MainTable IEEE P802.3ba D1.2 40Gb/s and 100Gb/s Ethernet comments Draft 1.2 Comments Task force Review # 114Cl 45 SC 45.2.1.12b P 51 L 48 Comment Type T Draft says "Register 1.19, bit 14 indicates tha
MainTable IEEE P802.3az D2.2 Energy Efficient Ethernet commentsProposed responses Jan 2010 # 72Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type ER It has been agreed with staff that where a subclause is inserted prior to
IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, 200 Gb/s Ethernet 1st Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 091 SC 91.6.2a P 86 L 11 Comment Type E It should be bit 1.200.3 rather than 1.200.2 Suggested
IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, 200 Gb/s Ethernet 1st Task Force review comments Response # 1Cl 091 SC 91.6.2a P 86 L 11 Comment Type E It should be bit 1.200.3 rather than 1.200.2 SuggestedRemedy Ch
MainTable IEEE P802.3an D3.1 10GBASE-T Comments # 15Cl 00 SC 0 P 0 L 0 Comment Type E P. Dawe - Editorials; capitals, column widths, font sizes, odd marks in figures, front matter, 802.3-2005 vs 802.3
IEEE P802.3bq D2.1 Physical Layer and Management Parameters for 40Gb/s Operation, Type 40GBASE-T 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments 56Cl 45 SC 45.2.7.10 P 44 L 20 Comment Type TR Markup o
IEEE P802.3cy D3.0 10G+ Auto Task Force Initial Sponsor ballot commentsProposed Responses I-1Cl 0 SC 0 P 1 L 0 Comment Type G It seems unlikely that .3cw (Amendment #8) is approved before .3cy (Amendm
spastyle.doc IEEE C802.20 Version 17 Evaluation Criteria P< signatdeion >D< number > {INSERT DATE} {INSERT DATE} P< designation >D< number > Project IEEE 802.20 Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wirel
Comments Processed: Working Group Review of IEEE 802.16.1-00/01r4 1999-11-10 IEEE 802.16s0-99/5 Page Number Line Number: Item Number: 1 Commentor Name: Gupta Rakesh Description of Edi A minimal subset
MainTable comments # 280Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E SuggestedRemedy Comment Status X Response Status O NoName Proposed Response # 205Cl 00 SC P 2 L 1 Comment Type E Add note to balloters to indicate t
spastyle.doc IEEE C802.20 Version 17 Evaluation Criteria P< signatdeion >D< number > {INSERT DATE} {INSERT DATE} P< designation >D< number > Project IEEE 802.20 Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wirel
IEEE P802.16m/D8 Sponsor Ballot Recirc Comment Database 2010/10/06 Adopt contribution C802.16m-10/0985.doc or its latest revision Suggested Remedy To improve the multi-BS MIMO sounding phase calibrati
MainTable P802.3ah Draft 1.2 Comments # 561C 01 S 57.2.2 P 190 L 5 Comment Type E This reference needs to be added to Clause 1.3 SuggestedRemedy Add this reference to Clause 1.3 Proposed Response ACCE
ATTACHMENT 6 Ch.6 – TECHNOLOGY – Att. 6.7 Project IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < http://ieee802.org/16 > Title Further proposed edits to [IMT.EVAL] Draft Date Submitted 2007-11-
MainTable IEEE-SA PatCom Educational material - Comment period ending 20th February 2007 - CommentsVersion 2.5 9th March 2007 # 104Document Companion Clause/Question P 1 L 5 Comment Type E As a techni
Network Working Group S. Sreemanthula (Ed.) Internet-Draft Nokia Expires: September 7, 2006 G. Daley Panasonic S. Faccin Nokia E. Hepworth Siemens/Roke Manor Research S. Das Telcordia March 06, 2006 R
IEEE P802.3bq D2.3 25G/40GBASE-T Ethernet 3rd Working Group recirculation ballot comments 1Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type E Now that the 802.3bx revision has been approved by the IEEE SASB, the "base_yea
doc.: IEEE 802.18-03-0041-00-0000 July 2003 doc.: IEEE 802.18-03-0041-00-0000 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Revision of Parts 2 and 15 of the Com
Final resolutions to comments against Draft 1.0 IEEE P802.3ap draft 1.0 Comments # 39Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E PICS for Clauses 70 through 73 are no longer aligned with the text. SuggestedRemedy Re-