118056 results found. results are sorted by relevance
  76-100
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cy/comments/802d3cy_D3_0_approved_WIP_2.pdf
IEEE P802.3cy D3.0 10G+ Auto Task Force Initial Sponsor ballot commentsProposed Responses I-1Cl 0 SC 0 P 1 L 0 Comment Type G It seems unlikely that .3cw (Amendment #8) is approved before .3cy (Amendm
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/by/public/comments/8023by_D10_comment_received_by_clause.pdf
IEEE 802.3by D1.0 25 Gb/s Ethernet 2nd Task Force review comments # 192Cl 000 SC 0 P L Comment Type E Presumably this is an amendment to what is presently 802.3bx, which is further towards ratificatio
Joint Meeting of the IEEE P802.3cw, P802.3df , P802.3dj Task Forces - Unapproved meeting minutes
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/dj/public/23_05/minutes_3cwdfdj_2305_unapproved.pdf
Joint Meeting of the IEEE P802.3cw, P802.3df , P802.3dj Task Forces - Unapproved meeting minutes Joint Meeting of the IEEE P802.3cw DWDM Systems Task Force, IEEE P802.3df 400 Gb/s and 800 Gb/s Etherne
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cb/comments/IEEE_P802d3cb_D3p0_Cmt_Resolution_by_CL_20170818_1701.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cb D3.0 2.5 Gb/s and 5 Gb/s Operation over Backplane Initial Sponsor ballot comments # i-96Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 3 Comment Type E Now that the likely approval order has become clearer
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/df/comments/D1p1/8023df_D1p1_comments_final_id.pdf
IEEE P802.3df D1.1 2nd Task Force review comments Response # 1Cl 124 SC 124.8.5 P 107 L1 Comment Type TR The text in the last bullet under 124.8.5 "The 400GBASE-DR4-2 or 800GBASE-DR8-2 transmitter is
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cg/comments/RemainingComments_EOD_23May_802d3cg_d3p0_Clause.pdf
IEEE P802.3cg D3.0 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 10 Mb/s Operation and Associated Power Delivery over a Single Balanced Pair of Conductors Initial Sponsor ballot comments
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/dc/comments/P8023_D3p0_comments_received_by_id.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3 (IEEE 802.3dc) D3.0 Maintenance #16 (Revision) Initial Sponsor ballot comments Proposed Response # I-1Cl 69 SC 69.1.1 P 3018 L13 Comment Type T It is not necessary to specify the
PHY layer proposal for BWA
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/16/tg1/phy/contrib/802161pc-00_14.pdf
PHY layer proposal for BWA 2000-02-25 IEEE 802.16.1pc-00/14 Project IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group Title PHY layer proposal for BWA Date Submitted 2000-02-25 Source Jay Klein Ense
Joint meeting of the IEEE P802.3cw, P802.3df, P802.3dj Task Forces meeting minutes - unapproved
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/dj/public/23_05/minutes_3cwdfdj_2305_a_unapproved.pdf
Joint meeting of the IEEE P802.3cw, P802.3df, P802.3dj Task Forces meeting minutes - unapproved Joint Meeting of the IEEE P802.3cw DWDM Systems Task Force, IEEE P802.3df 400 Gb/s and 800 Gb/s Ethernet
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bz/comments/8023bzD1p0_Clause_FINAL.pdf
IEEE P802.3bz D1.0 2.5/5GBASE-T 1st Task Force review comments # 211Cl 00 SC 0 P 1 L 28 Comment Type E Both "twisted-pair" and "twisted pair" appear to be used interchangeably throughout the document.
IEEE P802.3ap/D2.3 Backplane Ethernet Comments: Proposed Responses Sorted by Clause, Page, Line
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/ap/public/mar06/d2p3comments_proposed_bycls.pdf
IEEE P802.3ap/D2.3 Backplane Ethernet Comments: Proposed Responses Sorted by Clause, Page, Line IEEE P802.3ap/D2.3 Backplane Ethernet CommentsProposed Responses # 18Cl 00 SC P 11 L 7 Comment Type E Pa
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/by/public/comments/8023by_D10_comments_received_by_ID.pdf
IEEE 802.3by D1.0 25 Gb/s Ethernet 2nd Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 045 SC 45.2.1.102.1 P 43 L 16 Comment Type E "alignment markers lock" should be "alignment marker lock" Sugges
Physical Layer Proposal for the 802.16.1 Air Interface Specification
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/16/tg1/phy/contrib/802161pc-00_27.pdf
Physical Layer Proposal for the 802.16.1 Air Interface Specification 2000-04-27 IEEE 802.16.1pc-00/27 1-1 Project IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group Title Phys
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bz/comments/8023bzD1p0_CommentID_FINAL.pdf
IEEE P802.3bz D1.0 2.5/5GBASE-T 1st Task Force review comments # 120Cl 126 SC 126.7.4 P 169 L 8 Comment Type E This subclause lacks a clear and logical narrative. Suggest to reorganize the existing in
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/Documents/DocumentArchives/1993_docs/1193001_scan.pdf
January 1993 IEEE P802.11-93/1 Application of Mathematica Based Simulation Template to Demand Assigned MAC Described in IEEE P802.11-92/39 (liThe IBM MAC Proposal") Submitted By: Larry Van Der Jagt Kn
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bz/comments/8023bzD1p0_Topic_FINAL.pdf
IEEE P802.3bz D1.0 2.5/5GBASE-T 1st Task Force review comments 237Cl 126 SC 126.1.1 P 69 L 35 Comment Type T Late comment on behalf of Brett McClellan, Marvell There is no PMD in clause 126. Reference
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cw/comments/D3p0/8023cw_D3p0_comments_received_by_clause.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D3.0 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems Initial Sponsor ballot comments # I-145Cl FM SC FM P1 L29 Comment Type T This PHY does not operate over DWDM systems as Pete Anslow defined them
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/df/comments/D1p1/8023df_D1p1_comments_proposed_clause_2.pdf
IEEE P802.3df D1.1 2nd Task Force review comments # 47Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 31 Comment Type E "adds MAC parameters, Physical Layers, and management parameters" but we talk about "the Physical Layer" like
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/ch/comments/P8023ch_D2p1_comments_by_page_line_no_responses.pdf
MainTable D2.1 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 2.5 Gb/s, 5 Gb/s, and 10 Gb/s Autom P802.3ch D2.1 124Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type T the changes to allow the user to set preco
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cw/comments/D3p0/8023cw_D3p0_comments_received_by_ID.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D3.0 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems Initial Sponsor ballot comments Proposed Response # I-1Cl 1 SC 1.3 P21 L8 Comment Type TR Please reconcile if ITU-T G709.1 or ITU-T G709 is the
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bq/comments/p802.3bq_d2.1_final_Topic.pdf
IEEE P802.3bq D2.1 Physical Layer and Management Parameters for 40Gb/s Operation, Type 40GBASE-T 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments 103Cl 55 SC 55.3.5.3 P 54 L 45 Comment Type ER Strikeou
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bt/comments/802d3bt_D2p1_TFTDs_DraftOrder.pdf
IEEE P802.3bt D2.1 4-Pair PoE 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments 162Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type TR TDL D2.0 #513 - System Unbalance Requirements SuggestedRemedy See paul_01_1116.pdf WFP T
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/ch/comments/P8023ch_D2p1_comments_by_Comment_ID_no_responses.pdf
MainTable D2.1 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 2.5 Gb/s, 5 Gb/s, and 10 Gb/s Autom P802.3ch D2.1 Proposed Response # 1Cl 45 SC 45.2.1 P 32 L 31 Comment Type T The definitio
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/df/comments/D1p1/8023df_D1p1_comments_proposed_id.pdf
IEEE P802.3df D1.1 2nd Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 124 SC 124.8.5 P 107 L 1 Comment Type TR The text in the last bullet under 124.8.5 "The 400GBASE-DR4-2 or 800GBASE-DR8-2 trans
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cb/comments/IEEE_P802d3cb_D3p0_Cmt_Resolution_by_ID_20170818_1701.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cb D3.0 2.5 Gb/s and 5 Gb/s Operation over Backplane Initial Sponsor ballot comments Response # i-1Cl 127 SC 127.2.6.2.1 P 85 L 8 Comment Type TR *** Comment submitted with the fi