118056 results found. results are sorted by relevance
  251-275
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/by/public/comments/8023by_D10_comment_proposed_responses_by_clause.pdf
IEEE 802.3by D1.0 25 Gb/s Ethernet 2nd Task Force review comments # 66Cl 000 SC 0 P L Comment Type E The PDF Document Properties are not filled in completely: Title: IEEE P802.3xx name of Task Force S
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/minutes/2016_07/2016_0729_Close_Minutes_R0.pdf
1 | P a g e MINUTES (Unconfirmed) IEEE 802 LMSC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING, Revision 0 Prepared by John D’Ambrosia, Recording Secretary Friday, Jul 29, 2016 – 1p.m. All times PDT Grand Hyatt San Dieg
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/at/comments/D3.0/P802d3at_D3p0_midmtg2_by_ID.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3at D3.0 PoEplus comments Response # 1Cl 33E SC 33E P 151 L 10 Comment Type E Include a reference to channel DC resistance unbalance specifications defined by TIA. SuggestedRemedy
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/at/comments/D3.0/P802d3at_D3p0_midmtg2_by_clause.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3at D3.0 PoEplus comments # 467Cl 00 SC 00 P L Comment Type ER The current ballot claims that it is referenced against P802.3ay Draft 2.1. As of the date of the close of this ballo
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/at/comments/D4.0/P802d3at_D4p0_postmtg_by_clause.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3at D4.0 PoEplus comments # 178Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type GR The impulse value of 1.5 kV 10/700 is too low for the above reasons. Compliance only to the lower 1.5 kV 10/700 condit
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cw/comments/D2p0/8023cw_D2p0_comments_final_rewrite_bucket_by_clause.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.0 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems Initial Working Group ballot comments # 581Cl 120A SC 120A.6 P 103 L 43 Comment Type E two 400GMII and 400GAUI-8 interfaces SuggestedRemedy Only
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/at/comments/D4.0/P802d3at_D4p0_postmtg_by_ID.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3at D4.0 PoEplus comments Response # 1Cl 25 SC 25.4.4a.1 P 19 L 51 Comment Type G Draft D4 Figure 25-1 title: The title use "test fixture" and the text in Note 1 use "test circuit"
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bj/comments/P8023bj-D1p3-Comments_Received_byID.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.3 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 4th Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 91 SC 91.5.4.2.1 P 145 L 49 Comment Type E Missing word? "received on at 2 PCS l
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cw/comments/D2p1/8023cw_D2p1_comments_final_by_ID_230619.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.1 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments Response # 1Cl 00 SC 0 P 12 L 47 Comment Type E If you look at the 802.3cy project, it states th
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cw/comments/D2p1/8023cw_D2p1_comments_final_so_far_June_1_by_ID.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.1 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments Response # 1Cl 00 SC 0 P 12 L 47 Comment Type E If you look at the 802.3cy project, it states th
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cw/comments/D2p1/8023cw_D2p1_comments_final_so_far_June_1_by_clause.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.1 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments # 231Cl FM SC FM P 10 L 16 Comment Type E "physical layer" should be capitalized SuggestedRemedy
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cw/comments/D2p1/8023cw_D2p1_comments_final_by_ID.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.1 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments Response # 1Cl 00 SC 0 P 12 L 47 Comment Type E If you look at the 802.3cy project, it states th
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/z/public/comments/d4/012798Detail.pdf
MainTable P802.3z Draft 4 Comments # 210Cl 00 SC 00.iv P iv L 24 Comment Type E Symbol for Boolean XOR is listed as ( )̂. This conflicts with the symbol given in 802.3x/802.3y documents, which is a pl
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cw/comments/D2p1/8023cw_D2p1_comments_final_by_clause_230619.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.1 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments # 231Cl FM SC FM P 10 L 16 Comment Type E "physical layer" should be capitalized SuggestedRemedy
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cw/comments/D2p1/8023cw_D2p1_comments_final_by_clause.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.1 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments # 231Cl FM SC FM P 10 L 16 Comment Type E "physical layer" should be capitalized SuggestedRemedy
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bj/comments/P8023bj-D1p3-Comments_Received_byCls.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.3 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 4th Task Force review comments # 67Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type E Some hyperlinks to Figures and Tables within the document do not work.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cd/comments/8023cd_D10_comment_proposed_responses_by_clause.pdf
IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, 200 Gb/s Ethernet 1st Task Force review comments # 69Cl FM SC FM P 15 L 2 Comment Type E In the table of contents, there is no space between clause number and clause t
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/20/DropBox/802.20%20requirements%20Document%20rev%207.doc
spastyle.doc P< signatdeion >D< number > {INSERT DATE} {INSERT DATE} P< designation >D< number > IEEE P 802.20™/PD/V<7> Date: Draft 802.20 Permanent Document <802
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bq/comments/p802.3bq_2.1_CommentID_proposed_responses.pdf
IEEE P802.3bq D2.1 Physical Layer and Management Parameters for 40Gb/s Operation, Type 40GBASE-T 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 113 SC 113.3.6.4 P 117 L 37 Com
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bx/comments/P8023-D3p0-Comments_Proposed_byID_r1.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3 (IEEE 802.3bx) Revision to IEEE Std 802.3-2012 Initial Sponsor ballot comments Proposed Response # i-1Cl 76 SC 76.3.2.5.2 P 622 L 54 Comment Type TR Definition of SH_DATA and SH_
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/az/comments/802p3azd2p2proposed-2.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3az D2.2 Energy Efficient Ethernet commentsProposed responses Jan 2010 Proposed Response # 1Cl 36 SC 36.2.5.2.2 P 83 L 13 Comment Type TR Branches from LPI_IDLE_D, LPI_K, RX_WAKE,
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/ba/public/mar09/P8023ba-D12_Proposed_Responses_byID.pdf
802.3ae IEEE P802.3ba D1.2 40Gb/s and 100Gb/s Ethernet comments Draft 1.2 Comments Task force Review Proposed Response # 1Cl 82 SC 82.2.4.4 P 170 L 15 Comment Type T 'TXC or RXC' is not specified for
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/df/comments/D1p0/8023df_D1p0_comments_bucket1_clause.pdf
IEEE P802.3df D1.0 1st Task Force review comments # 110Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 10 Comment Type E "Amendment:" - there should be an amendment number here. According to pages 13 and 14, this would be number 1
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bq/comments/p802.3bq_2.1_Clause_proposed_responses.pdf
IEEE P802.3bq D2.1 Physical Layer and Management Parameters for 40Gb/s Operation, Type 40GBASE-T 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments # 119Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type TR Motion 32 at the 80
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/ae/comments/d4.3/D4.3_comment.pdf
IEEE P802.3ae/D4.3 comment responses P802.3ae Draft 4.3 Comments # 71Cl 00 SC 52 P 481 L 12 Comment Type E This is a resubmission and update of a comment I made on D4.2 which was overlooked. Why are F