IEEE P802.3bt D3.1 4-Pair PoE 1st Sponsor recirculation ballot comments r01-60Cl 1 SC 1.4.338 P 24 L 40 Comment Type ER We pulled in the definition of PSE as modified by 802.3bu. The term "DTE powerin
IEEE P802.3cd 50 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s, 200 Gb/s Ethernet 3rd Task Force review comments # 10Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 31 Comment Type E IEEE Std 802.3bu-2016 and IEEE Std 802.3bv-201x are missing from the list of a
IEEE P802.3bj D2.0 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable Initial Working Group ballot comments # 12Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E Use of acronyms not in 1.5. FW is broadly used in this document, though pri
IEEE P802.3ck D2.0 100/200/400 Gb/s Electrical Interfaces Task Force Initial Working Group ballot comments # 229Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 10 Comment Type E From the amendment list starting at line 28, it appe
IEEE P802.3ck D2.0 100/200/400 Gb/s Electrical Interfaces Task Force Initial Working Group ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 45 SC 45.2.1.115a P 46 L 13 Comment Type E When a new subclause is in
IEEE P802.3bj D2.0 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable Initial Working Group ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 45 SC 45.2.1.92b P 37 L 48 Comment Type T There is a need for an align status bit i
IEEE 802.16.1: Action Report on Comment Resolution at Session #11 IEEE 802.16.1: Action Report on Comment Resolution at Session #11: 2001/02/18 2001/02/18 IEEE 802.16.1-01/07 Stanley Wang Neither Edit
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.0 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems Initial Working Group ballot comments # 151Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 2 Comment Type E IEEE Std 802.3-2022 is both approved and published. SuggestedRemed
MainTable IEEE P802.3at D3.0 PoEplus comments # 467Cl 00 SC 00 P L Comment Type ER The current ballot claims that it is referenced against P802.3ay Draft 2.1. As of the date of the close of this ballo
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.0 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems Initial Working Group ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 25 Comment Type E "IEEE Std 802.3-202x" is no lomnger correct - we
MainTable IEEE P802.3at D3.0 PoEplus comments Response # 1Cl 33E SC 33E P 151 L 10 Comment Type E Include a reference to channel DC resistance unbalance specifications defined by TIA. SuggestedRemedy
MainTable P802.3ah Draft 1.732 Comments # 348Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E typo: 025 should be 0.25 SuggestedRemedy Proposed Response PROPOSED ACCEPT IN PRINCIPLE. The commenter is asked to indicate the
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.0 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems Initial Working Group ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 25 Comment Type E "IEEE Std 802.3-202x" is no lomnger correct - we
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.0 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems Initial Working Group ballot comments # 151Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 2 Comment Type E IEEE Std 802.3-2022 is both approved and published. SuggestedRemed
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.0 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems Initial Working Group ballot comments # 151Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 2 Comment Type E IEEE Std 802.3-2022 is both approved and published. SuggestedRemed
MainTable IEEE P802.3cw D2.0 400 Gb/s over DWDM systems Initial Working Group ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 25 Comment Type E "IEEE Std 802.3-202x" is no lomnger correct - we
IEEE P802.3bj D2.0 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable Initial Working Group ballot comments # 12Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E Use of acronyms not in 1.5. FW is broadly used in this document, though pri
IEEE P802.3bj D2.0 100 Gb/s Backplane and Copper Cable Initial Working Group ballot comments Proposed Response # 1Cl 45 SC 45.2.1.92b P 37 L 48 Comment Type T There is a need for an align status bit i
MainTable IEEE P802.3br (D2.0) Interspersing Express Traffic Initial Working Group ballot comments # 292Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E The attribute aMACMergeStatusTx contains the direction "Tx". Should
IEEE P802.3cy D3.0 10G+ Auto Task Force Initial Sponsor ballot commentsReceived Comments # I-14Cl FM SC FM P 1 L 10 Comment Type E It appears to me that this project is likely to get to RevCom before
IEEE P802.3bz D1.0 2.5/5GBASE-T 1st Task Force review comments # 211Cl 00 SC 0 P 1 L 28 Comment Type E Both "twisted-pair" and "twisted pair" appear to be used interchangeably throughout the document.
Microsoft Word - 55518.doc Federal Communications Commission FCC 06-24 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Amendment of the Commission’s Part 90 Rules
802.3ae IEEE P802.3ba D1.2 40Gb/s and 100Gb/s Ethernet comments Draft 1.2 Comments Task force Review Response # 1Cl 82 SC 82.2.4.4 P 170 L 15 Comment Type T 'TXC or RXC' is not specified for Z4, Z5, Z
The Ultra-Wide Bandwidth Indoor Channel:from Statistical Model to Simulations March, 1994 DOC: IEEE P802.11-94/xxx January, 2005 IEEE 15-05-0004-00-004a Project IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless
IEEE P802.3bz D1.0 2.5/5GBASE-T 1st Task Force review comments # 120Cl 126 SC 126.7.4 P 169 L 8 Comment Type E This subclause lacks a clear and logical narrative. Suggest to reorganize the existing in