118068 results found. results are sorted by relevance
  326-350
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cw/comments/D2p0/8023cw_D2p0_comments_final_so_far_Oct_18_by_ID.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.0 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems Initial Working Group ballot comments Response # 1Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 25 Comment Type E "IEEE Std 802.3-202x" is no lomnger correct - we know it w
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/efm/public/comments/d3_1/D3_1_prelim_report.pdf
MainTable P802.3ah Draft 3.1 Comments # 99300Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type TR The entirely new concept to 802.3 of doing shared access via an entirely new access protocol is hidden through lack of use of
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bt/comments/802d3bt_D3p0_Incoming_DraftOrder.pdf
IEEE P802.3bt D3.0 4-Pair PoE Initial Sponsor ballot comments i-476Cl 30 SC 30 P L Comment Type T Who is generating the SNMP MIBs based on clause 30? SuggestedRemedy Group to discuss. Comment Status X
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cw/comments/D2p0/8023cw_D2p0_comments_final_so_far_Sept_15_by_ID.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.0 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems Initial Working Group ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 25 Comment Type E "IEEE Std 802.3-202x" is no lomnger correct - we
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/at/comments/D3.0/P802d3at_D3p0_postmtg_closed_by_clause.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3at D3.0 PoEplus comments # 504Cl 00 SC 00 P L Comment Type TR Please resolve where the TLVs for 802.3at will reside. Will it be in 802.1, 802.3 at or somewhere else SuggestedRemed
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/db/comments/P802d3db_D2p0_proposed_responses_by_Clause.pdf
MainTable EE 802.3db D2.0 100G, 200G, 400G Short Reach Fiber Task Force Initial Working Group ballot comment # 216Cl FM SC FM P 1 L10 Comment Type E The introduction identifies the amendment as #4. Su
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cd/comments/8023cd_D12_comments_received_by_ID.pdf
IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, 200 Gb/s Ethernet 3rd Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 136 SC 136.9.4.2 P 216 L 1 Comment Type T Separate interference tolerance (noise stress) and j
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/df/comments/D1p0/8023df_D1p0_comments_final_ID.pdf
IEEE P802.3df D1.0 1st Task Force review comments Response # 1Cl 45 SC 45.2.4 P 47 L 4 Comment Type T "45.2.4 PHY XS registers" and "45.2.5 DTE XS registers" subsections need to be brought into the 80
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/df/comments/D1p0/8023df_D1p0_comments_proposed_clause_221129.pdf
IEEE P802.3df D1.0 1st Task Force review comments # 110Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 10 Comment Type E "Amendment:" - there should be an amendment number here. According to pages 13 and 14, this would be number 1
802.3ae
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/at/comments/D3.0/P802d3at_D3p0_postmtg_closed_by_ID.pdf
802.3ae IEEE P802.3at D3.0 PoEplus comments Response # 23Cl 33 SC 33.2.8.1 P 45 L 46 Comment Type E Substitue variable name for number SuggestedRemedy Change 51mA to Iclass_lim Min ACCEPT. Comment Sta
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cp/public/2007/p802d3cp_2d0_comments_received_r2.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cp D2.0 Bidirectional 10 Gb/s, 25 Gb/s, and 50 Gb/s Optical Access PHYs Initial Working Group ballot comments # 147Cl FM SC FM P1 L10 Comment Type ER State this is amendment 11 an
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/17/projects/P802_17c/P802_17c_MIB.txt
IEEE-802DOT17-RPR-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN IMPORTS MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, Integer32, Counter32, Counter64, Unsigned32 FROM SNMPv2-SMI MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP FROM SNMPv2-CONF MacAddres
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cd/comments/8023cd_D12_comment_received_by_clause.pdf
IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, 200 Gb/s Ethernet 3rd Task Force review comments # 10Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 31 Comment Type E IEEE Std 802.3bu-2016 and IEEE Std 802.3bv-201x are missing from the list of a
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/db/comments/P802d3db_D2p0_proposed_responses_by_ID.pdf
MainTable EE 802.3db D2.0 100G, 200G, 400G Short Reach Fiber Task Force Initial Working Group ballot comment Proposed Response # 1Cl 167 SC Table 167-7 P 51 L27 Comment Type E The TDECQ is the same fo
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/17/documents/presentations/mar2009/802_17c.mib
IEEE-802DOT17-RPR-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN IMPORTS MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, Integer32, Counter32, Counter64, Unsigned32 FROM SNMPv2-SMI MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP FROM SNMPv2-CONF MacAddres
Comments received on Draft 2.1 and comments carried over from Draft 2.0
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/aq/public/comments/d2.1/P802.3aqD2.1com13Jul05.pdf
Comments received on Draft 2.1 and comments carried over from Draft 2.0 IEEE P802.3aq Draft 2.1 Comments # 1001Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type TR See John George's Comment #6 in recirculation package. Sugge
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/ck/comments/draft2p0/8023ck_D2p0_comments_received.pdf
IEEE P802.3ck D2.0 100/200/400 Gb/s Electrical Interfaces Task Force Initial Working Group ballot comments # 229Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 10 Comment Type E From the amendment list starting at line 28, it appe
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/df/comments/D1p0/8023df_D1p0_comments_proposed_ID.pdf
IEEE P802.3df D1.0 1st Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 45 SC 45.2.4 P 47 L 4 Comment Type T "45.2.4 PHY XS registers" and "45.2.5 DTE XS registers" subsections need to be brought in
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/df/comments/D1p0/8023df_D1p0_comments_proposed_ID_221129.pdf
IEEE P802.3df D1.0 1st Task Force review comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 45 SC 45.2.4 P 47 L 4 Comment Type T "45.2.4 PHY XS registers" and "45.2.5 DTE XS registers" subsections need to be brought in
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/df/comments/D1p0/8023df_D1p0_comments_proposed_clause.pdf
IEEE P802.3df D1.0 1st Task Force review comments # 110Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 10 Comment Type E "Amendment:" - there should be an amendment number here. According to pages 13 and 14, this would be number 1
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/df/comments/D1p0/8023df_D1p0_comments_final_clause.pdf
IEEE P802.3df D1.0 1st Task Force review comments # 110Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 10 Comment Type E "Amendment:" - there should be an amendment number here. According to pages 13 and 14, this would be number 1
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cp/comments/p802d3cp_D2p0_Received_r2.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cp D2.0 Bidirectional 10 Gb/s, 25 Gb/s, and 50 Gb/s Optical Access PHYs Initial Working Group ballot comments # 147Cl FM SC FM P1 L10 Comment Type ER State this is amendment 11 an
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/ck/comments/draft2p0/8023ck_D2p0_comments_received_sortedByNumber.pdf
IEEE P802.3ck D2.0 100/200/400 Gb/s Electrical Interfaces Task Force Initial Working Group ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 45 SC 45.2.1.115a P 46 L 13 Comment Type E When a new subclause is in
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bj/comments/P8023bj-D3p0-Comments_Received_byID.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D3.0 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable Initial Sponsor ballot comments Proposed Response # i-1Cl 80 SC 80.1.1 P 98 L 14 Comment Type E 40 Gb/s and 100 Gb/s Physical Layer ent
MainTable
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bj/comments/P8023bj-D3p0-Comments_Received_byCls.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3bj D3.0 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable Initial Sponsor ballot comments # i-6Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type G General comment SuggestedRemedy There appears to be editorial opport