IEEE P802.3bz D1.1 2.5G/5GBASE-T 2nd Task Force review comments 34Cl 28 SC 28.3.2 P 27 L 26 Comment Type E Delete 40Gb/s strikeout text - align w/bq SuggestedRemedy see comment - relates to master com
IEEE P802.3df D1.1 2nd Task Force review comments # 47Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 31 Comment Type E "adds MAC parameters, Physical Layers, and management parameters" but we talk about "the Physical Layer" like
MainTable IEEE P802.3cg D3.0 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 10 Mb/s Operation and Associated Power Delivery over a Single Balanced Pair of Conductors Initial Sponsor ballo
MainTable IEEE 802.3av d2.2 10G-EPON comments IEEE 802.3av Draft 2.2 Final Responses # 2868Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type E Confusing for abreviation: RS=Reconciliation Sublayer vs. RS=Reed-Solomon Sugge
IEEE P802.3bt D3.3 4-Pair Power over Ethernet 3rd Sponsor recirculation ballot comments Proposed Response # r03-1Cl 0 SC 0 P L Comment Type E The base_year variable appears to be set correctly as 201x
IEEE P802.3bz D1.1 2.5G/5GBASE-T 2nd Task Force review comments # 100Cl 00 SC 0 P 1 L 1 Comment Type E Please provide the option of using the new comment spreadsheet at the URL
IEEE 802.3by D2.1 25 Gb/s Ethernet 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 108 SC 5.2.4 P 106 L 15 Comment Type T CL 108.5.2.4 In 802.3bj, CL 91.5.3.7 (AM mapping and i
IEEE P802.3bt D3.3 4-Pair Power over Ethernet 3rd Sponsor recirculation ballot comments r03-1Cl 0 SC 0 P L Comment Type E The base_year variable appears to be set correctly as 201x in the front matter
IEEE P802.3df D1.1 2nd Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 124 SC 124.8.5 P 107 L 1 Comment Type TR The text in the last bullet under 124.8.5 "The 400GBASE-DR4-2 or 800GBASE-DR8-2 trans
IEEE 802.3by D2.1 25 Gb/s Ethernet 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments # 88Cl FM SC FM P 11 L 17 Comment Type E One would reasonably assume that "the existing base standard and its amendme
IEEE P802.3bz D1.1 2.5G/5GBASE-T 2nd Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 126 SC 126.7.2 P 167 L 25 Comment Type T There are factors of 4 in equations 126-10, 126-11, 126-21, 126-22, 126
MainTable IEEE P802.3cb 2.5 Gb/s and 5 Gb/s Backplane Initial Working Group ballot comments D2p0 # 120Cl FM SC P 1 L 18 Comment Type E Extraneous "." at the end of the amendment title SuggestedRemedy
MainTable IEEE P802.3aq Comments 18/ # 4Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E Readability and comprehension are challenged by the tight formatting. Currently, the reader is required to scan and jump several pag
MainTable IEEE P802.3cb 2.5 Gb/s and 5 Gb/s Backplane Initial Working Group ballot comments D2p0 Proposed Response # 1Cl 128 SC 7.1.6 P 109 L 41 Comment Type ER The cluase deals with common mode outpu
January 1992 Doc: IEEE P802.1l/92-xx IEEE 802.11 Wireless Access Method and Physical Layer Specifications Wireless Local Area Network Requirements IEEE Project 802.11 K. Biba (ed.) Abstract An effecti
MainTable comments # 280Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E SuggestedRemedy Comment Status X Response Status O NoName Proposed Response # 169Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type TR The objectives state that we will su
MainTable IEEE P802.3at D3.0 PoEplus comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 33E SC 33E P 151 L 10 Comment Type E Include a reference to channel DC resistance unbalance specifications defined by TIA. Suggest
P802.16.1a Draft AWD IEEE 802.16n-11/0025 Project IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group Title P802.16.1a Draft AWD Date Submitted 10/13/11 Source(s) Tim Godfrey,
MainTable IEEE P802.3at D3.0 PoEplus comments # 467Cl 00 SC 00 P L Comment Type ER The current ballot claims that it is referenced against P802.3ay Draft 2.1. As of the date of the close of this ballo
MainTable IEEE P802.3az D1.0 Energy Efficient Ethernet comments IEEE P802.3az D1.0 Nov 2008 # 243Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type E at the risk of getting the 8-ball, I think we should be consistent about