bs_prop_01 A Portland Proposal1 This proposal is an attempt to address diverse interests in the 802.17 working group. It is unlikely that anyone will find it acceptable in its entirety, but it would b
agenda_1116 Page 1IEEE P802.3bt 4-Pair Power over Ethernet (4PPoE) – November 2016 Plenary Meeting Agenda and General Information IEEE P802.3bt 4-Pair Power over Ethernet (4PPoE) Chad Jones Cisco Syst
Re: [HSSG] Regarding presentation "Implementation Considerations" by Rog Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: [HSSG] Regarding presentation "
FW: [802SEC] +++ SEC EMAIL BALLOT +++ MOTION: Authorize conditional forw Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index FW: [802SEC] +++ SEC EMAIL BALLOT +
Agenda and General Information, 23 March 2020 Teleconference IEEE 802.3 New Ethernet Applications Ad hoc Teleconference Meeting 29 Oct 2020 IEEE 802.3 NEA Ad hoc Teleconference Meeting, 29 Oct 2020 •
[802SEC] LAST CHANCE: for Early Registration for the July 15-20, 2012 I Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index [802SEC] LAST CHANCE: for Early Regi
Re: WISardry Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: WISardry To : < rtaborek@xxxxxxxxxxx >, "HSSG" < stds-802-3-hssg@xxxxxxxx > Subject : Re: W
IEEE 802 SEC Email Archive IEEE 802 SEC Email Archive Date Index (Page 104 of 577) Thread Index Search Tool First Page Prev Page Next Page Last Page Re: [802SEC] +++ Early Close 10-day EC Motion+++ #1
Re: [802.3_B10K] 802.3cn Interim Teleconference ER8, ER4, ER1 Specificat Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: [802.3_B10K] 802.3cn Interim Te
Re: [802.3_NGEPON] Call for agenda - 802.3ca (100G-EPON) consensus build Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: [802.3_NGEPON] Call for agenda
Re: [8023-POEP] IEEE 802.3at Vport ad hoc meetings Tuesday June 26; mate Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: [8023-POEP] IEEE 802.3at Vport
RE: stds-802-mobility: Planning For the January Interim Meeting Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index RE: stds-802-mobility: Planning For the Janu
RE: [EFM] Active Architectures Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index RE: [EFM] Active Architectures To : FEffenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx , hbarrass
Re: [802.3_B400G] [802.3_B400G_LOGIC] P802.3dj Joint Logic/Optics Track Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: [802.3_B400G] [802.3_B400G_LOGIC
Re: REMINDER: MANDATORY RAC COORDINATION: P1711.2™/D3 Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: REMINDER: MANDATORY RAC COORDINATION: P1711.2™/D3
The case for TDM coexistence 1 01/10/2017 | IEEE 802.3ca Task Force | The Case for TDM Coexistence in O-Band John Johnson IEEE 802.3 Interim, Huntington Beach January 10, 2017 2 01/10/2017 | IEEE 802.
Fwd: REMINDER: MANDATORY RAC COORDINATION: P1901.1™/D0.8 Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Fwd: REMINDER: MANDATORY RAC COORDINATION: P1901.1™
Re: Customer request for 2949 addresses per device. Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: Customer request for 2949 addresses per device. To :
RE: [EFM] OAM - Faye's seven points Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index RE: [EFM] OAM - Faye's seven points To : Roy Bynum < rabynum@xxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Working Group Question re: Subtyping Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: Working Group Question re: Subtyping To : Geoff Thompson < thom
[802.3ae] RE: Clause 45: MDIO Electrical Specifications Ed, I’m afraid some of my remarks on the MDIO electrical specifications weren't as explicit as they should have been. Since positive currents ar
RE: [EFM-Copper] RE: [EFM] (forward) progress in EFM copper Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index RE: [EFM-Copper] RE: [EFM] (forward) progress in
Re: [EFM] EFM Requirements Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: [EFM] EFM Requirements To : Vladimir Oksman < oksman@broadcom.com >, "Stds-80
Re: YANG for EtherTypes Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: YANG for EtherTypes To : Pat Thaler < pat.thaler@xxxxxxxxxxxx >, Robert Grow < b