IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, 200 Gb/s Ethernet 3rd Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 136 SC 136.9.4.2 P 216 L 1 Comment Type T Separate interference tolerance (noise stress) and j
IEEE P802.3df D1.0 1st Task Force review comments Response # 1Cl 45 SC 45.2.4 P 47 L 4 Comment Type T "45.2.4 PHY XS registers" and "45.2.5 DTE XS registers" subsections need to be brought into the 80
IEEE P802.3df D1.0 1st Task Force review comments # 110Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 10 Comment Type E "Amendment:" - there should be an amendment number here. According to pages 13 and 14, this would be number 1
802.3ae IEEE P802.3at D3.0 PoEplus comments Response # 23Cl 33 SC 33.2.8.1 P 45 L 46 Comment Type E Substitue variable name for number SuggestedRemedy Change 51mA to Iclass_lim Min ACCEPT. Comment Sta
MainTable IEEE P802.3cp D2.0 Bidirectional 10 Gb/s, 25 Gb/s, and 50 Gb/s Optical Access PHYs Initial Working Group ballot comments # 147Cl FM SC FM P1 L10 Comment Type ER State this is amendment 11 an
IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, 200 Gb/s Ethernet 3rd Task Force review comments # 10Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 31 Comment Type E IEEE Std 802.3bu-2016 and IEEE Std 802.3bv-201x are missing from the list of a
MainTable EE 802.3db D2.0 100G, 200G, 400G Short Reach Fiber Task Force Initial Working Group ballot comment Proposed Response # 1Cl 167 SC Table 167-7 P 51 L27 Comment Type E The TDECQ is the same fo
Comments received on Draft 2.1 and comments carried over from Draft 2.0 IEEE P802.3aq Draft 2.1 Comments # 1001Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type TR See John George's Comment #6 in recirculation package. Sugge
IEEE P802.3ck D2.0 100/200/400 Gb/s Electrical Interfaces Task Force Initial Working Group ballot comments # 229Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 10 Comment Type E From the amendment list starting at line 28, it appe
IEEE P802.3df D1.0 1st Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 45 SC 45.2.4 P 47 L 4 Comment Type T "45.2.4 PHY XS registers" and "45.2.5 DTE XS registers" subsections need to be brought in
IEEE P802.3df D1.0 1st Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 45 SC 45.2.4 P 47 L 4 Comment Type T "45.2.4 PHY XS registers" and "45.2.5 DTE XS registers" subsections need to be brought in
IEEE P802.3df D1.0 1st Task Force review comments # 110Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 10 Comment Type E "Amendment:" - there should be an amendment number here. According to pages 13 and 14, this would be number 1
IEEE P802.3df D1.0 1st Task Force review comments # 110Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 10 Comment Type E "Amendment:" - there should be an amendment number here. According to pages 13 and 14, this would be number 1
MainTable IEEE P802.3cp D2.0 Bidirectional 10 Gb/s, 25 Gb/s, and 50 Gb/s Optical Access PHYs Initial Working Group ballot comments # 147Cl FM SC FM P1 L10 Comment Type ER State this is amendment 11 an
IEEE P802.3ck D2.0 100/200/400 Gb/s Electrical Interfaces Task Force Initial Working Group ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 45 SC 45.2.1.115a P 46 L 13 Comment Type E When a new subclause is in
MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D3.0 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable Initial Sponsor ballot comments # i-6Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type G General comment SuggestedRemedy There appears to be editorial opport
MainTable IEEE P802.3ba D3.0 40Gb/s and 100Gb/s Ethernet comments Draft 3.0 Comments Sponsor ballot # 611Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type ER Global - Plots of insertion loss, return loss, crosstalk limits
Comment ID Date Comment . Name Email Phone Style Index . Classification Vote Category Page Subclause Line Comment File Must Be Satisfied Proposed Change Resolution Status Resolution Detail Other1 Othe
IEEE P802.3df D1.1 2nd Task Force review comments # 47Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 31 Comment Type E "adds MAC parameters, Physical Layers, and management parameters" but we talk about "the Physical Layer" like
IEEE 802.17 Terms and Definitions Proposed Comment Resolutions Sorted by Comment ID # 1Cl 01 SC 01.39 P 3 L Comment Type E I think it is confusing SuggestedRemedy It should read ..at the destination s
MainTable IEEE P802.3 (IEEE 802.3dc) D3.0 Maintenance #16 (Revision) Initial Sponsor ballot comments # I-43Cl FM SC FM P 1 L26 Comment Type E Don't forget to update copyright year here and next page,
IEEE 802.3by D2.1 25 Gb/s Ethernet 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments # 88Cl FM SC FM P 11 L 17 Comment Type E One would reasonably assume that "the existing base standard and its amendme