118132 results found. results are sorted by relevance
  101-125
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bz/comments/8023bzD1p0_CommentID_FINAL.pdf
IEEE P802.3bz D1.0 2.5/5GBASE-T 1st Task Force review comments # 120Cl 126 SC 126.7.4 P 169 L 8 Comment Type E This subclause lacks a clear and logical narrative. Suggest to reorganize the existing in
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/Documents/DocumentArchives/1993_docs/1193001_scan.pdf
January 1993 IEEE P802.11-93/1 Application of Mathematica Based Simulation Template to Demand Assigned MAC Described in IEEE P802.11-92/39 (liThe IBM MAC Proposal") Submitted By: Larry Van Der Jagt Kn
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bz/comments/8023bzD1p0_Topic_FINAL.pdf
IEEE P802.3bz D1.0 2.5/5GBASE-T 1st Task Force review comments 237Cl 126 SC 126.1.1 P 69 L 35 Comment Type T Late comment on behalf of Brett McClellan, Marvell There is no PMD in clause 126. Reference
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cw/comments/D3p0/8023cw_D3p0_comments_received_by_clause.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D3.0 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems Initial Sponsor ballot comments # I-145Cl FM SC FM P1 L29 Comment Type T This PHY does not operate over DWDM systems as Pete Anslow defined them
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/df/comments/D1p1/8023df_D1p1_comments_proposed_clause_2.pdf
IEEE P802.3df D1.1 2nd Task Force review comments # 47Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 31 Comment Type E "adds MAC parameters, Physical Layers, and management parameters" but we talk about "the Physical Layer" like
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/ch/comments/P8023ch_D2p1_comments_by_page_line_no_responses.pdf
MainTable D2.1 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 2.5 Gb/s, 5 Gb/s, and 10 Gb/s Autom P802.3ch D2.1 124Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type T the changes to allow the user to set preco
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cw/comments/D3p0/8023cw_D3p0_comments_received_by_ID.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D3.0 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems Initial Sponsor ballot comments Proposed Response # I-1Cl 1 SC 1.3 P21 L8 Comment Type TR Please reconcile if ITU-T G709.1 or ITU-T G709 is the
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bq/comments/p802.3bq_d2.1_final_Topic.pdf
IEEE P802.3bq D2.1 Physical Layer and Management Parameters for 40Gb/s Operation, Type 40GBASE-T 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments 103Cl 55 SC 55.3.5.3 P 54 L 45 Comment Type ER Strikeou
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bt/comments/802d3bt_D2p1_TFTDs_DraftOrder.pdf
IEEE P802.3bt D2.1 4-Pair PoE 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments 162Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type TR TDL D2.0 #513 - System Unbalance Requirements SuggestedRemedy See paul_01_1116.pdf WFP T
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/ch/comments/P8023ch_D2p1_comments_by_Comment_ID_no_responses.pdf
MainTable D2.1 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 2.5 Gb/s, 5 Gb/s, and 10 Gb/s Autom P802.3ch D2.1 Proposed Response # 1Cl 45 SC 45.2.1 P 32 L 31 Comment Type T The definitio
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/df/comments/D1p1/8023df_D1p1_comments_proposed_id.pdf
IEEE P802.3df D1.1 2nd Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 124 SC 124.8.5 P 107 L 1 Comment Type TR The text in the last bullet under 124.8.5 "The 400GBASE-DR4-2 or 800GBASE-DR8-2 trans
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cb/comments/IEEE_P802d3cb_D3p0_Cmt_Resolution_by_ID_20170818_1701.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cb D3.0 2.5 Gb/s and 5 Gb/s Operation over Backplane Initial Sponsor ballot comments Response # i-1Cl 127 SC 127.2.6.2.1 P 85 L 8 Comment Type TR *** Comment submitted with the fi
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/by/public/comments/8023by_D21_comment_proposed_responses_by_ID_final.pdf
IEEE 802.3by D2.1 25 Gb/s Ethernet 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 108 SC 108.5.2.4 P 106 L 15 Comment Type T CL 108.5.2.4 In 802.3bj, CL 91.5.3.7 (AM mapping a
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cy/comments/802d3cy_D3_0_approved_WIP_1.pdf
IEEE P802.3cy D3.0 10G+ Auto Task Force Initial Sponsor ballot commentsProposed Responses I-1Cl 0 SC 0 P 1 L 0 Comment Type G It seems unlikely that .3cw (Amendment #8) is approved before .3cy (Amendm
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/21/doctree/Sponsor_Ballot/21-07-0360-04-0000_SB_Comments_Spreadsheet.csv
Comment ID Date Comment . Name Email Phone Style Index . Classification Vote Category Page Subclause Line Comment File Must Be Satisfied Proposed Change Resolution Status Resolution Detail Other1 Othe
IEEE 802.21
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/21/doctree/2005_Meeting_Docs/2005-05_meeting_docs/21-05-0240-01-0000-Joint_Harmonized_MIH_Proposal_Draft_Text.doc
IEEE 802.21 Project IEEE 802.21 Media Independent Handover Services < http://www.ieee802.org/21/ > Title MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER Date Submitted May, 2005 Source(s) Joint Harmonized Contribution Re:
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/at/comments/D0.9/P802d3at_D0p9_postmtg2_by_clause.pdf
MainTable comments # 280Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E SuggestedRemedy Comment Status X Response Status C NoName Proposed Response # 205Cl 00 SC P 2 L 1 Comment Type E Add note to balloters to indicate t
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/efm/public/comments/d1_7/D1_732_comments_final.pdf
MainTable P802.3ah Draft 1.732 Comments # 56001Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E To accept the editorial recommendations from the IEEE Staff Editor on Clauses 00, 01, 56 & 66 SuggestedRemedy Proposed Respon
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/Minutes/Cons_Minutes_Mar-2005.pdf
March, 2005 doc.: IEEE 802.11-05/0286r0 IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs Approved Minutes of the IEEE P802.11 Full Working Group Date: 2005-03-14 Author(s): Name Company Address Phone email Tim Godfrey Cone
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bt/comments/IEEE802d3bt_D2p0_Received_DraftOrder.pdf
IEEE P802.3bt D2.0 4-Pair PoE Initial Working Group ballot comments 172Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type ER There are a large number of broken cross references in the draft. These should either be made into
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bt/comments/IEEE802d3bt_D2p0_Received_CommentID.pdf
IEEE P802.3bt D2.0 4-Pair PoE Initial Working Group ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 33 SC 5.1.2 P 175 L 51 Comment Type TR The editor's note refers to TABLE 33-22. This appears to be the wrong
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/efm/public/jun03/D1_732_comments_final.pdf
MainTable P802.3ah Draft 1.732 Comments # 56001Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E To accept the editorial recommendations from the IEEE Staff Editor on Clauses 00, 01, 56 & 66 SuggestedRemedy Proposed Respon
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bj/comments/P8023bj-D1p0-Comments_Final_byID.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.0 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 1st Task Force review comments Response # 1Cl 93 SC 93.8.1 Table 93-4 P 131 L 11 Comment Type T Common mode DC output voltage is specif
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bj/comments/P8023bj-D1p0-Comments_Final_byCls.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D1.0 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable 1st Task Force review comments # 286Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type ER For channel parameters, "differential insertion loss" and "insertion
Comments on Draft 2.1 as of 8th August 2005
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/aq/public/comments/d2.1/P802.3aqD2.1com8Aug05.pdf
Comments on Draft 2.1 as of 8th August 2005 IEEE P802.3aq Draft 2.1 Comments # 1001Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type TR See John George's Comment #6 in recirculation package. SuggestedRemedy Per suggested rem