MainTable IEEE P802.3ct D1.2 100 Gb/s over DWDM systems 3rd Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 45 SC 45.2.1.186aa.1 P36 L35 Comment Type T The "IFEC bypass indication enable" bit when
MainTable IEEE P802.3ct D1.2 100 Gb/s over DWDM systems 3rd Task Force review comments # 49Cl FM SC FM P1 L26 Comment Type E spelling SuggestedRemedy Change "EEE" to "IEEE" Comment Status X Response S
IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, 200 Gb/s Ethernet 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 045 SC 45.2.1 P 47 L 25 Comment Type T The choice of registers 284 through 28
IEEE P802.3bt D2.2 4-Pair PoE 2nd Working Group recirculation ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 33 SC 33.2.8.5 P 122 L 25 Comment Type TR Section 33.2.8.5 can be reordered to be much more clear.
IEEE P802.3bt D2.2 4-Pair PoE 2nd Working Group recirculation ballot comments 3Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 25 Comment Type E The amendment purpose and ballot stage has disappeared. SuggestedRemedy Change "This
IEEE P802.3cf D3.0 YANG Data Model Definitions Initial Sponsor ballot commentsProposed Responses # i-18Cl FM SC FM P1 L1 Comment Type E "IEEE P802.3.2(TM)/D2.1" should be "IEEE P802.3.2(TM)/D3.0" Sugg
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.1 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 00 SC 0 P 12 L 47 Comment Type E If you look at the 802.3cy project, it
IEEE P802.3bq D3.0 25G/40GBASE-T Ethernet Initial Sponsor ballot comments Proposed Response # i-1Cl 28 SC 28.3.1 P 27 L 8 Comment Type E In the editing instruction "the first list" should be "in the f
MainTable D2.1 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 2.5 Gb/s, 5 Gb/s, and 10 Gb/s Autom P802.3ch D2.1 38Cl 149C SC 149C.1 P 203 L 11 Comment Type T 149C has no informationon ret
MainTable D2.1 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 2.5 Gb/s, 5 Gb/s, and 10 Gb/s Autom P802.3ch D2.1 # 40Cl FM SC P 2 L 5 Comment Type E "This amendment to IEEE Std 802.3-2018
MainTable D2.1 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 2.5 Gb/s, 5 Gb/s, and 10 Gb/s Autom P802.3ch D2.1 168Cl 149 SC 149.4.2.4.5 P L Comment Type E SuggestedRemedy REJECT. empty c
IEEE 802.3by D1.0 25 Gb/s Ethernet 2nd Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 045 SC 45.2.1.102.1 P 43 L 16 Comment Type E "alignment markers lock" should be "alignment marker lock" Sugges
IEEE P802.3bq D3.0 25G/40GBASE-T Ethernet Initial Sponsor ballot comments i-97Cl 113 SC 113.11 P 196 L 27 Comment Type TR Equation 44-1 and Table 44-3 are specific to 10 Gb/s. For higher bit rates, th
IEEE 802.3by D1.0 25 Gb/s Ethernet 2nd Task Force review comments # 66Cl 000 SC 0 P L Comment Type E The PDF Document Properties are not filled in completely: Title: IEEE P802.3xx name of Task Force S
MainTable D2.1 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 2.5 Gb/s, 5 Gb/s, and 10 Gb/s Autom P802.3ch D2.1 Proposed Response # 1Cl 45 SC 45.2.1 P 32 L 31 Comment Type T The definitio
1 | P a g e MINUTES (Unconfirmed) IEEE 802 LMSC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING, Revision 1 Prepared by John D’Ambrosia, Recording Secretary Monday, March 9, 2015 – 8:00 a.m. All times CET Estrel Berlin B
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.1 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments # 231Cl FM SC FM P 10 L 16 Comment Type E "physical layer" should be capitalized SuggestedRemedy
IEEE 802.3by D1.0 25 Gb/s Ethernet 2nd Task Force review comments Response # 1Cl 045 SC 45.2.1.102.1 P 43 L 16 Comment Type E "alignment markers lock" should be "alignment marker lock" SuggestedRemedy
IEEE P802.3bq D3.0 25G/40GBASE-T Ethernet Initial Sponsor ballot comments # i-89Cl 0 SC 0 P L Comment Type TR The style manual says "...the use of the word must is deprecated and shall not be used whe
IEEE 802.3by D1.0 25 Gb/s Ethernet 2nd Task Force review comments # 66Cl 000 SC 0 P L Comment Type E The PDF Document Properties are not filled in completely: Title: IEEE P802.3xx name of Task Force S
1 | P a g e MINUTES (Unconfirmed) IEEE 802 LMSC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING, Revision 0 Prepared by John D’Ambrosia, Recording Secretary Friday, Jul 29, 2016 – 1p.m. All times PDT Grand Hyatt San Dieg
MainTable IEEE P802.3at D3.0 PoEplus comments Response # 1Cl 33E SC 33E P 151 L 10 Comment Type E Include a reference to channel DC resistance unbalance specifications defined by TIA. SuggestedRemedy
MainTable IEEE P802.3at D3.0 PoEplus comments # 467Cl 00 SC 00 P L Comment Type ER The current ballot claims that it is referenced against P802.3ay Draft 2.1. As of the date of the close of this ballo
MainTable IEEE P802.3at D4.0 PoEplus comments # 178Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type GR The impulse value of 1.5 kV 10/700 is too low for the above reasons. Compliance only to the lower 1.5 kV 10/700 condit