MainTable comments # 280Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E SuggestedRemedy Comment Status X Response Status O NoName Proposed Response # 169Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type TR The objectives state that we will su
MainTable IEEE P802.3az D1.0 Energy Efficient Ethernet comments IEEE P802.3az D1.0 Nov 2008 # 243Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type E at the risk of getting the 8-ball, I think we should be consistent about
IEEE 802.3 comment tool IEEE P802.3bp D1.4 1000BASE-T1 PHY 5th Task Force review commentsApproved Responses # 504Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type E Is there supposed to be a period after heach item in a De
MainTable IEEE P802.3az D1.0 Energy Efficient Ethernet comments IEEE P802.3az D1.0 Nov 2008 Proposed Response # 1Cl 24 SC 24.4.1 P 49 L 53 Comment Type T Saying '100BASE-X supports Low Power Idle mode
MainTable IEEE P802.3az D3.0 Energy Efficient Ethernet comments Comments received Proposed Response # 1Cl 55 SC 55.4.6.5 P 217 L 34 Comment Type E Comment 9 against D 2.3 was not fully implemented Sug
IEEE P802.3cy D2.0 10G+ Auto Task Force Initial Working Group ballot commentsApproved Responses # 447Cl FM SC FM P 1 L Comment Type E The FrameMaker template has been updated to Version 5.1 by Pete An
MainTable IEEE P802.3az D3.0 Energy Efficient Ethernet comments Comments received # 327Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type ER Bookmark for 40.5.1 is under 40.4 SuggestedRemedy Correct bookmark for 40.5.1 so i
IEEE P802.3ap Draft 2.0 Comments IEEE P802.3ap draft 2.0 Comments # 93Cl 00 SC 00 P L Comment Type T The IEEE P802.3ap/Draft 2.0 definition of ""differential Manchester encoding"" is not consistent wi
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.0 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems Initial Working Group ballot comments # 151Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 2 Comment Type E IEEE Std 802.3-2022 is both approved and published. SuggestedRemed
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.0 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems Initial Working Group ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 25 Comment Type E "IEEE Std 802.3-202x" is no lomnger correct - we
MainTable IEEE P802.3aq Comments 13/ # 1Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type T As drafted, the standard allows the existance of a ""compliant"" equalizer with adaptation times too slow to ensure stable operation
spastyle.doc IEEE C802.20-05/35 P< signatdeion >D< number > {INSERT DATE} {INSERT DATE} P< designation >D< number > Project IEEE 802.20 Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access < http://group
spastyle.doc IEEE C802.20-04/xx P< signatdeion >D< number > {INSERT DATE} {INSERT DATE} P< designation >D< number > Project IEEE 802.20 Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access < http://group
spastyle.doc IEEE C802.20-05/35 P< signatdeion >D< number > {INSERT DATE} {INSERT DATE} P< designation >D< number > Project IEEE 802.20 Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access < http://group
spastyle.doc IEEE C802.20-04/xx P< signatdeion >D< number > {INSERT DATE} {INSERT DATE} P< designation >D< number > Project IEEE 802.20 Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access < http://group
MainTable IEEE P802.3aq Comments 23/ # 1Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type T As drafted, the standard allows the existance of a ""compliant"" equalizer with adaptation times too slow to ensure stable operation
Comments Received: Working Group Review of IEEE 802.16.1-00/01r4 1999-11-10 IEEE 802.16s0-99/5 Page Number Line Number Item Number 1 Commentor Name: Gupta Rakesh Description of Edit: A minimal subset
minutes_0699.PDF Page 1 of 31 Unconfirmed minutes IEEE 802.3 HSSG Interim meeting Coeur d’Alene, ID June 1st to 3rd 1999 TUESDAY 1 JUNE ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS Welcome and Introduction – Mr Jonathan Th
8023azD3p1proposed2 IEEE P802.3az D3.1 Energy Efficient Ethernet comments Proposed Responses D3.1 of 802.3az Proposed Response # 1Cl 78 SC 78.6.3 P 270 L 6 Comment Type TR When we structured the PICs
IEEE P802.3ck D2.1 100/200/400 Gb/s Electrical Interfaces Task Force 1st Working Group recirculation ballot comments # 26Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 31 Comment Type E 802.3cv is published. SuggestedRemedy Chang
IEEE 802.3bk Ethernet 1st Task Force review comments # 84Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type ER The draft should contain the usual description of the editing instructions after the contents section: "NOTE—The