

IEEE P802.3bt D3.1 4-Pair PoE 1st Sponsor recirculation ballot comments r01-60Cl 1 SC 1.4.338 P 24 L 40 Comment Type ER We pulled in the definition of PSE as modified by 802.3bu.

MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.3 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 4th Task Force review comments Response # 1Cl 91 SC 91.5.4.2.1 P 145 L 49 Comment Type E Missing word?

MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.3 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 4th Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 91 SC 91.5.4.2.1 P 145 L 49 Comment Type E Missing word?

MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.3 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 4th Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 91 SC 91.5.4.2.1 P 145 L 49 Comment Type E Missing word?

MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.3 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 4th Task Force review comments # 50Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type E The Working Group maintains a list of preferred spellings on its web pages.

MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.3 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 4th Task Force review comments # 50Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type E The Working Group maintains a list of preferred spellings on its web pages.

MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.3 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 4th Task Force review comments # 67Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type E Some hyperlinks to Figures and Tables within the document do not work.

MainTable P802.3ah Draft 2.0 Comments # 952Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type TR What is being proposed in many places throughout this draft is not a peer network.

Untitled Document October, 2002 IEEE P802.15-02/392r16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 ct in.

Untitled Document October, 2002 IEEE P802.15-02/392r15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 ct in.