Previous by thread: Re: Accuracy of 754-compliant recommended functions Next by thread: Re: Accuracy of 754-compliant recommended functions Index(es): Date Thread

Re: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?

SUBED1=STDS-1788&A=1 Follow-Ups : Re: IEEE 754 revision: request for volunteers From: Hossam Fahmy References : IEEE 754 revision: request for volunteers From: Ralph Baker Kearfott Prev by Date: Re: IEEE 754 revision: request for volunteers Next by Date: IEEE 754 revision: request for volunteers Previous by thread: IEEE 754 revision: request for volunteers Next by thread: Re: IEEE 754 revision: request for volunteers Index(es): Date Thread

Re: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?

[STDS-1788]: IEEE 754 working group?

Re: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?

OK, now I think I understand, although I'd like to study 754 a bit more.

Follow-Ups : Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) From: Lee Winter References : Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) From: Michel Hack Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) From: Ulrich Kulisch Prev by Date: Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) Next by Date: Re: "Built upon 754" Previous by thread: Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) Next by thread: Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) Index(es): Date Thread

Re: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?

Re: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?

I urge those who care to join the 754 working group.

Follow-Ups : Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) From: Walter Mascarenhas References : Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) From: Michel Hack Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) From: Ulrich Kulisch Prev by Date: Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) Next by Date: Re: correction of errors in standards Previous by thread: Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) Next by thread: Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) Index(es): Date Thread

Re: Accuracy of 754-compliant recommended functions Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: Accuracy of 754-compliant recommended functions To : stds-1788 < stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject : Re: Accuracy of 754-compliant recommended functions From : Vincent Lefevre < vincent@xxxxxxxxxx > Date : Mon, 1 Jul 2013 18:47:25 +0200 Delivered-to : mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx In-reply-to : < 51D197E3.9030405@louisiana.edu > List-help : < https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?

William (Bill) Walster Re: Accuracy of 754-compliant recommended functions From: Ralph Baker Kearfott Prev by Date: Re: Sun's interval library Next by Date: Re: Accuracy of 754-compliant recommended functions Previous by thread: Re: Accuracy of 754-compliant recommended functions Next by thread: Re: Accuracy of 754-compliant recommended functions Index(es): Date Thread

Follow-Ups : Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) From: Oliver Heimlich References : Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) From: Michel Hack Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) From: Ulrich Kulisch Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) From: Oliver Heimlich Prev by Date: Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) Next by Date: Re: M001.02: YES Previous by thread: Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) Next by thread: Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) Index(es): Date Thread

I urge those who care to join the 754 working group.

IEEE '754-1985 was an unbelieveably huge improvement.

Re: Motion 4: P1788 on non-754?

Re: Accuracy of 754-compliant recommended functions Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: Accuracy of 754-compliant recommended functions To : Michel Hack < mhack@xxxxxxx > Subject : Re: Accuracy of 754-compliant recommended functions From : Ralph Baker Kearfott < rbk5287@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date : Mon, 01 Jul 2013 09:53:23 -0500 Cc : stds-1788 < stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Delivered-to : mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx In-reply-to : < 201307011422.r61EMWPX031773@d03av01.boulder.ibm.com > List-help : < https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?

SUBED1=STDS-1788&A=1 References : IEEE 754 revision: request for volunteers From: Ralph Baker Kearfott Re: IEEE 754 revision: request for volunteers From: Lee Winter Prev by Date: IEEE 1788-2015: revision of the standard, call for participation Next by Date: Re: IEEE 754 revision: request for volunteers Previous by thread: Re: IEEE 754 revision: request for volunteers Next by thread: IEEE 1788-2015: revision of the standard, call for participation Index(es): Date Thread

BIT Numerical > Mathematics, 39(3):539–560, 1999. > > Follow-Ups : Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) From: Walter Mascarenhas References : Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) From: Michel Hack Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) From: Ulrich Kulisch Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) From: Oliver Heimlich Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) From: Walter Mascarenhas Prev by Date: Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) Next by Date: Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) Previous by thread: Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) Next by thread: Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) Index(es): Date Thread

Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) Thread Links Date Links Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) To : Lee Winter < lee.j.i.winter@xxxxxxxxx > Subject : Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) From : David Lester < dlester@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Date : Sun, 31 Jan 2016 16:51:31 +0000 Cc : David Lester < dlester@xxxxxxxxxxxx >, Ulrich Kulisch < ulrich.kulisch@xxxxxxx >, Michel Hack < mhack@xxxxxxx >, stds-1788 < stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >, stds-754 < stds-754@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Delivered-to : mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx In-reply-to : List-help : < https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?

BIT Numerical >     Mathematics, 39(3):539–560, 1999. > > References : Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) From: Michel Hack Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) From: Ulrich Kulisch Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) From: Oliver Heimlich Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) From: Walter Mascarenhas Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) From: Oliver Heimlich Prev by Date: Re: "Built upon 754" Next by Date: Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) Previous by thread: Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter) Next by thread: Interrupting EDP...

William (Bill) Walster Re: Accuracy of 754-compliant recommended functions From: Ralph Baker Kearfott Re: Accuracy of 754-compliant recommended functions From: Michel Hack Prev by Date: On behalf of Jim Demmel -- Re: back to the roots Next by Date: Re: Sun's interval library Previous by thread: Re: Accuracy of 754-compliant recommended functions Next by thread: Re: Sun's interval library Index(es): Date Thread

Which direction should be chosen by default in 754?