Extending Power via MDI for IEEE 802.3bt Baseline Extending Power via MDI for IEEE 802.3BT, BASELINE Fred Schindler, Seen Simply IEEE 802.3bt Task Force, March 2015, Berlin Supporters: Kousalya Balasu
Re: [STDS-802-11] IETF individual draft of interest- 11ah and 6lo Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: [STDS-802-11] IETF individual draft of
VOTE on Motions 5, 6, and 7 Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index VOTE on Motions 5, 6, and 7 To : " STDS-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " < STDS-1788@xxx
Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBH] Updated Issues Tracking Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBH] Updated Issues Tracking To : STDS-802-
[802SEC] Agenda items for EC web mtg RE 802.22 Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index [802SEC] Agenda items for EC web mtg RE 802.22 To : STDS-802-
[STDS-802-11-CAC] Fwd: RFC 7241 on The IEEE 802/IETF Relationship Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index [STDS-802-11-CAC] Fwd: RFC 7241 on The IEE
RE: [802.21] transport layer for MIH IS. Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index RE: [802.21] transport layer for MIH IS. To : STDS-802-21@LISTSERV.
MainTable IEEE P802.3cp D2.0 Bidirectional 10 Gb/s, 25 Gb/s, and 50 Gb/s Optical Access PHYs Initial Working Group ballot comments # 147Cl FM SC FM P1 L10 Comment Type ER State this is amendment 11 an
MainTable IEEE P802.3 (IEEE 802.3cj) D2.0 Maintenance #12 (Revision) Initial Working Group ballot comments # 23Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type E http://www.ieee802.org/3/WG_tools/editorial/requirements/wo
IEEE 802.3by D2.0 25 Gb/s Ethernet Initial Working Group ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 030 SC 30.5.1.1.4 P 30 L 1 Comment Type E If the MAU is a 10M b/s... This should be 10 Mb/s for consist
IEEE P802.3bz D2.0 2.5G/5GBASE-T Initial Working Group ballot comments Proposed Response # 201Cl 126 SC 126.3.2.2.8 P 88 L 41 Comment Type T this section defines invalid blocks that may be seen at the
MainTable IEEE P802.3 (IEEE 802.3cj) D2.0 Maintenance #12 (Revision) Initial Working Group ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 30 SC 30.5.1.1.25 P 444 L 48 Comment Type E In the text added by P802
IEEE P802.3bz D2.0 2.5G/5GBASE-T Initial Working Group ballot comments # 292Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type E copyright_year variable should be 2016 in all clause files SuggestedRemedy change copyright_ye
IEEE P802.3bz D2.0 2.5G/5GBASE-T Initial Working Group ballot comments 313Cl 30 SC 30 P 27 L 1 Comment Type ER General comment on Clause 30 - most (if not all) objects modified by this project are als
IEEE 802.16.1 Comment Resolutions at Session #11 Comments by Page # / Line# Page/Line: 5 Number 1 Name: Wang Change: Change "Sub-layer" to "Sublayer" and similar incidences throughout the document (e.
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.1 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 00 SC 0 P 12 L 47 Comment Type E If you look at the 802.3cy project, it
IEEE 802.3by D2.0 25 Gb/s Ethernet Initial Working Group ballot comments # 190Cl 000 SC 0 P L Comment Type TR The current draft contains two different variants of 25 Gb/s Ethernet where idle insertion
IEEE P802.3bt D2.0 4-Pair PoE Initial Working Group ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 33 SC 33.5.1.2 P 175 L 51 Comment Type TR The editor's note refers to TABLE 33-22. This appears to be the wr
IEEE P802.3bt D2.0 4-Pair PoE Initial Working Group ballot comments 172Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type ER There are a large number of broken cross references in the draft. These should either be made into
802.16.1 Comments Resolved at Session #9 2000-09-27 IEEE 802.16.1-00/09 0 Project IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group Title 802.16.1 Comments Resolved at Sessio
MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.2 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 3rd Task Force review comments # 84Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type E Normal wake mode is not the best name for the "non-FW" mode. Should co
IEEE P802.3bt D2.4 4-Pair PoE 4th Working Group recirculation ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 145 SC 145.3.3.7 P 179 L 40 Comment Type TR The NO_POWER state allows unwanted behavior by the PD.