MainTable P802.3af Draft 4.1 Comments # 68Cl 01 SC 1.4 P 2 L 29 Comment Type TR Definitions are needed for Power Sourcing Equipment and Powered Device. I submitted an editorial comment on this in the
March 1992 Doc: IEEE P802.11·92/45 Tentative Minutes of the IEEE P802.11 Working Group Plenary Meeting Irvine, CA March 9·12, 1992 Monday, March 9, 1992, PM The meeting was called to order at 3:30 PM.
IEEE P802.3bt D3.2 4P PoE 2nd Sponsor recirculation ballot comments r02-24Cl FM SC FM P 19 L 2 Comment Type E OOS Missing space in TOC: 145.2.10 PSE Maintain .... SuggestedRemedy Add space PROPOSED AC
IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, 200 Gb/s Ethernet 1st Task Force review comments # 69Cl FM SC FM P 15 L 2 Comment Type E In the table of contents, there is no space between clause number and clause t
MainTable IEEE P802.3ba D1.2 40Gb/s and 100Gb/s Ethernet comments Draft 1.2 Comments Task force Review # 114Cl 45 SC 45.2.1.12b P 51 L 48 Comment Type T Draft says "Register 1.19, bit 14 indicates tha
MainTable IEEE P802.3az D2.2 Energy Efficient Ethernet commentsProposed responses Jan 2010 # 72Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type ER It has been agreed with staff that where a subclause is inserted prior to
IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, 200 Gb/s Ethernet 1st Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 091 SC 91.6.2a P 86 L 11 Comment Type E It should be bit 1.200.3 rather than 1.200.2 Suggested
IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, 200 Gb/s Ethernet 1st Task Force review comments Response # 1Cl 091 SC 91.6.2a P 86 L 11 Comment Type E It should be bit 1.200.3 rather than 1.200.2 SuggestedRemedy Ch
MainTable IEEE P802.3an D3.1 10GBASE-T Comments # 15Cl 00 SC 0 P 0 L 0 Comment Type E P. Dawe - Editorials; capitals, column widths, font sizes, odd marks in figures, front matter, 802.3-2005 vs 802.3
IEEE P802.3bq D2.1 Physical Layer and Management Parameters for 40Gb/s Operation, Type 40GBASE-T 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments 56Cl 45 SC 45.2.7.10 P 44 L 20 Comment Type TR Markup o
IEEE P802.3cy D3.0 10G+ Auto Task Force Initial Sponsor ballot commentsProposed Responses I-1Cl 0 SC 0 P 1 L 0 Comment Type G It seems unlikely that .3cw (Amendment #8) is approved before .3cy (Amendm
spastyle.doc IEEE C802.20 Version 17 Evaluation Criteria P< signatdeion >D< number > {INSERT DATE} {INSERT DATE} P< designation >D< number > Project IEEE 802.20 Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wirel
Comments Processed: Working Group Review of IEEE 802.16.1-00/01r4 1999-11-10 IEEE 802.16s0-99/5 Page Number Line Number: Item Number: 1 Commentor Name: Gupta Rakesh Description of Edi A minimal subset
MainTable comments # 280Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E SuggestedRemedy Comment Status X Response Status O NoName Proposed Response # 205Cl 00 SC P 2 L 1 Comment Type E Add note to balloters to indicate t
spastyle.doc IEEE C802.20 Version 17 Evaluation Criteria P< signatdeion >D< number > {INSERT DATE} {INSERT DATE} P< designation >D< number > Project IEEE 802.20 Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wirel
IEEE P802.16m/D8 Sponsor Ballot Recirc Comment Database 2010/10/06 Adopt contribution C802.16m-10/0985.doc or its latest revision Suggested Remedy To improve the multi-BS MIMO sounding phase calibrati
Network Working Group S. Sreemanthula (Ed.) Internet-Draft Nokia Expires: September 7, 2006 G. Daley Panasonic S. Faccin Nokia E. Hepworth Siemens/Roke Manor Research S. Das Telcordia March 06, 2006 R
IEEE P802.3bq D2.3 25G/40GBASE-T Ethernet 3rd Working Group recirculation ballot comments 1Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type E Now that the 802.3bx revision has been approved by the IEEE SASB, the "base_yea
doc.: IEEE 802.18-03-0041-00-0000 July 2003 doc.: IEEE 802.18-03-0041-00-0000 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Revision of Parts 2 and 15 of the Com
Final resolutions to comments against Draft 1.0 IEEE P802.3ap draft 1.0 Comments # 39Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E PICS for Clauses 70 through 73 are no longer aligned with the text. SuggestedRemedy Re-
Re: [802.3_NGMMF] what offsets occur for connectors which meet our speci Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: [802.3_NGMMF] what offsets occu