365 results found. results are sorted by relevance
  326-350
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/minutes/jul02/minutes_0702.pdf
Unconfirmed Minutes - IEEE 802.3 CSMA/CD Plenary Vancouver, BC July 8-11, 2002 Unconfirmed Minutes IEEE 802.3 CSMA/CD PLENARY Vancouver, BC July 8-11, 2002 MONDAY, 8 JULY ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS Mr.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/ak/public/comments/d40/P802.3ak_D4p0_T_TRComments.pdf
MainTable P802.3ak Draft 4.0 Comments # 385Cl 30B SC 0 P L Comment Type TR The list: ""TypeValue::= ENUMERATED"" has not added the appropriate value for your new aMauType SuggestedRemedy Fix Proposed Response REJECT.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/minutes/mar02/minutes_0302.pdf
Microsoft Word - Document1 RMG-0315 1 802.3 Minutes, March 2002 Unconfirmed Minutes IEEE 802.3 CSMA/CD PLENARY St.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cg/comments/802.3cg_draft3p0_Received_By%20Comment%20ID.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cg D3.0 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 10 Mb/s Operation and Associated Power Delivery over a Single Balanced Pair of Conductors Initial Sponsor ballot comments Proposed Response # i-1Cl 147 SC 147.9.2 P 203 L 32 Comment Type E Format of the "NOTE-" paragraph is incorrect SuggestedRemedy Use the appropriate paragraph style for "NOTE-" paragraphs.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cg/comments/802.3cg_draft3p0_Received_By%20Page%20Line.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cg D3.0 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 10 Mb/s Operation and Associated Power Delivery over a Single Balanced Pair of Conductors Initial Sponsor ballot comments i-287Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type G It will be a good standard, but at the moment there are missing so many instances, even if they can be considert editorial, that the commenter this time has to cast a negative vote .
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cg/comments/802.3cg_draft3p0_Received_By%20Clause%20Subclause.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cg D3.0 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 10 Mb/s Operation and Associated Power Delivery over a Single Balanced Pair of Conductors Initial Sponsor ballot comments # i-9Cl 00 SC FM P 12 L 28 Comment Type E The Editor's note: "New front matter text needs review." should be removed.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/minutes/jul01/minutes_0701.pdf
Microsoft Word - Document1 RMG-0315 1 802.3 Minutes, March 2001 Unconfirmed Minutes IEEE 802.3 CSMA/CD PLENARY Portland, OR July 9-12, 2001 MONDAY, 9 JULY ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS Mr.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/minutes/mar01/minutes_0301.pdf
Microsoft Word - Document1 RMG-0315 1 802.3 Minutes, March 2001 Unconfirmed Minutes IEEE 802.3 CSMA/CD PLENARY Hilton Head Island, SC March 12-15, 2001 MONDAY, 12 MARCH ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS Mr.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/18/Meeting_documents/2007_Sept/18-07-0084-00_IMT-Advanced_Eval.doc
ATTACHMENT 6 Ch.6 – TECHNOLOGY – Att. 6.7 Ch.6 – TECHNOLOGY – Att. 6.7 attachment 6.7 Source: Document 8F/TEMP/568 Working document towards proposed draft new [Report/Recommendation] [Guidelines for evaluation of radio interface technologies for IMT-Advanced] (xxxx) [Editors note: a new section on terminology is necessary for [IMT.EVAL].]
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/18/Meeting_documents/2007_Nov/L80216-07_070.doc
ATTACHMENT 6 Ch.6 – TECHNOLOGY – Att. 6.7 Project IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < http://ieee802.org/16 > Title Further proposed edits to [IMT.EVAL] Draft Date Submitted 2007-11-15 Source(s) Reza Arefi Acting Chair, IEEE 802.16 ITU-R Liaison Group Intel Corporation Reza.arefi@intel.com Re: IEEE 802.18 TAG Document 18-07-0084-00-0000_IMT-Advanced_Eval_d3.doc Abstract This document proposes material towards document [IMT.EVAL] draft (8F/1322 Att. 6.7).
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/Documents/DocumentArchives/1991_docs/1191042_scan.pdf
May 3,1991 Doc: IEEE P802.11/91-42 Tentative Minutes of the IEEE P802.11 Working Group Plenary Meeting Hilton Head Island, SC March 11-14, 1991 Monday, March 11, 1991, Afternoon.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/18/Meeting_documents/2007_Nov/18-07-0084-00_IMT-Advanced_Eval_d5_c.doc
ATTACHMENT 6 Ch.6 – TECHNOLOGY – Att. 6.7 18-07-0084-00-0000_d5c attachment 6.7 Source: Document 8F/TEMP/568 Working document towards proposed draft new [Report/Recommendation] [Guidelines for evaluation of radio interface technologies for IMT-Advanced] (xxxx) [Editors note: a new section on terminology is necessary for [IMT.EVAL].]
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/ad/comments/D1-0-Comments.pdf
Draft 1.0 TF Ballot Comments;2 This file contains the second revision of the P802.3ad Task Force Ballot comments.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/ak/public/comments/d40/P802.3ak_D4p0_AllComments.pdf
MainTable P802.3ak Draft 4.0 Comments # 513Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E Comment Type: TR Clause: 54 SubClause: 54.6 Page #: 28 Line #: 8 Comment: Time values reported in Table 54-5 are not specified in pS but in UI.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/ak/public/comments/d42/P802.3ak_D4p0_AllComments.pdf
MainTable P802.3ak Draft 4.0 Comments # 513Cl 00 SC P L Comment Type E Comment Type: TR Clause: 54 SubClause: 54.6 Page #: 28 Line #: 8 Comment: Time values reported in Table 54-5 are not specified in pS but in UI.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cg/comments/802.3cg_draft3p0_Eds%20Prop%20Resolutions_By%20Topic.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cg D3.0 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 10 Mb/s Operation and Associated Power Delivery over a Single Balanced Pair of Conductors Initial Sponsor ballot comments i-230Cl 45 SC 45.2.7.25.1 P 58 L 35 Comment Type ER I don't understand the purpose of this text.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cg/comments/802.3cg_draft3p0_prelim_resolved_By%20Page%20Line_52419.pdf
IEEE P802.3cg D3.0 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 10 Mb/s Operation and Associated Power Delivery over a Single Balanced Pair of Conductors Initial Sponsor ballot comments i-287Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type G It will be a good standard, but at the moment there are missing so many instances, even if they can be considert editorial, that the commenter this time has to cast a negative vote .
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cg/comments/802.3cg_draft3p0_edsalign_resolved_By%20Page%20Line_52719.pdf
IEEE P802.3cg D3.0 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 10 Mb/s Operation and Associated Power Delivery over a Single Balanced Pair of Conductors Initial Sponsor ballot comments i-287Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type G It will be a good standard, but at the moment there are missing so many instances, even if they can be considert editorial, that the commenter this time has to cast a negative vote .
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/Minutes/Cons_Minutes_May-2006.pdf
doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/0686r0 May, 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/0686r0 IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs Approved Minutes of the IEEE P802.11 Full Working Group Date: 2006-05-15 Author(s): Name Company Address Phone email Tim Godfrey Freescale Semiconductor +1-913-664-2544 Abstract Minutes of the 802.11 full working group.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cg/email/pdfLzs3h_tf_S.pdf
IEEE P802.3cg D3.0 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 10 Mb/s Operation and Associated Power Delivery over a Single Balanced Pair of Conductors Initial Sponsor ballot comments Response # i-1Cl 147 SC 147.9.2 P 203 L 32 Comment Type E Format of the "NOTE-" paragraph is incorrect SuggestedRemedy Use the appropriate paragraph style for "NOTE-" paragraphs.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cg/comments/802.3cg_draft3p0_edsalign_resolved_By%20Comment%20ID_52719.pdf
IEEE P802.3cg D3.0 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 10 Mb/s Operation and Associated Power Delivery over a Single Balanced Pair of Conductors Initial Sponsor ballot comments Response # i-1Cl 147 SC 147.9.2 P 203 L 32 Comment Type E Format of the "NOTE-" paragraph is incorrect SuggestedRemedy Use the appropriate paragraph style for "NOTE-" paragraphs.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cg/comments/802.3cg_draft3p0_Eds%20Prop%20Resolutions_By%20Clause%20Subclause.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cg D3.0 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 10 Mb/s Operation and Associated Power Delivery over a Single Balanced Pair of Conductors Initial Sponsor ballot comments # i-9Cl 00 SC FM P 12 L 28 Comment Type E The Editor's note: "New front matter text needs review." should be removed.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cg/comments/802.3cg_draft3p0_edsalign_resolved_By%20Clause_52719.pdf
IEEE P802.3cg D3.0 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 10 Mb/s Operation and Associated Power Delivery over a Single Balanced Pair of Conductors Initial Sponsor ballot comments # i-9Cl 00 SC FM P 12 L 28 Comment Type E The Editor's note: "New front matter text needs review." should be removed.
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cg/comments/802.3cg_draft3p0_Eds%20Prop%20Resolutions_By%20Page%20Line.pdf
MainTable IEEE P802.3cg D3.0 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 10 Mb/s Operation and Associated Power Delivery over a Single Balanced Pair of Conductors Initial Sponsor ballot comments i-287Cl 00 SC 0 P L Comment Type G It will be a good standard, but at the moment there are missing so many instances, even if they can be considert editorial, that the commenter this time has to cast a negative vote .
https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/cg/comments/802.3cg_draft3p0_prelim_resolved_By%20Topic_52419.pdf
IEEE P802.3cg D3.0 Physical Layer Specifications and Management Parameters for 10 Mb/s Operation and Associated Power Delivery over a Single Balanced Pair of Conductors Initial Sponsor ballot comments i-230Cl 45 SC 45.2.7.25.1 P 58 L 35 Comment Type ER I don't understand the purpose of this text.