TI Physical Layer Proposal for IEEE 802.15 Task Group 3a March, 1994 DOC: IEEE P802.11-94/xxx May, 2003 IEEE P802.15-03/142r1 DOCPROPERTY "Category" \* MERGEFORMAT IEEE P802.15 Wireless Personal Area
IEEE P802.3ae/D3.3 Comment Resolutions P802.3ae Draft 3.3 Comments # 105Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E BERT is bit error RATIO (most times) - see definitions 1.5 or manufacturer's literature. SuggestedRe
January 1992 Doc: IEEE P802.11/92-20 IEEE 802.11 Wireless Access Method and Physical Layer Specifications Wireles~ Local Area Network Requirements IEEE Project 802.11 K. Biba (ad.) Abstract An effecti
IEEE P802.3aq 10GBASE-LRM Task Force IEEE P802.3aq Comments 01/ # 1Cl 00 SC P 1 L 1 Comment Type TR The bulk of the work in 802.3aq to this point has centered on simulations; the technical feasibility
IEEE 802.3db D2.0 100G, 200G, 400G Short Reach Fiber Task Force Initial Working Group ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 167 SC Table 167-7 P51 L27 Comment Type E The TDECQ is the same for both v
IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, 200 Gb/s Ethernet Initial Working Group ballot comments # 30Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 31 Comment Type E The Working Group Chair has now announced the assumed approval order fo
End to End Channel Pairto pair resistance unbalance IEEE802.3 4P Task Force Channel Pair To Pair Resistance Imbalance (End to End System Imbalance) Ad Hoc July 2014 Yair Darshan Microsemi ydarshan@mic
IEEE 802.3db D2.0 100G, 200G, 400G Short Reach Fiber Task Force Initial Working Group ballot comments # 216Cl FM SC FM P1 L10 Comment Type E The introduction identifies the amendment as #4. SuggestedR
IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, 200 Gb/s Ethernet Initial Working Group ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 132 SC 132.1 P 129 L 23 Comment Type E "64-bit wide" or "64-bit-wide"? Given that these
IEEE P802.3bt D2.1 4P-PoE 2nd Task Force review comments 162Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type TR TDL D2.0 #513 - System Unbalance Requirements SuggestedRemedy See paul_01_1116.pdf ACCEPT IN PRINCIPLE. Add T
IEEE 802.3bn EPON Protocol over Coax (EPoC) TF 2nd Task Force review commentsDraft 1.1 Approved Resolution # 2850Cl 00 SC 0 P 1 L 1 Comment Type ER Update Copyright date to 2015 SuggestedRemedy per co
IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, 200 Gb/s Ethernet Initial Sponsor ballot comments # i-2Cl 000 SC 000 P L Comment Type ER Update the editing instructions throughout the document to reference the new r
IEEE P802.3bt D2.1 4-Pair PoE 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments 162Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type TR TDL D2.0 #513 - System Unbalance Requirements SuggestedRemedy See paul_01_1116.pdf WFP T
IEEE P802.3bt D2.1 4P-PoE 2nd Task Force review comments Response # 1Cl FM SC FM P 19 L 13 Comment Type ER "devices or networks. implement-" SuggestedRemedy Capitalize the start of a sentence. "device
IEEE P802.3bt D2.1 4-Pair PoE 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl FM SC FM P 19 L 13 Comment Type ER "devices or networks. implement-" SuggestedRemedy Capitalize th
MainTable IEEE P802.3cg D3.0 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 10 Mb/s Operation and Associated Power Delivery over a Single Balanced Pair of Conductors Initial Sponsor ballo
MainTable IEEE P802.3cg D3.0 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 10 Mb/s Operation and Associated Power Delivery over a Single Balanced Pair of Conductors Initial Sponsor ballo
MainTable IEEE P802.3cg D3.0 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 10 Mb/s Operation and Associated Power Delivery over a Single Balanced Pair of Conductors Initial Sponsor ballo
IEEE P802.3bt D3.0 4-Pair PoE Initial Sponsor ballot comments i-349Cl 33 SC 33.5.1 P 0 L 0 Comment Type ER Cl. 33.5.1, para 1 would seem to be a requirement that applies to cl. 145 devices but I find
Re: [802.3_SPEP2P] EXTERNAL: Re: [802.3_SPEP2P] compatibility between 10 Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: [802.3_SPEP2P] EXTERNAL: Re: [8
Freelance Graphics - abler_01_0305.PRZ Presentation to IEEE P802.3ap Backplane Ethernet Task Force March 2005 Working Session Title: NRZ/DFE Simulation Results over Ad-hoc Channels Source: Joe Abler a
RE: WWDM vs. 10Gb/s serial Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index RE: WWDM vs. 10Gb/s serial To : ,
Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-PHY-Beamforming Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-PHY-Beamforming To : STDS-802-11-TGBE@