IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, 200 Gb/s Ethernet 4th Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 045 SC 45.2.1.108 P 57 L 26 Comment Type E "Clause 91" should be a cross-reference and "91.5.2
AGENDA & MINUTES (Unconfirmed) - IEEE 802 LMSC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING Monday, November 10, 2008 – 8:00 a.m. All times central standard time (CST) Dallas, TX EC members present: Paul Nikolich - Ch
High Rate Physical Layer Solution for TG3a March, 1994 DOC: IEEE P802.11-94/xxx May, 2003 IEEE P802.15-03/138r DOCPROPERTY "Category" \* MERGEFORMAT 2 IEEE P802.15 Wireless Personal Area Networks™ Pro
IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, 200 Gb/s Ethernet 4th Task Force review comments # 50Cl 000 SC 0 P - L - Comment Type T A number of the specification values that were adopted in the original baseline
Prop– January 1998 doc.: IEEE P802.11-98/2-r1 Submission page 1Hitoshi Takanase, NTT Wireless Systems Labs OFDM Physical Layer Specification for the 5 GHz Band Introduction This clause describes the p
IEEE P802.16m/D7 Sponsor Ballot Recirc Comment Database 2010/10/25 Add the following to the footer of each page of the source document: "This is an unapproved IEEE Standards draft, subject to change.
IEEE P802.3cz D3.01 Multi-Gigabit Optical Automotive Ethernet Initial Sponsor ballot comments # I-7Cl FM SC FM P1 L11 Comment Type G When looking at the title in a large font it is really too long. We
ETSI/TC ERM#03(97)__ TD <> ETSI EN 300 440-1 V1.4.1 (2007-05) European Standard (Telecommunications series) Electromagnetic compatibility and Radio spectrum Matters (ERM); Short range devices; Radio e
IEEE P802.3bt D3.2 4P PoE 2nd Sponsor recirculation ballot comments r02-24Cl FM SC FM P19 L2 Comment Type E OOS Missing space in TOC: 145.2.10 PSE Maintain .... SuggestedRemedy Add space ACCEPT. Comme
Higher power limits for licence exempt devices Higher power limits for licence exempt devices Understanding the Scope for a Power Increase at 2.4 and 5 GHz Consultation Publication date: 12 July 2006
IEEE P802.3cw/df/3dj September interim meeting minutes - unapproved Joint Meeting of the IEEE P802.3cw DWDM Systems Task Force, IEEE P802.3df 400 Gb/s and 800 Gb/s Ethernet Task Force and IEEE P802.3d
1994 Doc: IEEE P802.11 - 92/64b2 Issue Identification: 1.2 (Topic: 'Standard' Process). - Do we want to develop a weighted list of criteria (i.e.; delays, efficiency. etc.) ? - What do we mean by effi
TI Physical Layer Proposal for IEEE 802.15 Task Group 3a March, 1994 DOC: IEEE P802.11-94/xxx May, 2003 IEEE P802.15-03/142r1 DOCPROPERTY "Category" \* MERGEFORMAT IEEE P802.15 Wireless Personal Area
IEEE P802.3ae/D3.3 Comment Resolutions P802.3ae Draft 3.3 Comments # 105Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E BERT is bit error RATIO (most times) - see definitions 1.5 or manufacturer's literature. SuggestedRe
January 1992 Doc: IEEE P802.11/92-20 IEEE 802.11 Wireless Access Method and Physical Layer Specifications Wireles~ Local Area Network Requirements IEEE Project 802.11 K. Biba (ad.) Abstract An effecti
IEEE P802.3aq 10GBASE-LRM Task Force IEEE P802.3aq Comments 01/ # 1Cl 00 SC P 1 L 1 Comment Type TR The bulk of the work in 802.3aq to this point has centered on simulations; the technical feasibility
IEEE 802.3db D2.0 100G, 200G, 400G Short Reach Fiber Task Force Initial Working Group ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 167 SC Table 167-7 P51 L27 Comment Type E The TDECQ is the same for both v
IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, 200 Gb/s Ethernet Initial Working Group ballot comments # 30Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 31 Comment Type E The Working Group Chair has now announced the assumed approval order fo
End to End Channel Pairto pair resistance unbalance IEEE802.3 4P Task Force Channel Pair To Pair Resistance Imbalance (End to End System Imbalance) Ad Hoc July 2014 Yair Darshan Microsemi ydarshan@mic
IEEE 802.3db D2.0 100G, 200G, 400G Short Reach Fiber Task Force Initial Working Group ballot comments # 216Cl FM SC FM P1 L10 Comment Type E The introduction identifies the amendment as #4. SuggestedR
IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, 200 Gb/s Ethernet Initial Working Group ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 132 SC 132.1 P 129 L 23 Comment Type E "64-bit wide" or "64-bit-wide"? Given that these