IEEE P802.3 D2p0 proposed comments IEEE P802.3df D2.0 Initial Working Group ballot comments # 50Cl FM SC FM P 1 L29 Comment Type E Both cx and cz were approved during the March SASB meeting and should
IEEE P802.3cg D2.0 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 10 Mb/s Operation and Associated Power Delivery over a Single Balanced Pair of Conductors Initial Working Group ballot co
IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, 200 Gb/s Ethernet 3rd Sponsor recirculation ballot comments # r03-2Cl FM SC FM P 8 L 23 Comment Type E The names of the participants in the WG ballot stage should be a
MainTable IEEE P802.3az Energy Efficient Ethernet commentsProposed responses: D2.3 March 2010 # 79Cl 36 SC 36.2.5.2.2 P 83 L 6 Comment Type TR The receive state machine is not controling the state of
RE: [802.3ae] Bad idea...not including FP laser in PMD Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index RE: [802.3ae] Bad idea...not including FP laser in PM
TG3 Channel Model – Protested Status and Voting 2001-07-02 IEEE 802.16.3c-01/70 0 Project IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group Title TG3 Channel Model – Proteste
RE: [802.3ae] Bad idea...not including FP laser in PMD Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index RE: [802.3ae] Bad idea...not including FP laser in PM
802.3ae IEEE P802.3ba D2.1 40Gb/s and 100Gb/s Ethernet comments Draft 2.1 Comments Working Group ballot # 297Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type ER The term 'nAUI" should be used rather than XLAUI / CAUI when t
802.3ae IEEE P802.3ba D2.1 40Gb/s and 100Gb/s Ethernet comments Draft 2.1 Comments Working Group ballot Response # 1Cl 73 SC 73.9.1 P 101 L 32 Comment Type TR This is a pile on to unsatisfied comment
MainTable IEEE P802.3 (IEEE 802.3bh) Ethernet Initial Sponsor ballot comments Response # i-1Cl 30 SC 30.3.3.2 P 399 L 10 Comment Type T Attribute aMACControlFunctionsSupported does not contain any ref
IEEE 802.3 comment tool IEEE P802.3bp D1.4 1000BASE-T1 PHY 5th Task Force review commentsReceived Comments # 504Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type E Is there supposed to be a period after heach item in a Des
MainTable IEEE P802.3 (IEEE 802.3bh) Ethernet Initial Sponsor ballot comments # i-59Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type E Within Sections 2 and 3, most of the internal cross-references to Tables and Figures a
IEEE P802.3ck D3.0 100/200/400 Gb/s Electrical Interfaces Task Force Initial Sponsor ballot comments # I-157Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 10 Comment Type E Missing amendment number SuggestedRemedy Insert amendmen
IEEE 802 EC July 2016 Plenary Opening Meeting 1 | P a g e MINUTES (Unconfirmed) IEEE 802 LMSC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING, Revision 0 Prepared by John D’Ambrosia, Recording Secretary Monday, Jul 25, 2
IEEE 802.3by D3.0 25 Gb/s Ethernet Initial Sponsor ballot comments # i-90Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 1 Comment Type E As it seems likely that IEEE P802.3by will be the second amendment to IEEE Std 802.3- 2015 p
IEEE P802.3cx D3.0 ITSA Task Force Initial Sponsor ballot commentsApproved Responses # I-69Cl 30 SC 30.2.5 P 24 L 30 Comment Type E Table 30-6 is in subclause 30.2.5, which is not listed in this draft
MainTable IEEE P802.3ct D2.0 100 Gb/s over DWDM systems Initial Working Group ballot comments # 20Cl FM SC FM P1 L27 Comment Type E 802.3ch and 802.3ca have been approved as standards. SuggestedRemedy
MINUTES (Unconfirmed) IEEE 802 LMSC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING, Revision 1 Friday, March 16, 2011 – 1:00 p.m. All times HawaiiAleutian Standard Time (HAST) Waikoloa, HI EC members present: Paul N