453 results found. results are sorted by relevance
  276-300
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/email/stds-802-11-arc/msg00205.html
I’ll note that we have several topics that are related to other work, however, that may need to stay coordinated, so if anyone has any thoughts on the following, where we should discuss the topic in ARC to allow other parallel work to continue and still stay coordinated, please let me know: TGbd’s activities in support of IEEE 1609 Nendica and TGbe’s discussion on 802.11 Deterministic Network/Time-Sensitive Networking 802.1’s work on clarifying EPD/LPD.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/email/stds-802-11-arc/msg00210.html
I’ll note that we have several topics that are related to other work, however, that may need to stay coordinated, so if anyone has any thoughts on the following, where we should discuss the topic in ARC to allow other parallel work to continue and still stay coordinated, please let me know: -         TGbd’s activities in support of IEEE 1609 -         Nendica and TGbe’s discussion on 802.11 Deterministic Network/Time-Sensitive Networking -         802.1’s work on clarifying EPD/LPD. -         Architecture concepts in TGbc -         Architecture concepts in TGbd -         Is TGbe’s multi-link concept ready for Architecture concepts discussion/review?
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/17/email/msg00145.html
Box 1609,=0D=0A6th Floor, Two Blue Plaza,;Pearl River;New York;10965;USA end:vcard Follow-Ups : Re: [RPRWG] More comments on preemption From: Pankaj K Jha References : RE: [RPRWG] More comments on preemption From: Devendra Tripathi Re: [RPRWG] More comments on preemption From: Denton Gentry Prev by Date: Re: [RPRWG] Uploads & Next Meeting Agenda Next by Date: Re: [RPRWG] More comments on preemption Prev by thread: Re: [RPRWG] More comments on preemption Next by thread: Re: [RPRWG] More comments on preemption Index(es): Date Thread
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/email/stds-802-11-arc/msg00208.html
I’ll note that we have several topics that are related to other work, however, that may need to stay coordinated, so if anyone has any thoughts on the following, where we should discuss the topic in ARC to allow other parallel work to continue and still stay coordinated, please let me know: TGbd’s activities in support of IEEE 1609 Nendica and TGbe’s discussion on 802.11 Deterministic Network/Time-Sensitive Networking 802.1’s work on clarifying EPD/LPD.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/16/liaison/docs/L80216-06_011.pdf
Valery Timofeev Director, Radiocommunication Bureau Annex: 1 Distribution: – Administrations of Member States and Radiocommunication Sector Members – ITU-R Associates participating in the work of Radiocommunication Study Group 9 – Chairmen and Vice-Chairmen of Radiocommunication Study Groups and the Special Committee on Regulatory/Procedural Matters – Chairman and Vice-Chairmen of the Conference Preparatory Meeting – Members of the Radio Regulations Board – Secretary-General of the ITU, Director of the Telecommunication Standardization Bureau, Director of the Telecommunication Development Bureau INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION IEEE L802.16-06/011 - 2 - LITTLE AL:USERS:ROGER:DOCUMENTS:802:802.16:SOURCE FOLDER:SOURCE_LIAISON:L80216-06_011.DOC Annex 1 Titles of the Recommendations approved Recommendation ITU-R F.1330-2 Doc. 9/BL/13 Performance limits for bringing into service of the parts of international plesiochronous digital hierarchy and synchronous digital hierarchy paths and sections implemented by digital fixed wireless systems Recommendation ITU-R F.1093-2 Doc. 9/BL/14 Effects of multipath propagation on the design and operation of line-of-sight digital fixed wireless systems Recommendation ITU-R F.1609-1 Doc. 9/BL/15 Interference evaluation from fixed service systems using high altitude platform stations to conventional fixed service systems in the bands 27.5-28.35 GHz and 31-31.3 GHz Recommendation ITU-R F.382-8 Doc. 9/BL/16 Radio-frequency channel arrangements for fixed wireless systems operating in the 2 and 4 GHz bands Recommendation ITU-R F.384-9 Doc. 9/BL/17 Radio-frequency channel arrangements for medium and high capacity digital fixed wireless systems operating in the upper 6 GHz band Recommendation ITU-R F.699-7 Doc. 9/BL/18 Reference radiation patterns for fixed wireless system antennas for use in coordination studies and interference assessment in the frequency range from 100 MHz to about 70 GHz - 3 - LITTLE AL:USERS:ROGER:DOCUMENTS:802:802.16:SOURCE FOLDER:SOURCE_LIAISON:L80216-06_011.DOC Recommendation ITU-R F.1763 Doc. 9/BL/19 Radio interface standards for broadband wireless access systems in the fixed service operating below 66 GHz Recommendation ITU-R F.1764 Doc. 9/BL/20 Methodology to evaluate interference from fixed service systems using high altitude platform stations (HAPS) to fixed wireless systems in the bands above 3 GHz Recommendation ITU-R F.1765 Doc. 9/BL/21 Methodology for determining the aggregate equivalent isotropically radiated power from point-to-point high-density applications in the fixed service operating in bands above 30 GHz Recommendation ITU-R F.1766 Doc. 9/BL/22 Methodology to determine the probability of a radio astronomy observatory receiving interference based on calculated exclusion zones to protect against interference from point-to-multipoint high-density applications in the fixed service operating in bands around 43 GHz _____________
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/17/email/msg00036.html
Box 1609,=0D=0A6th Floor, Two Blue Plaza,;Pearl River;New York;10965;USA end:vcard References : RE: [RPRWG] MAC Question From: Sanjay Agrawal Prev by Date: RE: [RPRWG] MAC Question Next by Date: [RPRWG] temporal ordering requirement Prev by thread: RE: [RPRWG] MAC Question Next by thread: Re: [RPRWG] MAC Question Index(es): Date Thread
https://grouper.ieee.org/rac/private/email/msg05334.html
The values 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 to 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff are reserved for allocation by the IEEE 1609 Working Group  Applicants need to provide an organization name and contact information.
https://grouper.ieee.org/rac/private/email/msg05333.html
The values 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 to 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff are reserved for allocation by the IEEE 1609 Working Group  Applicants need to provide an organization name and contact information.
https://grouper.ieee.org/rac/private/email/msg05464.html
It has been noted by the WG that "there may be editorial changes as a result of late-arriving 1609 WG review, but these docs are stable technically."
https://grouper.ieee.org/rac/private/email/msg00903.html
IEEE 1609 would like an OID of the form: iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) ieee1609(TBD) I understand from the discussion that we need to go to ANSI to get an allocation under 840. 
https://grouper.ieee.org/rac/private/email/msg04918.html
Best regards, GeoffG On Jun 5, 2019, at 9:00 AM, Angela Thomas < a.n.thomas@xxxxxxxx > wrote: Hello all, This e-mail is to advise you of the opening of IEEE Standards Sponsor Revision Ballot Recirculation - 2 for: Title: Standard for Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE)-Identifiers Scope: This standard defines identifiers for use with the IEEE 1609(TM) series of standards.   
https://grouper.ieee.org/rac/private/email/msg05463.html
It has been noted by the WG that "there may be editorial changes as a result of late-arriving 1609 WG review, but these docs are stable technically."
https://grouper.ieee.org/rac/private/email/msg04908.html
Best regards, GeoffG On Jun 5, 2019, at 9:00 AM, Angela Thomas < a.n.thomas@xxxxxxxx > wrote: Hello all, This e-mail is to advise you of the opening of IEEE Standards Sponsor Revision Ballot Recirculation - 2 for: Title: Standard for Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE)-Identifiers Scope: This standard defines identifiers for use with the IEEE 1609(TM) series of standards.   
https://grouper.ieee.org/rac/private/email/msg05324.html
The values 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 to 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff are reserved for allocation by the IEEE 1609 Working Group  Applicants need to provide an organization name and contact information.
https://grouper.ieee.org/rac/private/email/msg05323.html
The values 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 to 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff are reserved for allocation by the IEEE 1609 Working Group  Applicants need to provide an organization name and contact information.
https://grouper.ieee.org/rac/private/email/msg04917.html
Best regards, GeoffG On Jun 5, 2019, at 9:00 AM, Angela Thomas < a.n.thomas@xxxxxxxx > wrote: Hello all, This e-mail is to advise you of the opening of IEEE Standards Sponsor Revision Ballot Recirculation - 2 for: Title: Standard for Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE)-Identifiers Scope: This standard defines identifiers for use with the IEEE 1609(TM) series of standards.   
https://grouper.ieee.org/rac/private/email/pdfeQZ5ohG2pK.pdf
Cover Page Using a Light Image IEEE Registration Authority OUI Registry Tiers proposal Glenn Parsons, RAC Chair November 2012 RAC Members  Glenn Parsons, Chair  Geoff Thompson, (LMSC prime) IEEE 802  Clint Chaplin, (LMSC alternate) IEEE 802  Bob Davis, (MSC prime)  Leonard Tsai, (MSC alternate)  Tom Kurihara, (VTS / ITS prime) IEEE 1609  Geoffrey Garner , (I&M prime) IEEE 1588  George Riley, ex-officio (CS SAB) Staff – Angela Thomas, RAC Secretary – Karen Lambert, Registrar 2 Current OUI based identifiers • Company_id is a 24-bit OUI value assigned by the IEEE-RA • CDI-32™ is a concatenation of a 24-bit OUI value assigned by the IEEE-RA and an 8-bit extension identifier assigned by the organization with that OUI assignment. • TCDI-40™ is a concatenation of a 24-bit OUI value assigned by the IEEE-RA and a16-bit extension identifier assigned by the organization with that OUI assignment. • MAC-48 (obsolete label) / EUI-48™ is a concatenation of a 24-bit OUI value assigned by the IEEE-RA and a 24-bit extension identifier assigned by the organization with that OUI assignment. • EUI-60 (deprecated) is a concatenation of a 24-bit OUI assigned by the IEEE-RA and a 36-bit extension identifier assigned by the organization with that OUI assignment. • EUI-64™ is a concatenation of the 24-bit or 36-bit OUI value assigned by the IEEE-RA and a 40-bit or 28-bit extension identifier assigned by the organization with that OUI assignment. • IPv6 is a concatenation of a 64-bit EUI-64™ (derived from a MAC-48/EUI-48™) and a 64-bit extension identifier assigned by the device with the MAC-48/EUI-48 ™ assignment.
https://grouper.ieee.org/rac/private/email/msg06126.html
The files that are located at   https://ieee.app.box.com/folder/166341576611   were approved by the 1609 WG today.  
https://grouper.ieee.org/rac/private/email/msg04916.html
Best regards, GeoffG On Jun 5, 2019, at 9:00 AM, Angela Thomas < a.n.thomas@xxxxxxxx > wrote: Hello all, This e-mail is to advise you of the opening of IEEE Standards Sponsor Revision Ballot Recirculation - 2 for: Title: Standard for Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE)-Identifiers Scope: This standard defines identifiers for use with the IEEE 1609(TM) series of standards.   
https://grouper.ieee.org/rac/private/email/msg03828.html
Attachment: Soraa’s Simple Device Management Protocol-2.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document Follow-Ups : Re: Open Ethertype Issues - Response and/or feedback requested by January 27th From: Karen Lambert References : Re: Open Ethertype Issues - Response and/or feedback requested by January 27th From: ROBERT GROW Re: Open Ethertype Issues - Response and/or feedback requested by January 27th From: Pat Thaler Re: Open Ethertype Issues - Response and/or feedback requested by January 27th From: Karen Lambert Prev by Date: Re: Open Ethertype Issues - Response and/or feedback requested by January 27th Next by Date: Re: PSID allocation process and criteria (from 1609 WG) Previous by thread: Re: Open Ethertype Issues - Response and/or feedback requested by January 27th Next by thread: Re: Open Ethertype Issues - Response and/or feedback requested by January 27th Index(es): Date Thread
https://grouper.ieee.org/rac/private/email/msg06127.html
The files that are located at   https://ieee.app.box.com/folder/166341576611   were approved by the 1609 WG today.  
https://grouper.ieee.org/rac/private/email/msg04911.html
Best regards, GeoffG On Jun 5, 2019, at 9:00 AM, Angela Thomas < a.n.thomas@xxxxxxxx > wrote: Hello all, This e-mail is to advise you of the opening of IEEE Standards Sponsor Revision Ballot Recirculation - 2 for: Title: Standard for Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE)-Identifiers Scope: This standard defines identifiers for use with the IEEE 1609(TM) series of standards.   
https://grouper.ieee.org/rac/private/email/msg04921.html
Best regards, GeoffG On Jun 5, 2019, at 9:00 AM, Angela Thomas < a.n.thomas@xxxxxxxx > wrote: Hello all, This e-mail is to advise you of the opening of IEEE Standards Sponsor Revision Ballot Recirculation - 2 for: Title: Standard for Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE)-Identifiers Scope: This standard defines identifiers for use with the IEEE 1609(TM) series of standards.   
https://grouper.ieee.org/rac/private/email/msg04913.html
Best regards, GeoffG On Jun 5, 2019, at 9:00 AM, Angela Thomas < a.n.thomas@xxxxxxxx > wrote: Hello all, This e-mail is to advise you of the opening of IEEE Standards Sponsor Revision Ballot Recirculation - 2 for: Title: Standard for Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE)-Identifiers Scope: This standard defines identifiers for use with the IEEE 1609(TM) series of standards.   
https://grouper.ieee.org/rac/private/email/msg02502.html
Section/Clause 4.2 Object Identifier (OID)  references: iso(1) iso-identified-organization(3) ieee(111) standards-association-numbered-series-standards(2) wave-stds(1609)  IE 1.3.111.2.1609   There was a proposal to subdivide the 1.3.111 OID submitted by Tony several years ago.